LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Taylor, Frank E. (2015)
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: scattering [p p], ATLAS, Particle Physics - Experiment, QC, 530, Physical Sciences, 7000 GeV-cms, minimal [model], Settore FIS/04 - Fisica Nucleare e Subnucleare, High Energy Physics - Experiment, CERN LHC Coll, Top physics, Monte Carlo [numerical calculations], 1 [higher-order], Hadron-Hadron Scattering; Top physics; High Energy Physics; LHC; ATLAS, decay modes [W], experimental results, Flavor physics, kinematics, Hadron-Hadron Scattering, pair production [top], 0 [higher-order], Hadron-Hadron Scattering, Top physics, measured [differential cross section], Física, acceptance, Science & Technology, Fysik, rapidity dependence, Settore FIS/01 - Fisica Sperimentale, colliding beams [p p], stability [particle], transverse momentum dependence, ((n)jet lepton) [final state], measured [cross section]
ddc: ddc:500.2, ddc:530

Classified by OpenAIRE into

arxiv: High Energy Physics::Experiment, High Energy Physics::Phenomenology
Various differential cross-sections are measured in top-quark pair ($t\bar{t}$) events produced in proton--proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV at the LHC with the ATLAS detector. These differential cross-sections are presented in a data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $4.6$ fb$^{-1}$. The differential cross-sections are presented in terms of kinematic variables of a top-quark proxy referred to as the pseudo-top-quark whose dependence on theoretical models is minimal. The pseudo-top-quark can be defined in terms of either reconstructed detector objects or stable particles in an analogous way. The measurements are performed on $t\bar{t}$ events in the lepton+jets channel, requiring exactly one charged lepton and at least four jets with at least two of them tagged as originating from a $b$-quark. The hadronic and leptonic pseudo-top-quarks are defined via the leptonic or hadronic decay mode of the $W$ boson produced by the top-quark decay in events with a single charged lepton.The cross-section is measured as a function of the transverse momentum and rapidity of both the hadronic and leptonic pseudo-top-quark as well as the transverse momentum, rapidity and invariant mass of the pseudo-top-quark pair system. The measurements are corrected for detector effects and are presented within a kinematic range that closely matches the detector acceptance. Differential cross-section measurements of the pseudo-top-quark variables are compared with several Monte Carlo models that implement next-to-leading order or leading-order multi-leg matrix-element calculations. Various differential cross-sections are measured in top-quark pair $ \left(t\overline{t}\right) $ events produced in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $ \sqrt{s}=7 $ TeV at the LHC with the ATLAS detector. These differential cross-sections are presented in a data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 4.6 fb$^{−1}$. The differential cross-sections are presented in terms of kinematic variables, such as momentum, rapidity and invariant mass, of a top-quark proxy referred to as the pseudo-top-quark as well as the pseudo-top-quark pair system. The dependence of the measurement on theoretical models is minimal. Various differential cross-sections are measured in top-quark pair ($t\bar{t}$) events produced in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV at the LHC with the ATLAS detector. These differential cross-sections are presented in a data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $4.6$ fb$^{-1}$. The differential cross-sections are presented in terms of kinematic variables, such as momentum, rapidity and invariant mass, of a top-quark proxyreferred to as the pseudo-top-quark as well as the pseudo-top-quark pair system. The dependence of the measurement on theoretical models is minimal. The measurements are performed on $t\bar{t}$ events in the lepton+jets channel, requiring exactly one charged lepton and at least four jets with at least two of them tagged as originating from a $b$-quark. The hadronic and leptonic pseudo-top-quarks are defined via the leptonic or hadronic decay mode of the $W$ boson produced by the top-quark decay in events with a single charged lepton. Differential cross-section measurements of the pseudo-top-quark variables are compared with several Monte Carlo models that implement next-to-leading order or leading-order multi-leg matrix-element calculations.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [17] CMS collaboration, Measurement of differential top-quark pair production cross sections in pp colisions at √s = 7 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2339 [arXiv:1211.2220] [INSPIRE].
    • [18] M. Guzzi, K. Lipka and S.-O. Moch, Top-quark pair production at hadron colliders: differential cross section and phenomenological applications with DiffTop, JHEP 01 (2015) 082 [arXiv:1406.0386] [INSPIRE].
