Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Steentjes, K.; Kurz, T.; Barreto, M.; Morton, T. A. (2017)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BF, Morality, Interpersonal activism, Social norms, Social change, Persuasion/social influence, Climate change
WOS:000398868900011 (Nº de Acesso Web of Science) A growing body of research points to the role social norms may play in both maintaining carbon intensive lifestyles and soliciting changes towards more sustainable ways of living. However, despite highlighting the importance of pro-environmental social norms, such literature has said far less about the processes by which such norms might develop. We present a new approach to conceptualising social norms that focuses on understanding their dynamics within social interaction, by positioning interpersonal confrontation as a potential mechanism of change. We examine the normative dynamics of environmentalism by comparing the costs of interpersonally confronting climate change disregard with those associated with confronting racism. In two experimental studies, we presented participants with scenarios describing a person confronting (versus not confronting) contentious comments in each domain. We identified social costs to interpersonal confrontation of climate change disregard but not racism, as indicated by reduced ratings of perceived warmth of and closeness to the confronter (Study 1), and this effect was mediated by the perceived morality of the issue in question (Study 2). Our findings highlight how wider social constructions of (im)morality around climate change impact upon social interactions in ways that have important implications for processes of social (and ultimately environmental) change.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1 Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M., Blöbaum, A. (2007) Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: Two field studies. Journal of Environmental Psychology 27, 190- 203.
    • Berger, I.E. (1997) The Demographics of Recycling and the Structure of Environmental Behavior. Environment and Behavior 29, 515-531.
    • Bicchieri, C., Mercier, H., (2014) Norms and beliefs: How change occurs, The complexity of social norms. Springer, pp. 37-54.
    • Blanchard, F.A., Crandall, C.S., Brigham, J.C., Vaughn, L.A. (1994) Condemning and Condoning Racism: A Social Context Approach to Interracial Settings. Journal of Applied Psychology 79, 993-997.
    • Blanchard, F.A., Lilly, T., Vaughn, L.A. (1991) Reducing the expression of racial prejudice.
    • Psychological Science 2, 101.
    • Bratanova, B., Loughnan, S., Gatersleben, B. (2012) The moral circle as a common motivational cause of cross-situational pro-environmentalism. European journal of social psychology 42, 539-545.
    • Capstick, S.B., Demski, C.C., Sposato, R., Pidgeon, N., Spence, A., Corner, A., (2015) Public perceptions of climate change in Britain following the winter 2013/2014 flooding., Understanding Risk Research Group Working Paper 15-01. Cardiff University Cialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R., Kallgren, C.A. (1990) A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58, 1015-1026.
    • Czopp, A.M. (2013) The passive activist: Negative consequences of failing to confront antienvironmental statements. Ecopsychology 5, 17-23.
    • Czopp, A.M., Monteith, M.J. (2003) Confronting Prejudice (Literally): Reactions to Confrontations of Racial and Gender Bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29, 532-544.
    • Czopp, A.M., Monteith, M.J., Mark, A.Y. (2006) Standing up for a change: Reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90, 784- 803.
    • Ellemers, N., Pagliaro, S., Barreto, M., Leach, C.W. (2008) Is it better to be moral than smart? The effects of morality and competence norms on the decision to work at group status improvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95, 1397-1410.
    • Elster, J. (1989) Social norms and economic theory. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 3, 99-117.
    • Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C., Glick, P., Xu, J. (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.
    • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82, 878-902.
    • Gaertner, S.L., Dovidio, J.F. (1986) The aversive form of racism.
    • Gifford, R. (2011) The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American psychologist 66, 290-302.
    • Goldstein, N.J., Cialdini, R.B., Griskevicius, V. (2008) A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of consumer research 35, 472-482.
    • Gordon, M.E., Slade, L.A., Schmitt, N. (1986) The “science of the sophomore” revisited: From conjecture to empiricism. Academy of management review 11, 191-207.
    • Haidt, J. (2007) The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science 316, 998-1002.
    • Hayes, A.F., (2012) PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper].
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article