LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Glaister, Mark; Howatson, Glyn; Pattison, John R.; McInnes, Gill (2008)
Publisher: National Strength & Conditioning Association / Wolters-Kluwer
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: 796, 612
The ability to repeatedly produce a high-power output or sprint speed is a key fitness component of most field and court sports. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of eight different approaches to quantify this parameter in tests of multiple-sprint performance. Ten physically active men completed two trials of each of two multiple-sprint running protocols with contrasting recovery periods. Protocol 1 consisted of 12 × 30-m sprints repeated every 35 seconds; protocol 2 consisted of 12 × 30-m sprints repeated every 65 seconds. All testing was performed in an indoor sports facility, and sprint times were recorded using twin-beam photocells. All but one of the formulae showed good construct validity, as evidenced by similar within-protocol fatigue scores. However, the assumptions on which many of the formulae were based, combined with poor or inconsistent test-retest reliability (coefficient of variation range: 0.8-145.7%; intraclass correlation coefficient range: 0.09-0.75), suggested many problems regarding logical validity. In line with previous research, the results support the percentage decrement calculation as the most valid and reliable method of quantifying fatigue in tests of multiple-sprint performance.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 2. BARTKO, J. J. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep. 19: 3-11. 1966.
    • 3. BISHOP, D., M. SPENCER, R. DUFFIELD, AND S. LAWRENCE. The validity of a repeated sprint ability test. J Sci Med Sport. 4: 19-29. 2001
    • 5. DURNIN, J. V., AND J. WOMERSLEY. Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. Br J Nutr. 32: 77-97. 1974.
    • 6. FITZSIMONS, M., B. DAWSON, D. WARE, AND A. WILKINSON. Cycling and running tests of repeated sprint ability. Aust J Sci Med Sport. 25: 82-87. 1993.
    • 7. GLAISTER, M., G. HOWATSON, R. A. LOCKEY, C. ABRAHAM, J. GOODWIN, AND G. MCINNES. Familiarization and reliability of multiple sprint running performance indices. J Strength Cond Res. In Press. 2007.
    • 8. GLAISTER, M., R. A. LOCKEY, C. ABRAHAM, A. STAERCK, J. GOODWIN, AND G. MCINNES. Creatine supplementation and multiple sprint running performance. J Strength Cond Res. 20: 273-277. 2006.
    • 9. GLAISTER, M., M. H. STONE, A. M. STEWART, M. HUGHES, AND G. L. MOIR. Reliability of power output during short-duration maximal-intensity intermittent cycling. J Strength Cond Res. 17: 781-784. 2003.
    • 10. GLAISTER, M., M. H. STONE, A. M. STEWART, M. HUGHES, AND G. L. MOIR. The reliability and validity of fatigue measures during short-duration maximal-intensity intermittent cycling. J Strength Cond Res. 18: 459-462. 2004.
    • 11. GLAISTER, M., M. H. STONE, A. M. STEWART, M. HUGHES, AND G. L. MOIR. The influence of recovery duration on multiple sprint cycling performance. J Strength Cond Res. 19: 831-837. 2005.
    • 12. HAMILTON, A. L., M. E. NEVILL, S. BROOKS, AND C. WILLIAMS. Physiological responses to maximal intermittent exercise: differences between endurance-trained runners and games players. J Sports Sci. 9: 371-382. 1991.
    • 13. HOLMYARD, D. J., M. E. CHEETHAM, H. K. A. LAKOMY, AND C. WILLIAMS. Effect of recovery duration on performance during multiple treadmill sprints. In: Science and Football. T. Reilly, A. Lees, K. Davids, and W. J. Murphy (eds.). London: E & FN Spon, 1988. Pp. 134-142.
    • 14. HUGHES, M. G., M. DOHERTY, R. J. TONG, T. REILLY, AND N. T. CABLE. Reliability of repeated sprint exercise in non-motorised treadmill ergometry. Int J Sports Med. 27: 900-904. 2006.
    • 15. MCGAWLEY, K., AND D. BISHOP. Reliability of a 5 x 6-s maximal cycling repeated-sprint test in trained female team-sport athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol. 98: 383-393. 2006.
    • 16. MCGRAW, K. O., AND S. P. WONG. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods. 1: 30-46. 1996.
    • 17. PATON, C. D., W. G. HOPKINS, AND L. VOLLEBREGT. Little effect of caffeine ingestion on repeated sprints in team-sport athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 33: 822-825. 2001.
    • 18. PSOTTA, R., P. BLAHUS, D. J. COCHRANE, AND A. J. MARTIN. The assessment of an intermittent high intensity running test. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 45: 248-256. 2005.
    • 19. ROBINSON, J. M., M. H. STONE, R. L. JOHNSON, C. M. PENLAND, B. J. WARREN, AND R. D. LEWIS. Effects of different weight training exercise/rest intervals on strength, power, and high intensity exercise endurance. J Strength Cond Res. 9: 216-221. 1995.
    • 20. SCHABORT, E.J., J. A. HAWLEY, W. G. HOPKINS, AND H. BLUM. High reliability of performance of well-trained rowers on a rowing ergometer. J Sports Sci. 17: 627-632. 1999.
    • 21. STONE, M. H., K. SANBORN, L. L. SMITH, H. S. O'BRYANT, T. HOKE, A. C. UTTER, R. L. JOHNSON, R. BOROS, J. HRUBY, K. C. PIERCE, M. E. STONE, AND B. GARNER. Effects of in-season (5 weeks) creatine and pyruvate supplementation on anaerobic performance and body composition in American football players. Int J Sports Nutr. 9: 146-165. 1999.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article