    • [19] S. Catani, M. Grazzini and A. Torre, Transverse-momentum resummation for heavy-quark hadroproduction, Nucl. Phys. B 890 (2014) 518 [arXiv:1408.4564] [INSPIRE].
    • [20] J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis, P. Nason and E. Re, Top-pair production and decay at NLO matched with parton showers, JHEP 04 (2015) 114 [arXiv:1412.1828] [INSPIRE].
    • [21] N. Kidonakis, NNNLO soft-gluon corrections for the top-quark pT and rapidity distributions, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 031501 [arXiv:1411.2633] [INSPIRE].
    • [22] A. Ferroglia, S. Marzani, B.D. Pecjak and L.L. Yang, Boosted top production: factorization and resummation for single-particle inclusive distributions, JHEP 01 (2014) 028 [arXiv:1310.3836] [INSPIRE].
    • [23] M. Dowling and S.-O. Moch, Differential distributions for top-quark hadro-production with a running mass, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3167 [arXiv:1305.6422] [INSPIRE].
    • [24] M. Czakon, M.L. Mangano, A. Mitov and J. Rojo, Constraints on the gluon PDF from top quark pair production at hadron colliders, JHEP 07 (2013) 167 [arXiv:1303.7215] [INSPIRE].
    • [25] C. Buttar et al., Standard Model Handles and Candles Working Group: Tools and Jets Summary Report, arXiv:0803.0678 [INSPIRE].
    • [32] CMS collaboration, Measurement of jet multiplicity distributions in tt production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 216 [arXiv:1404.3171] [INSPIRE].
    • [33] M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, The Anti-k(t) jet clustering algorithm, JHEP 04 (2008) 063 [arXiv:0802.1189] [INSPIRE].
    • [34] M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, The Catchment Area of Jets, JHEP 04 (2008) 005 [arXiv:0802.1188] [INSPIRE].
    • [35] Particle Data Group collaboration, K. Nakamura et al., Review of particle physics, J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 075021 [INSPIRE].
    • [36] L. Evans and P. Bryant, LHC Machine, 2008 JINST 3 S08001 [INSPIRE].
    • [37] S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re, A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP 06 (2010) 043 [arXiv:1002.2581] [INSPIRE].
    • [38] S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP 11 (2007) 070 [arXiv:0709.2092] [INSPIRE].
    • [39] S. Frixione, P. Nason and G. Ridolfi, A Positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction, JHEP 09 (2007) 126 [arXiv:0707.3088] [INSPIRE].
    • [40] P. Nason, A New method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP 11 (2004) 040 [hep-ph/0409146] [INSPIRE].
    • [41] S. Frixione and B.R. Webber, Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations, JHEP 06 (2002) 029 [hep-ph/0204244] [INSPIRE].
    • [42] M.L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini, R. Pittau and A.D. Polosa, ALPGEN, a generator for hard multiparton processes in hadronic collisions, JHEP 07 (2003) 001 [hep-ph/0206293] [INSPIRE].
    • [43] M.L. Mangano, M. Moretti and R. Pittau, Multijet matrix elements and shower evolution in hadronic collisions: W b¯b + n jets as a case study, Nucl. Phys. B 632 (2002) 343 [hep-ph/0108069] [INSPIRE].
    • [44] T. Sjo¨strand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175] [INSPIRE].
    • [45] G. Corcella et al., HERWIG 6: An Event generator for hadron emission reactions with interfering gluons (including supersymmetric processes), JHEP 01 (2001) 010 [hep-ph/0011363] [INSPIRE].
    • [46] J.M. Butterworth, J.R. Forshaw and M.H. Seymour, Multiparton interactions in photoproduction at HERA, Z. Phys. C 72 (1996) 637 [hep-ph/9601371] [INSPIRE].
    • [47] S. Jadach, Z. Was, R. Decker and J.H. Kuhn, The tau decay library TAUOLA: Version 2.4, Comput. Phys. Commun. 76 (1993) 361 [INSPIRE].
    • [48] E. Barberio and Z. Was, PHOTOS: A Universal Monte Carlo for QED radiative corrections. Version 2.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 79 (1994) 291 [INSPIRE].
    • [49] H.-L. Lai et al., New parton distributions for collider physics, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 074024 [arXiv:1007.2241] [INSPIRE].
    • [55] CTEQ collaboration, H.L. Lai et al., Global QCD analysis of parton structure of the nucleon: CTEQ5 parton distributions, Eur. Phys. J. C 12 (2000) 375 [hep-ph/9903282] [INSPIRE].
