LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Scarbrough, H.; Robertson, M.; Swan, J. (2015)
Publisher: Wiley
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HD28, HD
Recent work has questioned the institutional model of management innovation by highlighting interactions between the field-level actors engaged in diffusing innovations and implementation of the innovation at organization level. Focusing on the adaptation of management innovations to their context, rather than their creation, we review this work and use it to analyse the global diffusion of resource planning (RP), counter posing this case with the widely studied example of total quality management. Both of these innovations experienced a high level of failure when implemented by organizations. Total quality management's diffusion was characterized by a ‘boom and bust’ cycle. RP, however, has continued to spread globally in the form of its variants: MRP, MRPII and ERP. Our analysis seeks to account for the long-run diffusion of RP through a processual model which highlights the interplay between RP's discursive framing at field level, the affordances of the innovation itself and its adaptation within organizations. This demonstrates how objectifying RP in software not only helped to spread the innovation but also allowed field-level actors to differentiate its development as a successful innovation from the many failures experienced by organizations attempting to adapt it.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abrahamson, E. (1991). 'Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations' , Academy of Management Review, 16, pp. 586-612.
    • Abrahamson, E. (1996). 'Management fashion', Academy of Management Review, 21, pp. 254- 285.
    • Abrahamson, E. and M. Eisenman (2008). 'Employee-management techniques: transient fads or trending fashions?', Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, pp. 719-744.
    • Adam, F. and D. Sammon (2004). The Enterprise Resource Planning Decade: Lessons Learned and Issues for the Future. London: Idea Group.
    • Aggarwal, S. (1985). 'MRP, JIT, OPT or FMS?', Harvard Business Review, 63, pp. 8-16.
    • Anderson, J. C. and R. G. Schroeder (1984). 'Getting results from your MRP system', Business Horizons, 27, pp. 57-64.
    • Anon (2000) 'What place MRPII in 2000? With Y2K over, manufacturers in the mid-market will need to capitalise on their manufacturing IT. But is MRPII up to the challenges of ebusiness?', Manufacturing Computing Solutions (2000), 6, pp. 14-19.
    • Ansari, S. M., P. C. Fiss and E. J. Zajac (2010). 'Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse', Academy of Management Review, 35, pp. 67-92.
    • Ansari S., J. Reinecke and A. Span (2014). 'How are practices made to vary? Managing practice adaptation in a multinational corporation', Organization Studies, 35, pp. 1245-1264 ASUG (2013). Americas SAP User Group at http://www.asug.com/membership (accessed 14th August 2013).
    • Barrett, M., L. Heracleous and G. Walsham (2013). 'A rhetorical approach to IT diffusion: reconceptualizing the ideology-framing relationship in computerization movements', MIS Quarterly, 37, pp. 201-220.
    • Basoglu, N., T. Daim and O. Kerimoglu (2007). 'Organizational adoption of enterprise resource planning systems: A conceptual framework', The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 18, pp. 73-97.
    • Battilana, J., B. Leca and E. Boxenbaum (2009). 'How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship', Academy of Management Annals, 3, pp. 65-107.
    • Beatty, C. (1992). 'Implementing advanced manufacturing technologies: Rules of the road', Sloan Management Review, 33, pp. 49-60.
    • Belt, B. (1979). 'Men, spindles and materials requirements planning: enhancing implementation', Production and Inventory Management, 20, pp. 54-65 Benders, J. and K. van Veen (2001). 'What's in a fashion? interpretative viability and management fashions', Organization, 8, pp. 33-53.
    • Benders, J., R. Batenburg and H. van der Blonk (2006). 'Sticking to standards: technical and other isomorphic pressures in deploying ERP-systems', Information and Management, 43, pp.194-203.
    • Birkinshaw, J., G. Hamel and M. Mol (2008). 'Management innovation', Academy of Management Review, 33, pp. 825-845.
    • Bradley, J. (2008). 'Management based critical success factors in the implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning systems', International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 9, pp. 175-200.
    • Brauch, K. (1988). 'Apprenticeships and MRPII', Computing Canada, 14, pp. 28-29.
    • Brown, A. D. (1993). 'Understanding technological change: the case of MRPII', International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 13, pp. 25-35.
    • Cadili, S. and E. Whitley (2005). 'On the interpretative flexibility of hosted ERP systems', The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14, pp. 167-195.
    • Callerman, T. E. and J. E. Heyl (1986). 'A model for material requirements planning implementation', International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 6, pp. 30-37.
