LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Christian, Fuchs
Publisher: Heathwood
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: UOW9
There are a lot of claims about social and other media’s power today: Some say that we have experienced Twitter and Facebook revolutions. Others claim that social media democratise the economy or bring about a participatory culture. Other observers are more sceptical and stress social media’s realities as tools of control. Understanding social media requires a critical theory of society that uses a dialectical concept of power. A critical theory of society can then act as framework for understanding power in the age of social media. This chapter is a contribution to critically theorising media power in the age of social media. It categorises different notions of power, introduces a dialectical notion of media power discusses the dialectics of social media power, and draws some conclusions about the need for a dialectical and critical theory of the media and society.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Björklund, Per. 2011. Arvet efter Mubarak. Egyptens kamp för frihet. Stockholm: Verbal.
    • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986a. Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. New York: Routledge.
    • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986b. The (three) forms of capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research in the Sociology of Education, ed. John G. Richardson, 241-258. New York: Greenwood Press.
    • Castells, Manuel. 2009. Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Castells, Manuel. 2010. The rise of the network society. The information age: economy, society and culture, Volume I. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Second edition with a new preface.
    • Couldry, Nick. 2002. The place of media power. London: Routledge.
    • Curran, James. 2002. Media and power. London: Routledge.
    • Feenberg, Andrew. 2002. Transforming technology: a critical theory revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and punish. New York: Vintage.
    • Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-77. Brighton: Harvester.
    • Foucault, Michel. 1982. The subject and power. Afterword. In Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, ed. Hubert Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow, 207-226. Brighton: Harvester Press.
    • Fuchs, Christian. 2003a. Some implications of Pierre Bourdieu's works for a theory of social self-organization. European Journal of Social Theory 6 (4): 387-408.
    • Fuchs, Christian. 2003b. Structuration theory and social self-organisation. Systemic Practice and Action Research 16 (2): 133-167.
    • Fuchs, Christian. 2008. Internet and society. Social theory in the information age. New York: Routledge.
    • Fuchs, Christian. 2010. Alternative media as critical media. European Journal of Social Theory 13 (2): 173-192.
    • Fuchs, Christian. 2014a. OccupyMedia! The Occupy movement and social media in crisis capitalism. Winchester: Zero Books.
    • Fuchs, Christian. 2014b. Social media: A critical introduction. London: Sage.
    • Galtung, Johan. 1990. Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research 27 (3): 291-305.
    • Gandy, Oscar H. 2009. Coming to terms with chance. Engaging rational discrimination and cumulative disadvantage. Farnham: Ashgate.
    • Ghonim, Wael. 2012. Revolution 2.0. The power of the people is greater than the people in power. A memoir. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
    • Giddens, Anthony. 1981. A contemporary critique of Historical Materialism. Vol. 1: Power, property and the state. London/Basingstoke: Macmillan.
    • Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The constitution of society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    • Giddens, Anthony. 1985. A contemporary critique of Historical Materialism. Vol. 2: The nation-state and violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Gladwell, Malcolm. 2010. Small change. Why the revolution will not be tweeted. The New Yorker October 2010: 42-49.
    • Gladwell, Malcolm and Clay Shirky. 2011. From innovation to revolution. Do social media make protests possible? Foreign Affairs 90 (2): 153-154.
    • Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
    • Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band 2. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
    • Habermas, Jürgen. 1986. Hannah Arendt's communications concept of power. In Power, ed. Steven Lukes, 75-93. New York: New York University Press.
    • Hall, Stuart, Chas Critcher, Tony Jefferson, John Clarke and Brian Roberts. 1978. Policing the crisis. Mugging, the state and law and order. London: Macmillan.
    • Horkheimer, Max. 1947. Eclipse of reason. New York: Continuum.
    • Jenkins, Henry. 2008. Convergence culture. New York: New York University Press.
    • Luhmann, Niklas. 1975. Macht. Stuttgart: Enke.
    • Luhmann, Niklas. 2000. Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
    • Marcuse, Herbert. 1941/1998. Some social implications of modern technology. In Technology, war and fascism, ed. Douglas Kellner, 39-65. London: Routledge.
    • Marx, Karl. 1852. The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. Moscow: Progress.
    • Marx, Karl. 1867. Capital. Volume 1. London: Penguin.
    • Marx, Karl. 1871. The civil war in France. In Marx Engels collected works, Volume 22, 307- 355. Moscow: Progress.
    • Morozov, Evgeny. 2010. The net delusion. How not to liberate the world. London: Allen Lane.
    • Morozov, Evgeny. 2013. To save everything, click here. Technology, solutionism and the urge to fix problems that don't exist. London: Allen Lane.
    • Poulantzas, Nicos. 1980. State, power, socialism. London: Verso.
    • Poulantzas, Nicos. 2008. The Poulantzas reader. London: Verso.
    • Sandoval, Marisol and Christian Fuchs. 2010. Towards a critical theory of alternative media. Telematics and Informatics 27 (2): 141-150.
    • Sullivan, Andrew. 2009. The revolution will be twittered. http://www.theatlantic.com/dailydish/archive/2009/06/the-revolution-will-be-twittered/200478/
    • Tapscott, Don and Anthony D. Williams. 2007. Wikinomics. How mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Penguin.
    • Thompson, John B. 1995. The media and modernity. A social theory of the media. Cambridge: Polity.
    • Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    • Weber, Marx. 2008. Max Weber's complete writings on academic and political vocations. New York: Algora.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article