    • [56] M. Cacciari, M. Czakon, M. Mangano, A. Mitov and P. Nason, Top-pair production at hadron colliders with next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic soft-gluon resummation, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 612 [arXiv:1111.5869] [INSPIRE].
    • [57] M. Beneke, P. Falgari, S. Klein and C. Schwinn, Hadronic top-quark pair production with NNLL threshold resummation, Nucl. Phys. B 855 (2012) 695 [arXiv:1109.1536] [INSPIRE].
    • [58] M. Czakon, P. Fiedler and A. Mitov, Total Top-Quark Pair-Production Cross Section at Hadron Colliders Through O(αS4), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 252004 [arXiv:1303.6254] [INSPIRE].
    • [59] M. Czakon and A. Mitov, NNLO corrections to top pair production at hadron colliders: the quark-gluon reaction, JHEP 01 (2013) 080 [arXiv:1210.6832] [INSPIRE].
    • [60] M. Czakon and A. Mitov, NNLO corrections to top-pair production at hadron colliders: the all-fermionic scattering channels, JHEP 12 (2012) 054 [arXiv:1207.0236] [INSPIRE].
    • [61] P. Ba¨rnreuther, M. Czakon and A. Mitov, Percent Level Precision Physics at the Tevatron: First Genuine NNLO QCD Corrections to qq¯ → tt¯+ X, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 132001 [arXiv:1204.5201] [INSPIRE].
    • [62] M. Czakon and A. Mitov, Top++: A Program for the Calculation of the Top-Pair Cross-Section at Hadron Colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2930 [arXiv:1112.5675] [INSPIRE].
    • [63] J.M. Campbell and R.K. Ellis, An Update on vector boson pair production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 113006 [hep-ph/9905386] [INSPIRE].
    • [64] A.D. Martin, W.J. Stirling, R.S. Thorne and G. Watt, Parton distributions for the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 63 (2009) 189 [arXiv:0901.0002] [INSPIRE].
    • [65] B.P. Kersevan and E. Richter-Was, The Monte Carlo event generator AcerMC versions 2.0 to 3.8 with interfaces to PYTHIA 6.4, HERWIG 6.5 and ARIADNE 4.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 919 [hep-ph/0405247] [INSPIRE].
    • [66] N. Kidonakis, Next-to-next-to-leading-order collinear and soft gluon corrections for t-channel single top quark production, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 091503 [arXiv:1103.2792] [INSPIRE].
    • [68] N. Kidonakis, Two-loop soft anomalous dimensions for single top quark associated production with a W- or H-, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 054018 [arXiv:1005.4451] [INSPIRE].
    • [69] ATLAS collaboration, Charged particle multiplicities in pp interactions at √s = 0.9 and 7 TeV in a diffractive limited phase-space measured with the ATLAS detector at the LHC and new PYTHIA6 tune, ATLAS-CONF-2010-031 (2010).
    • [70] GEANT4 collaboration, S. Agostinelli et al., GEANT4: A Simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506 (2003) 250 [INSPIRE].
    • [71] ATLAS collaboration, The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C 70 (2010) 823 [arXiv:1005.4568] [INSPIRE].
    • [72] ATLAS collaboration, Improved luminosity determination in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2518 [arXiv:1302.4393] [INSPIRE].
    • [73] ATLAS collaboration, Electron reconstruction and identification efficiency measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2011 LHC proton-proton collision data, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2941 [arXiv:1404.2240] [INSPIRE].
    • [74] ATLAS collaboration, Muon reconstruction efficiency and momentum resolution of the ATLAS experiment in proton-proton collisions at √s = 7 TeV in 2010, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3034 [arXiv:1404.4562] [INSPIRE].
    • [75] ATLAS collaboration, Calorimeter Clustering Algorithms: Description and Performance, ATLAS-LARG-PUB-2008-002 (2008).
    • [76] ATLAS collaboration, Jet energy measurement with the ATLAS detector in proton-proton collisions at √s = 7 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2304 [arXiv:1112.6426] [INSPIRE].
    • [77] ATLAS collaboration, Jet energy measurement and its systematic uncertainty in proton-proton collisions at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 17 [arXiv:1406.0076] [INSPIRE].
    • [78] ATLAS collaboration, Commissioning of the ATLAS high-performance b-tagging algorithms in the 7 TeV collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2011-102 (2011).