    • Cerveny, R. P. and L. W. Scott (1989). 'A survey of MRP implementation', Production and Inventory Management Journal, 30, pp. 31-34.
    • Clark, P., S. Newell P. Burcher, D. Bennett, S. Sharifi, and J. Swan (1992). 'The decisionepisode framework and computer aided production management (CAPM)'. International Studies of Management and Organization, 22, pp. 69-80.
    • Cole, R. E. (1999). Managing Quality Fads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Cooper, R. B. and R. W. Zmud (1990). 'Information Technology Implementation Research - a Technological Diffusion Approach', Management Science, 36, pp. 123-139.
    • Cotteleer, M. (2002). ' ERP: Payoffs and Pitfalls'. Harvard Business School Working Knowledge.
    • http://hbsk.hbs.edu/item.jhtml?id=3141@t=operations.
    • Dacin, M., J., Goodstein and W.Scott, (2002). 'Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum' , Academy of Management Journal, 45, pp. 45-56.
    • Damanpour, F. (1987). 'The adoption of technological, administrative and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors' , Journal of Management, 13, pp. 675-688.
    • Damanpour, F. (2010). 'An Integration of Research Findings of Effects of Firm Size and Market Competition on Product and Process Innovations', British Journal of Management, 221, pp. 996-1010.
    • David, R. and D. Strang (2006). 'When fashion is fleeting: Transitory collective beliefs and the dynamics of TQM consulting' , Academy of Management Journal, 49, pp. 215-233.
    • Davis, E. (1978). 'Studies in Materials Requirements Planning: A Collection of Company Case Studies'. Falls Church, VA: APICS.
    • Dechow, N. and J. Mouritsen (2005). 'Enterprise resource planning systems, management control and the quest for integraton', Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30, pp. 691-733.
    • Deloitte (2012). 'ERP Investment Decisions'. Johannesburg: Deloitte.
    • Dery, K., D. Grant, B. Harley and C. Wright (2006). 'Work, organisation and enterprise resource planning systems: an alternative research agenda', New Technology, Work and Employment, 21, pp. 199-214.
    • Dezdar, S. and A. Sulaiman (2009). 'Successful enterprise resource planning implementation: taxonomy of critical factors', Industrial Management and Data Systems, 109, pp. 1037-1052.
    • Dimaggio, P. J. and W.Powell (1983). 'The Iron Cage Revisited - Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields', American Sociological Review, 48, pp.
    • Dorado, S. (2005). 'Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking, and convening', Organization Studies, 26, pp. 385-414.
    • Ehie, I. C. and M. Madsen (2005). 'Identifying critical issues in enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation', Computers in Industry, 56, pp. 545-557.
    • El Amrani, R., F. Rowe and B. Geffroy-Maronnat (2006). 'The effects of enterprise resource planning implementation strategy on cross-functionality', Information Systems Journal, 16, pp.
    • Ferlie, E., L. Fitzgerald, M. Wood and C. Hawkins (2005). 'The Nonspread of Innovations: The Mediating Role of Professionals', Academy of Management Journal, 48, pp. 117-134.
    • Finney, S. and M. Corbett (2007). 'ERP implementation: a compilation and analysis of critical success factors', Business Process Management Journal, 13, pp. 329-347.
    • Fiss, P. C. and E. J. Zajac (2006). 'The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling', Academy of Management Journal, 49, pp. 1173-1193.
    • Fitzgerald, L., E. Ferlie, M. Wood and C. Hawkins (2002). 'Interlocking interactions, the diffusion of innovations in health care', Human Relations, 55, pp. 1429-1449.
    • Fortuin, L. (1977). 'A survey of literature on reordering of stock items for production inventories', The International Journal of Production Research, 15, pp. 87-105.
    • Françoise, O., M. Bourgault and R. Pellerin (2009). 'ERP implementation through critical success factors' management', Business Process Management Journal, 15, pp. 371-394.
    • Garud, R., S. Jain and A. Kumaraswamy (2002). 'Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java'. Academy of Management Journal, 45, pp. 196-214.
    • Ghosh, S. and M. J. Skibniewski (2010). 'Enterprise resource planning systems implementation as a complex project: a conceptual framework', Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11, pp. 533-549.
    • Goodhue, D. and R. Thompson (1995). 'Task technology fit and individual performance', MIS Quarterly, 19, pp. 213-236.
    • Goodridge, M. (1988). 'Managing operations: Into the 1990s', Management Decision, 26, pp.5- 10.
