Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Duncan, J.
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: HD
This research explores the reformed UN Committee on World Food Security (CFS) as an institution addressing a changed world, and as an illustration of evolving global food security governance. The research sets out to answer the extent to which the CFS is realising its reform objectives and how it is positioning itself within a changing architecture of global food security governance.\ud \ud Informed by literature on global governance and embedded neoliberalism, the inquiry centres around three case studies – Civil Society Mechanism, Voluntary Guidelines for the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests, and the Global Strategic Framework – which serve to highlight the operationalization of key reform objectives while simultaneously providing insight into broader policy processes and dynamics. Data was collected through document analysis, participant observation, and interviews. The resulting analysis provides clear evidence of the impact of enhanced participation on policy outcomes and concludes that the policy recommendations emerging from the CFS are amongst the most comprehensive and useful in terms of applicability and uptake at the national and regional level. The analysis also reveals that despite its methods, outcomes and mandate, the CFS is being systematically undermined by other actors seeking to maintain influence and sustain neoliberal hegemony across food security policies at the global level.\ud \ud The research contributes to global governance theory by describing the functioning of a mechanisms that can address democratic deficits in global governance while elucidating related opportunities and challenges. The research also contributes to scholarship on global food security policy by challenging the application of previous analyses to the contemporary reality. The research addresses limitations in global governance literature by mapping the complexity of social and political relations across sites of negotiation, contestation and compromise between actors. The policy implications derived from this thesis focus on the need to further problematize food security and for policies to target structural causes of food insecurity. Building on the experiences of the CFS, this thesis concludes that transparent, participatory mechanisms need to be created which acknowledge, and seek to rectify, existing imbalances in power relations in policy-making processes.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abbott, P., Hurt, C. , and Tyner, W. 2008. What's Driving Food Prices?". Oak Brook, IL.
    • Ahmad, M. 2011. Improving the international governance of food security and trade. Geneva.
    • Alinovi, L., D'Errico, M., Mane, E, and Romano, D. 2010. “Livelihoods strategies and household resilience to Food insecurity : an empirical analysis to Kenya.” in Promoting Resilience through Social Protection in Sub-Saharan Africa. Dakar, Senegal: European Report of Development.
    • Arezki, R., Deininger, K. and Selod, H. 2012. “Global Land Rush.” Finance and Development 49(1):46-48.
    • Arusa, K. 2011. “End of cheap food era as grain prices stay high.” Reuters, January 24.
    • Atkinson, P., and Hammerslet, M. 1998. “Ethnography and participant observation.” Pp. 110- 36 in Strategies in qualitative inquiry, edited by N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Baffes, J., and Haniotis, T.. 2010. Placing the 2006/08 Commodity Price Boomn into Perspective (Policy Research Working Paper5371 (WSPS5371)). Washington, D.C.
    • Barling, D. 2012. “The challenges facing contemporary food systems: policy and governance pathways to sustainable consumption and production.” Agronomie, Environnment et Societes 2(1):15-25.
    • Beck, U. 2005. Power in the Global Age: A New Global Political Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Behrman, J., Meinzen-Dick, R. and Quisumbing, A. 2012. “The gender implications of largescale land deals.” Journal of Peasant Studies 39(1):49-79.
    • Ben-David, D., Nordström, H. and Winters, A. 1999. Trade, Income Disparity and Poverty. Geneva.
    • Bennett, A., and Elman, C. 2007. “Case Study Methods in the International Relations Subfield.” Comparative Political Studies 40(2):170-95.
    • Benvenisti, E., and Down, G. W. 2007. “The Empire's New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law.” Stanford Law Review 60(2):595-631.
    • Bernstein, S., and Cashore, B. 2000. “Globalization, Four Paths of Internationalization, and Domestic Policy Change: The Case of Ecoforestry in British Columbia, Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 33:67-99.
    • Borras, S. M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., White, B., and Wolford, W. 2011. “Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: an editorial introduction.” Journal of Peasant Studies 38(2):209-16.
    • Boström, M., and Hallström, K. 2010. “The Fragile Authority of Multi-Stakeholder Standard Setting.” in Re-Discovering International Organizations, vol. 2011. Stockholm. 262
    • Brühl, T., and Rittberger, V.. 2001. “From international to global governance: Actors, collective decision-making, and the United Nations in the world of the twenty-first century.” Pp. 1- 47 in, edited by V Rittberger. NY: United Nations University Press.
    • Buchanan, A., and. Keohane, R. 2006. “The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions.” Ethics & International Affairs 20(4):405-37.
    • Bulmer, S. 1998. “New institutionalism and the governance of the Single European Market.” Journal of European Public Policy 5(3):365-86.
    • Bundestag, D. 2002. Study Commission,: Globalization of the World Economy: Challenges and Answers. Short Version of the Final Report.
    • Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. 1991. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Busch, L., and C. Bain. 2004. “New! Improved? The Transformation of the Global Agrifood System.” Rural Sociology 60(3):321-46.
    • Cameron, D. 2012. “A G8 meeting that goes back to first principles.” euobserver.com (opinion), November.
    • Cardoso, F. H. 2003. Civil society and global Governance: Contextual paper prepared by the Panel's Chairman.
    • Cerny, P. 2008. “Embedding neoliberalism: The evolution of a hegemonic paradigm.” The Journal of International Trade and Diplomacy 2(1):1-46.