    • [79] ATLAS collaboration, Performance of Missing Transverse Momentum Reconstruction in Proton-Proton Collisions at 7 TeV with ATLAS, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1844 [arXiv:1108.5602] [INSPIRE].
    • [80] C.-H. Kom and W.J. Stirling, Charge asymmetry in W + jets production at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 69 (2010) 67 [arXiv:1004.3404] [INSPIRE].
    • [81] ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the top quark-pair production cross section with ATLAS in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1577 [arXiv:1012.1792] [INSPIRE].
    • [82] R.D. Ball et al., A first unbiased global NLO determination of parton distributions and their uncertainties, Nucl. Phys. B 838 (2010) 136 [arXiv:1002.4407] [INSPIRE].
    • [83] P.M. Nadolsky et al., Implications of CTEQ global analysis for collider observables, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 013004 [arXiv:0802.0007] [INSPIRE].
    • [89] G. D'Agostini, A Multidimensional unfolding method based on Bayes' theorem, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 362 (1995) 487 [INSPIRE].
    • [90] A. Valassi, Combining correlated measurements of several different physical quantities, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 500 (2003) 391 [INSPIRE].
    • [91] L. Lyons, D. Gibaut and P. Clifford, How to Combine Correlated Estimates of a Single Physical Quantity, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 270 (1988) 110 [INSPIRE].
    • [92] H1 collaboration, F.D. Aaron et al., Measurement of the Inclusive ep Scattering Cross Section at Low Q2 and x at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C 63 (2009) 625 [arXiv:0904.0929] [INSPIRE].
    • 1 Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
    • 2 Physics Department, SUNY Albany, Albany NY, United States of America
    • 3 Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB, Canada
    • 4 (a) Department of Physics, Ankara University, Ankara; (b) Department of Physics, Gazi University, Ankara; (c) Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul; (d) Division of Physics, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara, Turkey
    • 5 LAPP, CNRS/IN2P3 and Universit´e de Savoie, Annecy-le-Vieux, France
    • 6 High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne IL, United States of America
    • 7 Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ, United States of America
    • 8 Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington TX, United States of America
    • 9 Physics Department, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
    • 10 Physics Department, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou, Greece
    • 11 Institute of Physics, Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences, Baku, Azerbaijan
    • 12 Institut de F´ısica d'Altes Energies and Departament de F´ısica de la Universitat Aut`onoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
    • 13 (a) Institute of Physics, University of Belgrade, Belgrade; (b) Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
    • 14 Department for Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
    • 15 Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and University of California, Berkeley CA, United States of America
    • 16 Department of Physics, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
    • 17 Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics and Laboratory for High Energy Physics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
    • 18 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    • 19 (a) Department of Physics, Bogazici University, Istanbul; (b) Department of Physics, Dogus University, Istanbul; (c) Department of Physics Engineering, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey
    • 20 (a) INFN Sezione di Bologna; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Universit`a di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
    • 21 Physikalisches Institut, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    • 22 Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston MA, United States of America
    • 23 Department of Physics, Brandeis University, Waltham MA, United States of America
    • 24 (a) Universidade Federal do Rio De Janeiro COPPE/EE/IF, Rio de Janeiro; (b) Electrical Circuits Department, Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora; (c) Federal University of Sao Joao del Rei (UFSJ), Sao Joao del Rei; (d) Instituto de Fisica, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    • 25 Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton NY, United States of America
    • 26 (a) National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest; (b) National Institute for Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies, Physics Department, Cluj Napoca; (c) University Politehnica Bucharest, Bucharest; (d) West University in Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania
    • 27 Departamento de F´ısica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
    • 28 Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    • 29 Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa ON, Canada
    • 30 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
    • 31 Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago IL, United States of America
    • 32 (a) Departamento de F´ısica, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile, Santiago; (b) Departamento de F´ısica, Universidad T´ecnica Federico Santa Mar´ıa, Valpara´ıso, Chile
    • 33 (a) Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; (b) Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui; (c) Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Jiangsu; (d) School of Physics, Shandong University, Shandong; (e) Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai; (f) Physics Department, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    • 34 Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire, Clermont Universit´e and Universit´e Blaise Pascal and CNRS/IN2P3, Clermont-Ferrand, France
