LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Allen, Pauline; Turner, Simon; Bartlett, Will; Perotin, Virginie; Matchaya, Greenwell; Zamora, Bernarda (2012)
Publisher: Royal Society of Medicine Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: health care economics and organizations
Objectives: The overall objective of the research was to assess the impact of provider diversity on quality\ud and innovation in the English NHS. The aims were to map the extent of diverse provider activity, identify\ud the differences in performance between Third Sector Organisations (TSOs), for-profit private enterprises,\ud and incumbent organisations within the NHS, and the factors that affect the entry and growth of new\ud private and TSOs.\ud Methods: Case studies of four Local Health Economies (LHEs). Data included: semi-structured\ud interviews with 48 managerial and clinical staff from NHS organizations and providers from the private\ud and Third Sector; some documentary evidence; a focus group with service users; and routine data from\ud the Care Quality Commission and Companies House. Data collection was mainly between November\ud 2008 and November 2009.\ud Results: Involvement of diverse providers in the NHS is limited. Commissioners’ local strategies\ud influence degrees of diversity. Barriers to the entry for TSOs include lack of economies of scale in the\ud bidding process. Private providers have greater concern to improve patient pathways and patient\ud experience, whereas TSOs deliver quality improvements by using a more holistic approach and a greater\ud degree of community involvement. Entry of new providers drives NHS Trusts to respond by making\ud improvements. Information sharing diminishes as competition intensifies.\ud Conclusions: There is scope to increase the participation of diverse providers in the NHS, but care must\ud be taken not to damage public accountability, overall productivity, equity and NHS providers (especially\ud acute hospitals, which are likely to remain in the NHS) in the process.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Edwards, N. and Lewis, R. (2008) 'Who owns and operates healthcare providers and does it matter?' Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 101(2): 54-58
    • Department of Health (2005) Health reform in England: update and next steps. London: Department of Health.
    • Department of Health (2010) Equity and Excellence: liberating the NHS London: SO
    • 4. House of Commons Health Select Committee (2006) Independent Sector Treatment Centres. Fourth Report of Session 2005-06. London: The Stationary Office.
    • 5. Pollock, A and Godden, S. (2008) 'Independent Sector Treatment Centres: evidence so far' British Medical Journal 335: 421-424
    • 6. Allen, P. (2009) 'Restructuring the NHS again: supply side reform in recent English health care policy' Financial Accountability and Management, 25(4): 343-389
    • 7. Williamson, O. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Free Press, New York)
    • 8. Roberts, J. (1993), 'Managing Markets' Journal of Public Health Medicine 15,4: 305-3
    • 9. Ashton, T. (1997) 'Contracting for health services in New Zealand: a transaction cost analysis' Social Science and Medicine 46(3); 357- 367
    • 10. Croxson, B. (1999), Organisational Costs in the New NHS: an introduction to the transaction costs and internal costs of delivering health care Office Of Health Economics: London
    • 11. Allen, P. (2002), A socio-legal analysis of contracting in the NHS internal market using a case study of contracting for district nursing, Social Sciences and Medicine, 54: 255-66
    • 12. Petsoulas, C., Allen, P., Hughes, D., Vincent-Jones, P. and Roberts, J. 'Contracts in England's new NHS market: continuity and change' under review
    • 13. Preker, A. A. Harding. P. Travis (2000), 'Make or buy decisions in the production of healthcare goods and services: new insights from institutional economics and organisational theory' Bulletin of the WHO 78 (6) 779-790
    • 14. Vincent-Jones, P. (2006) The new public contracting: regulation, responsiveness, relationality Oxford University Press, Oxford
    • 15. Anderson, K. (2006). Independent Sector Treatment Centres: A report from Ken Anderson, Commercial Director, Department of Health, to the Secretary of State for Health. London: Department of Health.
    • 16. Healthcare Commission and Audit Commission (2008) Is the treatment working? Progress with NHS system reform programme. London: Healthcare Commission.
    • 17. Browne, J., Jamieson, L., Lewsey, J., Van der Meulen, J., Copley, L. and Black, N. (2008) 'Case-mix and patients' reports of outcome in Independent Sector Treatment Centres: Comparison with NHS providers', BMC Health Services Research, 78: 1-7.
    • 18. Healthcare Commission (2007) Independent Sector Treatment Centres. London: Healthcare Commission.
    • 19. Department of Health (2006) Our health, our care, our say: a new direction for community services, White Paper, Norwich: TSO.
    • 20. Allen, P., Bartlett, W., Perotin, V., Zamora, B. and Turner, S. (2011) 'New forms of provider in the English National Health Service' Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 82:1 77-95
    • 21. Department of Health (2006) Our health, our care, our say: a new direction for community services, White Paper, Norwich: TSO
    • 22. Tribal (2010) Social Enterprises Pathfinder Evaluation Final Report London, Department of Health
    • 23. Vining & Globerman, (1999) 'Contracting-out health care services: a conceptual framework' Health Policy 46 77-96
    • 24. Sloan, F., Picone, G., Taylor, D., and Chou, S. ( 2001) “Hospital ownership and cost and quality of care: Is there a dime's worth of difference?” Journal of Health Economics, 20, 1-21.
    • 25. Eggleston, K., Shen, Y., Lau, J., Schmid, C and Chan, J. (2008) “Hospital Ownership and Quality of Care: What Explains the Different Results in the Literature?” Health Economics. 17 (12). 1345-62
    • 26. Perotin, V., Zamora, B., Reeves, R., Bartlett, W., Allen, P. (2010) Does hospital ownership affect patient experience? An investigation into public-private sector differences in England (under review)
    • 27. George, A, and Bennett, A. (2005) Case studies and theory development in the social sciences MIT Press, Cambridge MA
    • 28. Miles, M. (1979) 'Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance- the problem of analysis.' Administrative Science Quarterly 24(4): 590-594
    • 29. Maude, F. (2010) 'Francis Maude launches pathfinder mutuals' Cabinet Office Press Release 12 August http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/newsroom/news_releases/2010/100812-pathfinder-mutuals.aspx
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article