    • Grabski, S. V., S. A. Leech and P. J. Schmidt (2011). 'A review of ERP research: A future agenda for accounting information systems', Journal of Information Systems, 25, pp. 37-78.
    • Greene, J. (1987). Production and Inventory Control Handbook (2nd Ed). New York: McGraw Hill.
    • Greenwood, R. and R. Suddaby (2006). 'Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms'. Academy of Management Journal, 49, pp. 27-48.
    • Greenwood, R., R. Suddaby and C. Hinings (2002). 'Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields', Academy of Management Journal, 45, pp. 58-80.
    • Guler, I., M. F. Guillén and J. M. Macpherson (2002). 'Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of ISO 9000 quality certificates', Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, pp. 207-232.
    • Hald, K. S. and J. Mouritsen (2013). 'ERP operations and management', International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 33, pp. 1075-1104.
    • Hardy, C., and S. Maguire (2010). 'Discourse, field-configuring events, and change in organizations and institutional fields: Narratives of DDT and the Stockholm Convention'. Academy of Management Journal, 53, pp. 1365-1392.
    • Hargadon, A., and Y. Douglas, Y. (2001). 'When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light', Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, pp. 476-501.
    • Henfridsson, O. and Y. Yoo (2013). 'The liminality of trajectory shifts in institutional entrepreneurship', Organization Science, 25, pp. 932-950.
    • Hong, K.-K. and Y.-G. Kim (2002). 'The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective', Information and Management, 40, pp. 25-40.
    • Hoyt, G. (1977). 'Successes and failures in MRP user involvement'. Proceedings of the APICS 20th Annual International Conference, Cleveland, USA, pp. 204-209.
    • Hutchby, I. (2001). 'Technologies, texts and affordances', Sociology, 35, pp. 441-456.
    • Jacobs, F. and F. Weston, F. (2007). 'Enterprise Resource Planning(ERP) - a brief history'.
    • Journal of Operations Management, 25, pp. 357-363.
    • Jacobson, S., S. Shepherd, M. D'Aquila and K. Carter (2007). 'The ERP Market Sizing Report, 2006-2011', AMR Consulting. http://www.gtm.sap.com/uk/solutions/businesssuite/erp/pdf/AMR_ERP_Market_Sizing_2006-2011.pdf (accessed 20th July, 2013).
    • Krupp, J. (1984). 'Why MRP systems fail: Traps to avoid', Production and Inventory Management, 25, pp. 48-53.
    • Lawrence. B. 1984. 'Historical perspective: Using the past to study the present', Academy of Management Review, 9, pp. 307-312.
    • Lawrence, T. and R. Suddaby (2006). 'Institutions and institutional work'. In S. Clegg, C.Hardy, T.Lawrence, and W. Nord (eds), The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, pp.
    • 215-254. London:Sage.
    • Leblebici, H., G. Salancik, A. Copay and T. King, (1991). 'Institutional change and the transformation of inter-organizational fields: An organizational history of the U.S. radio broadcasting industry', Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, pp.333-363.
    • Leonardi, P. M. (2008). 'Indeterminacy and the discourse of inevitability in international technology management', Academy of Management Review, 33, pp. 975-984.
    • Markus, M. L. (2004). 'Technochange management: using IT to drive organizational change', Journal of Information Technology, 19, pp. 4-20.
    • Markus, L. and C. Tanis (1999). 'The enterprise systems experience - From adoption to success'. In R.W. Zmud (ed.) Framing the Domains of IT Research: Glimpsing the Future Through the Past, pp.1-46, Cincinnati: Pinnaflex Educational Resources Inc.
    • Maskell, B. (1993). 'Why hasn't MRPII created world class manufacturing: where do we go from here?', Financial Management, 71, pp. 48-51.
    • McDermott, A. M., L. Fitzgerald and D. A. Buchanan (2013). 'Beyond acceptance and resistance: entrepreneurial change agency responses in policy implementation', British Journal of Management, 24, pp. S93-S115.
    • Meyer, J. and B.Rowan (1977). 'Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony', American Journal of Sociology, 83, pp. 340-363.
    • Miller, J. (1981). 'Fit productions systems to the task', Harvard Business Review, 59, pp. 145-54.
    • Schmenner (1981). 'Production/operations management: agenda for the'80s', Decision Sciences, 12, pp. 547-571.
    • Schroeder, R. G., J. C. Anderson, S. E. Tupy and E. M. White (1981). 'A study of MRP benefits and costs', Journal of Operations Management, 2, pp. 1-9.