    • 35 Nevis Laboratory, Columbia University, Irvington NY, United States of America
    • 36 Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
    • 37 (a) INFN Gruppo Collegato di Cosenza, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit`a della Calabria, Rende, Italy
    • 38 (a) AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Krakow; (b) Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
    • 39 The Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
    • 40 Physics Department, Southern Methodist University, Dallas TX, United States of America
    • 41 Physics Department, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson TX, United States of America
    • 42 DESY, Hamburg and Zeuthen, Germany
    • 43 Institut fu¨r Experimentelle Physik IV, Technische Universita¨t Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
    • 44 Institut fu¨r Kern- und Teilchenphysik, Technische Universita¨t Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    • 45 Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham NC, United States of America
    • 46 SUPA - School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • 47 INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
    • 48 Fakulta¨t fu¨r Mathematik und Physik, Albert-Ludwigs-Universita¨t, Freiburg, Germany
    • 49 Section de Physique, Universit´e de Gen`eve, Geneva, Switzerland
    • 50 (a) INFN Sezione di Genova; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit`a di Genova, Genova, Italy
    • 51 (a) E. Andronikashvili Institute of Physics, Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi; (b) High Energy Physics Institute, Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
    • 52 II Physikalisches Institut, Justus-Liebig-Universita¨t Giessen, Giessen, Germany
    • 53 SUPA - School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • 135 (a) INFN Sezione di Roma Tre; (b) Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Universit`a Roma Tre, Roma, Italy
    • 136 (a) Facult´e des Sciences Ain Chock, R´eseau Universitaire de Physique des Hautes Energies - Universit´e Hassan II, Casablanca; (b) Centre National de l'Energie des Sciences Techniques Nucleaires, Rabat; (c) Facult´e des Sciences Semlalia, Universit´e Cadi Ayyad, LPHEA-Marrakech; (d) Facult´e des Sciences, Universit´e Mohamed Premier and LPTPM, Oujda; (e) Facult´e des sciences, Universit´e Mohammed V-Agdal, Rabat, Morocco
    • 137 DSM/IRFU (Institut de Recherches sur les Lois Fondamentales de l'Univers), CEA Saclay (Commissariat `a l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives), Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    • 138 Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz CA, United States of America
    • 139 Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle WA, United States of America
    • 140 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
    • 141 Department of Physics, Shinshu University, Nagano, Japan
    • 142 Fachbereich Physik, Universita¨t Siegen, Siegen, Germany
    • 143 Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby BC, Canada
    • 144 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford CA, United States of America
    • 145 (a) Faculty of Mathematics, Physics & Informatics, Comenius University, Bratislava; (b) Department of Subnuclear Physics, Institute of Experimental Physics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Kosice, Slovak Republic
    • 146 (a) Department of Physics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town; (b) Department of Physics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg; (c) School of Physics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
    • 147 (a) Department of Physics, Stockholm University; (b) The Oskar Klein Centre, Stockholm, Sweden
    • 148 Physics Department, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    • 149 Departments of Physics & Astronomy and Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook NY, United States of America
    • 150 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
    • 151 School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    • 152 Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
    • 153 Department of Physics, Technion: Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
    • 154 Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    • 155 Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
    • 156 International Center for Elementary Particle Physics and Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    • 157 Graduate School of Science and Technology, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
    • 158 Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
    • 159 Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto ON, Canada
    • 160 (a) TRIUMF, Vancouver BC; (b) Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto ON, Canada
    • 161 Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
    • 162 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University, Medford MA, United States of America
    • 163 Centro de Investigaciones, Universidad Antonio Narino, Bogota, Colombia
    • 164 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California Irvine, Irvine CA, United States of America
    • 165 (a) INFN Gruppo Collegato di Udine, Sezione di Trieste, Udine; (b) ICTP, Trieste; (c) Dipartimento di Chimica, Fisica e Ambiente, Universit`a di Udine, Udine, Italy
    • 166 Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana IL, United States of America
    • 167 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
    • 168 Instituto de F´ısica Corpuscular (IFIC) and Departamento de F´ısica At´omica, Molecular y Nuclear and Departamento de Ingenier´ıa Electr´onica and Instituto de Microelectr´onica de Barcelona (IMB-CNM), University of Valencia and CSIC, Valencia, Spain
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Published in

Funded by projects

  • EC | EPLANET
  • SNSF | Teilchenphysik-Experimente...

Related to

  • egiEGI virtual organizations: atlas

Cite this article