LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Fleming, J.; McLaughlin, E. (2012)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: JN101, HV
Until June 2010, public confidence in police was at the heart of the UK's police performance framework. In the preceding years, the public confidence agenda (PCA) was addressed through a diverse array of government-initiated programmes and concepts such as ‘neighbourhood policing’ and ‘reassurance policing’ that sought to enhance feelings of safety and inspire public confidence in police. Scholars, aware of the significance of fairness in police–citizen encounters and the central importance of visibility in building confidence and trust, began to examine the PCA through surveys and other quantifiable assessments of community safety to explore how cooperation and support for police could be encouraged, evaluating ‘satisfactory’ levels amongst citizens and communities and generally interrogating the ‘public confidence’ agenda. While there have been a variety of conceptual framings and methodological approaches to measure and quantify ‘public confidence’, scholars generally have located the concept of ‘public confidence’ as an objective condition; like the notion of ‘publics’, a ‘phenomenon to be achieved, rather than a concept that perhaps needs unwrapping itself’. This paper traces the origins and evolution of the PCA. In this paper we advocate the use of a policy analysis approach to explore how ‘public confidence’ surfaced as a significant policy issue during New Labour's three administrations. The paper seeks to reinsert political analysis into what has become a de-politicised and primarily methodological discussion about the measurement of such a concept. We argue that the PCA is not a collective subject that has sought to express itself universally but was been ‘called’ into existence and moulded by New Labour in order to construct a useful policy domain.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Barber, M. 2007. Instruction to deliver, London: Politicos.
    • Barton, A. 2008. New labour's management, audit and 'What Works' approach to controlling the 'Untrustworthy' professions. Public policy and administration, 23(3): 263-277.
    • Berry, J. 2009. Reducing bureaucracy in policing, interim report, London: Home Office.
    • Bland, N. 1997. Measuring public expectation of policing: an evaluation of gap analysis. Police Research Series 24, London: Home Office Police Research Group.
    • Blumer , H. , 1971 . Social problems as collective behaviour . Social problems , 18 ( 3 ), 298 - 306.
    • Blunkett, D. 2001. Politics and progress: renewing democracy and a civil society, London: Demos.
    • Blunkett , D. , 2003 . Civil renewal: a new agenda . The CSV Edith Kahn Memorial lecture .
    • Available from: http://www.communities.gov.uk/publication Blunkett, D. 2006. The Blunkett Tapes: my life in the bear pit, London: Bloomsbury.
    • Blunkett, D. 2009. A people's police force: police accountability in the modern era, London: Home Office.
    • Boyne, G., Kirkpatrick, I. and Kitchener, M. 2001. New Labour and the modernisation of public management. Public administration, 79(1): 1-4.
    • Bradford, B., Stanko, E. and Jackson, J. 2009. Using research to inform policy: the role of public attitude surveys in understanding public confidence and police contact. Policing: a journal of policy and practice, 3(2): 139-148.
    • Bradley, R. 1998. Public expectations and perceptions of policing. Police Research Series 96, London: Home Office Police Research Group.
    • Brown, R. and Evans, E. 2009. Public confidence in the police: guidance for police authorities and police forces, London, SW1: Association of Police Authorities.
    • Cabinet Office , 1999a . Modernising government . CM4310 . London : HMSO .
    • Cabinet Office , 1999b . Professional policy making for the twenty-first century . London : HMSO.
    • Casey, L. 2008. Engaging communities in fighting crime, London: Cabinet Office.
    • Conservative Party , 2009 . Back on the beat . London : Conservative Party .
    • Home Office , 2008a . From neighbourhood to the national: policing our communities together .
    • London : Home Office , CM7448 .
    • Rawnsley, A. 2001. Servants of the people, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    • Stanko, B. and Bradford, B. 2009. Beyond measuring how good a job the police are doing: the MPS model of confidence in the police. Policing: an international journal of policy and practice, 3(4): 322- 330.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article