Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Sherratt, FC; Newson, LM; Marcus, MW; Field, JK; Robinson, J
Publisher: Wiley
Languages: English
Types: Article
OBJECTIVES: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are promoted as smoking cessation tools, yet they remain unavailable from Stop Smoking Services in England; the debate over their safety and efficacy is ongoing. This study was designed to explore perceptions and reasons for use or non-use of electronic cigarettes as smoking cessation tools, among individuals engaged in Stop Smoking Services. METHODS: Semi-structured telephone interviews were undertaken with twenty participants engaged in Stop Smoking Services in the north-west of England. Participants comprised of both individuals who had tried e-cigarettes (n = 6) and those who had not (n = 14). Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were subject to thematic analysis, which explored participants' beliefs and experiences of e-cigarettes. RESULTS: A thematic analysis of transcripts suggested that the following three superordinate themes were prominent: (1) self-efficacy and beliefs in e-cigarettes; (2) e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation aid; and (3) cues for e-cigarette use. Participants, particularly never users, were especially concerned regarding e-cigarette efficacy and safety. Overall, participants largely expressed uncertainty regarding e-cigarette safety and efficacy, with some evidence of misunderstanding. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of uncertainty and misunderstanding regarding information on e-cigarettes highlights the importance of providing smokers with concise, up-to-date information regarding e-cigarettes, enabling smokers to make informed treatment decisions. Furthermore, identification of potential predictors of e-cigarette use can be used to inform Stop Smoking Services provision and future research. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Research suggests that e-cigarettes may help smokers quit smoking, but further studies are needed. Electronic cigarette use in Stop Smoking Services has increased substantially in recent years, although e-cigarettes are currently not regulated. There is debate within the academic community regarding e-cigarette efficacy and safety. What does this study add? Service users interviewed in the current study felt uncertain regarding e-cigarette efficacy and safety. E-cigarette ever users viewed e-cigarettes as effective and safe, more often than never users. Accurate and up-to-date education will enable service users to make informed treatment decisions.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749- 5978(91)90020-T
    • Allehebi, R. O., Khan, M. H., & Stanbrook, M. B. (2015). Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: A systematic review. Paper presented at the American Thoracic Society International Conference, Denver, Colorado. Retrieved 26th May 2015, from http://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1164/ajrccmconference.2015.191.1_MeetingAbstracts.A3715
    • Ashton, J. R. (2014). Regulation of electronic cigarettes. BMJ, 349, g5484. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5484
    • Barbeau, A. M., Burda, J., & Siegel, M. (2013). Perceived efficacy of e-cigarettes versus nicotine replacement therapy among successful e-cigarette users: a qualitative approach. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 8(3), 1. doi: 10.1186/1940-0640-8-5
    • Bauld, L., Angus, K., & De Andrade, M. (2014). E-cigarette uptake and marketing: A report commissioned by Public Health England. London: Public Health England.
    • Beard, E., Brose, L. S., Brown, J., West, R., & McEwen, A. (2014). How are the English Stop Smoking Services responding to growth in use of electronic cigarettes? Patient Educ Couns, 94(2), 276-281. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.022
    • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014). What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers? International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 9, 10.3402/qhw.v3409.26152. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v9.26152
    • Ferguson, J., Bauld, L., Chesterman, J., & Judge, K. (2005). The English smoking treatment services: One-year outcomes. Addiction, 100 Suppl 2, 59-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1360- 0443.2005.01028.x
    • Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (2008). Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    • Gough, B., Fry, G., Grogan, S., & Conner, M. (2009). Why do young adult smokers continue to smoke despite the health risks? A focus group study. Psychol Health, 24(2), 203- 220. doi: 10.1080/08870440701670570
    • Hiscock, R., Goniewicz, M. L., McEwen, A., Murray, S., Arnott, D., Dockrell, M., & Bauld, L. (2014). E-cigarettes: Online survey of UK smoking cessation practitioners. Tob Induc Dis, 12(1), 13. doi: 10.1186/1617-9625-12-13
    • Irvine, A., Drew, P., & Sainsbury, R. (2013). 'Am I not answering your questions properly?' Clarification, adequacy and responsiveness in semi-structured telephone and face-toface interviews. Qualitative Research, 13(1), 87-106. doi: 10.1177/1468794112439086
    • Judge, K., Bauld, L., Chesterman, J., & Ferguson, J. (2005). The English smoking treatment services: Short-term outcomes. Addiction, 100 Suppl 2, 46-58.
    • McQueen, A., Tower, S., & Sumner, W. (2011). Interviews with “vapers”: Implications for future research with electronic cigarettes. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 13(9), 860- 867. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr088
    • McRobbie, H., Bullen, C., Hartmann-Boyce, J., & Hajek, P. (2014). Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation and reduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 12, Cd010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub2
    • Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulator Agency [MHRA]. (2013). Nicotine Containing Products. Retrieved 5th September 2014 (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6I89OvSYh)
    • National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training. (2014). Electronic cigarettes. London: NCSCT.
    • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). (2013). Public health guidance 45. Tobacco: Harm-reduction approaches to smoking. Retrieved 10th December 2014, from http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/PH45
    • QSR International. (2012). NVivo 10 [computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.qsrinternational.com
    • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
    • Sherratt, F. C., Marcus, M. W., Robinson, J., Newson, L., & Field, J. K. (2015). Electronic cigarette use and risk perception in a Stop Smoking Service in England. Addiction Research & Theory, 23(4), 336-342. doi: doi:10.3109/16066359.2015.1006629
    • Smith, J. A., Michie, S., Stephenson, M., & Quarrell, O. (2002). Risk Perception and decisionmaking processes in candidates for genetic testing for Huntington's disease: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. J Health Psychol, 7(2), 131-144. doi: 10.1177/1359105302007002398
    • Watson, M. C., & Forshaw, M. (2014). Re: Regulation of electronic cigarettes. BMJ, 349(g5484). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g5484
    • West, R., Beard, E., & Brown, J. (2015). Trends in electronic cigarette use in England [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved 20th May 2015, from http://www.smokinginengland.info/latest-statistics/
    • West, R., & Brown, J. (2014). Electronic cigarettes: Fact and faction. The British Journal Of General Practice: The Journal Of The Royal College Of General Practitioners, 64(626), 442-443. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X681253
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article