    • Scott, J. E., and L. Kaindl (2000). 'Enhancing functionality in an enterprise software package', Information and Management, 37, pp. 111-122.
    • Shaul, L. and D. Tauber (2013). 'Critical success factors in enterprise resource planning systems: Review of the last decade', ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 45, p. 55.
    • Sillince, J. and G. Sykes (1993). 'Integrating MRPII and JIT: A management rather than technical challenge', International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 13, pp.18- 30.
    • Skok, W. and M. Legge (2002). 'Evaluating enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems using an interpretive approach', Knowledge and Process Management, 9, pp. 72-82.
    • Standish Group (2013). ERP Failure Rates. www.it-cortex.com/Stat_Failure_Rate.htm, (accessed 20th July 2013).
    • Steele, D. C. (1975). 'The nervous MRP system: how to do battle', Production and Inventory Management, 16, pp. 83-89.
    • Strang, D. and J. Meyer (1993). 'Institutional Conditions for Diffusion' , Theory and Society, 22, pp. 487-511.
    • Strang, D. and M. Macy (2001). 'In Search of Excellence: Fads, Success Stories, and Adaptive Emulation', American Journal of Sociology, 107, pp. 147-182.
    • Suddaby, R. and R. Greenwood (2001). 'Colonizing knowledge: Commodification as a dynamic of jurisdictional expansion in professional service firms', Human Relations, 54, pp.
    • Sum, C.-C., J. S. Ang and L.-N. Yeo (1997). 'Contextual elements of critical success factors in MRP implementation', Production and Inventory Management Journal, 38, pp. 77-83.
    • Swan, J. A. and P. Clark (1992). 'Organisational decision-making in the appropriation of technological innovation: Cognitive and political dimension', European Work and Organisational Psychologist, 2, pp. 103-127.
    • Swan, J., S. Newell and M. Robertson (1999a). 'Central agencies in the diffusion and design of technology: a comparison of the UK and Sweden', Organization Studies, 20, pp. 905-932.
    • Swan, J.A., S. Newell and M. Robertson (1999b). 'National differences in the diffusion and design of technological innovation: the role of inter-organizational networks. British Journal of Management', 10, pp. S45-S61 Swan, J., S. Newell and M. Robertson (1999c). 'The illusion of best practice in information systems for operations management', European Journal of Information Systems, 8, pp. 284-293.
    • Swanson, E. B. and N. C. Ramiller (1997). 'The organizing vision in information systems innovation', Organization Science, 8, pp. 458-474.
    • Themistocleous, M., Z. Irani and R. O'Keefe (2001). 'ERP and Application Integration: Exploratory Survey', Business Process Management Journal, 7, pp.195-204.
    • Tolbert, P. and L. Zucker (1983). 'Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal-Structure of Organizations - the Diffusion of Civil-Service Reform, 1880- 1935', Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, pp. 22-39.
    • Umble, E. J., R. R. Haft and M. M. Umble (2003). 'Enterprise resource planning: Implementation procedures and critical success factors', European Journal of Operational Research, 146, pp. 241-257.
    • Vaccaro, I., J. Jansen, F. Van Den Bosch and H. Volberda (2012). 'Management innovation and leadership: The moderating role of organizational size', Journal of Management Studies, 49, pp. 28-51.
    • Van De Ven, A and G. Huber (1990). 'Longitudinal field study methods for studying processes of organizational change', Organization Science, 1, pp. 213-219 Wagner, E. and S. Newell (2004). 'Best for whom?: the tension between 'best practice' ERP packages and diverse epistemic cultures in a university context', The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 13, pp. 305-328.
    • Wang, E., C. Lin, J. Jiang and G. Klein, (2007). ' Improving enterprise resource planning (ERP) fit to organizational process through knowledge transfer', International Journal of Information Management, 27, pp. 200-212.
    • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
    • Westphal, J. and E. Zajac (2001). 'Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchase programs', Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, pp. 202-228.
    • Westphal, J., R. Gulati and S. Shortell (1997). 'Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption', Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, pp. 366-394.
    • White, E., J. Anderson, R. Schroeder and S. Tupy (1982). 'A study of the MRP implementation process', Journal of Production and Operations Management, 2, pp. 145-153.
    • Wight, O. (1974). Production and Inventory Management in the Computer Age. Boston: Cahners.
    • Wylie, L. (1990). 'A Vision of Next Generation MRP II', Scenario S-300-339, Gartner Group, April 12, 1990
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article