    • Cerny, P. 2009. “Neoliberalization and place: deconstructing and reconstructing borders.” Pp. 13-39 in, edited by B Arts, A Lagendijk, and H van Houtum. Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Cerny, P. 2010a. Rethinking world politics: A theory of transnational pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Cerny, P. 2010b. Rethinking World Politics: A Theory of Transnatonal Neopluralism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    • CFS. 1999. Report of the 25th Session of the Committee on World Food Security. Rome.
    • CFS. 2008. Proposals to Strengthen the Committee on World Food Security to Meet New Challenges (CFS:2008/6). Rome.
    • CFS. 2009a. Reform of the Committee on World Food Security Final Version. Rome.
    • De Schutter, O. 2011. “How not to think of land-grabbing: Three critiques of large-scale investments in farmland.” Journal of Peasant Studies 38(2):249-79.
    • De Schutter, O. 2012. “Global Governance.” 2012(7/24/2012). Retrieved November 15, 2012 (http://www.srfood.org/index.php/en/areas-of-work/policy-making/global-governance).
    • De Schutter, O. 2013. Mission to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. New York.
    • Deere, C., and Leon, M.. 1997. Women and Land Rights in the Latin American Neo-Liberal Counter-Reforms.
    • DEFRA. 2010. The 2007/8 Agricultural Price Spikes: Causes and Policy Implications.
    • Deininger, K., Jin, S., & Nagaranjan, H. K. 2007. “Land reforms, poverty reduction, and economic growth: Evidence from India.” Journal of Development Studies 45(4):496-521.
    • Demeke, M., Pangrazio, G. and Maetz, M. 2009. Initiative on Soaring Food Prices Country Responses to the Food Security Crisis : Nature and Preliminary Implications of the Policies Pursued. Rome.
    • Destler, I. M. 1978. “United States food policy 1972-1976: Reconciling domestic and international objectives.” International Organization 3(617-653).
    • Devereux, S. 2001. “Sen's Entitlement Approach: Critiques and Counter-critiques.” Oxford Development Studies 29(3):245-63.
    • Devereux, S., and Maxwell, S. 2001. Food security in Sub-Saharan Africa. London: ITDG.
    • Dingwerth, K., and Pattberg, P. 1996. “Global Governance as a Perspective on World Politics.” Global Governance 12(2):185-203.
    • Domosh, M. 2003. “Toward a More Fully Reciprocal Feminist Inquiry.” ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 2(1):107-11.
    • Duncan, J., and .Barling, D. 2012. “Renewal through Participation in Global Food Security Governance: Implementing the International Food Security and Nutrition Civil Society Mechanism to the Committee on World Food Security.” International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 19:143-61.
    • Duncan, J. and von Anrep, A. 2010. Civil Society Consultation to the 36th Session of the Committee on World Food Security. Rome.
    • Dunsire, A. 1993. Manipulating Social Tensions: Collibration as an Alternative Mode of Government Intervention (MPIFG Discussion Paper 93/7). Köln.
    • Evans, G. 2012. “Practicing Participant Observation: an anthropologist's account.” Journal of Organizational Ethnography 1(1):96-106.
    • Fan, S., and Rao, N. 2003. Public Spending in Developing in Developing Countries: Trends, determination and impact. EPTD Discussion Paper NO. 99.
    • FAO. 1974. Report of the 64th Session of the Council of the FAO. Rome.
    • FAO. 1981. FAO: its origins, formation and evolution 1945-1981. Rome.
    • FAO. 1983. Resolution 2/83 on World Food Security: Report of the Conference of the FAO, Twenty Second Session (5-23 November).
    • FAO. 2009e. The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2009: Economic crises- impacts and lessons learned. Rome, UN: United Nations.
    • Foucault, M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978--1979 (Lectures at the College de France). London: Picador.
    • Friedmann, H., and McMichael, P. 1989. “Agriculture and the State System: The Rise and Fall of National agricultures, 1870 to the present.” Sociologia Ruralis 29(2):93-117.
    • G20. 2009. The Pittsburg Summit: Partnering on Food Security. Pittsburg.
    • Grande, E., and Pauly, L. 2005. Complex Sovereignty: Responstituting Political Authority in the Twenty-First Century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    • Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N. and Stewart, R.. 2005. “THE EMERGENCE OF GLOBAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.” Law and Contemporary Problems 68:15-61.
    • Koskenniemi, M. 2007. “Constitutionalism as Mindset: Reflections on Kantian Themes about International Law and Globalisation.” Theoretical Inquires in Law 1(8):9-36.
    • Kurzman, C. 2008. “Meaning-Making in Social Movements.” Anthropological Quarterly 81(1):5-15.
    • Lake, D. 1999. “Global Governance: A relational contracting approach.” Pp. 31-53 in Globalization and Governance, edited by Aseem Prakash and Jeffrey A. Hart. London: Routledge.
    • Nagar, R., and Ali, R.. 2003. “Collaboration across borders: moving beyond positionality.” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 24(3):356-72.
    • USA. 2011. Food Prices Crisis of 2007-2008: Lessons Learned. Washington, D.C.
    • World Trade Organization. 2011. “Lamy rebuts UN food rapporteur's claim that WTO talks hold food rights 'hostage'.” News Items. Retrieved December 14, 2011 (http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news11_e/agcom_14dec11_e.htm).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article