LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Eckersley, Peter Mark (2016)
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects:
This thesis investigates the governance of climate change policy in English and German cities. Based on fieldwork research in the comparable 'twin towns' of Newcastle and Gelsenkirchen, it focuses on how local authorities in these cities have worked with other actors to increase their capacity to achieve policy objectives. The study analyses these governance arrangements in the context of climate change strategies, planning policy and how the municipalities use resources in their everyday corporate activities. Drawing on theories and typologies of multi-level governance (Hooghe and Marks 2003), policy styles (Richardson 1982), urban governance (Stone 1989) and dependencies in inter-governmental relations (Rhodes 1981), it introduces a new model for mapping power relationships between governing actors. By applying this model to the empirical cases, the thesis identifies how central-local relations in England are looser than those in Germany, and how this results in weaker municipal institutions. This means that Newcastle has had to rely more on local stakeholders to achieve its objectives when compared to Gelsenkirchen. The English council is also less able to exert hierarchical authority over other bodies. Although the study found that the two cities’ approaches are converging in some areas, they are diverging in others. Indeed, they have developed their own distinct coping strategies to achieve policy objectives in the face of similar endogenous and exogenous pressures. These coping strategies are shaped by the institutional framework and power dependent relationships that apply to each city, which challenges the idea that policy problems determine the way in which the political system operates (see Lowi 1964). Such findings have implications for other municipalities in both England and Germany, as well as cities elsewhere in Europe that are seeking to address climate change or other ‘wicked’ public policy issues.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • GOETZ, K., H. 2005. Administrative reform: is public bureaucracy still an obstacle? In: GREEN, S. & PATERSON, W. E. (eds.) Governance in Contemporary Germany: The Semisovereign State Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • GOLDSMITH, M. 2012. Cities in intergovernmental systems. In: MOSSBERGER, K., CLARKE, S. E. & JOHN, P. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Urban Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • GOLDSMITH, M. & PAGE, E. (eds.) 1987. Central and Local Government Relations, London: Sage.
    • GROTE, J., R. 2007. Local Governance und organisierte Zivilgesellschaft. In: SCHWALB, L. & WALK, H. (eds.) Local Governance - mehr Transparenz und Bürgernähe? Wiesbaden: Springer.
    • GRUBB, M. & BRACK, D. 1999. The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and Assessment, London, Brookings Institution.
    • GRUNER, W. 1999. The German council of municipalities (Deutscher Gemeindetag) and the coordination of anti-Jewish local politics in the Nazi state. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 13, 171-199.
    • GRUNOW, D. 2003. Der Ansatz der politikfelbezogenen Verwaltungsanalyse. In: GRUNOW, D. (ed.) Verwaltungshandeln in Politikfeldern. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
    • GUILLÉN, M. F. 2001. Is globalization civilizing, destructive or feeble? A critique of five key debates in the social science literature. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 235-260.
    • GUNLICKS, A. B. 2003. The Länder and German federalism, Manchester, Manchester University Press.
    • HAGUE, R. & HARROP, M. 2013. Comparative Government and Politics, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
    • HAJER, M. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
    • HALL, P. A. & TAYLOR, R. C. A. 1996. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44, 936-957.
    • HAMMOND, A., ADRIAANSE, A., RODENBURG, E., BRYANT, D. & WOODWARD, R. 1995. Environmental indicators: A systematic approach to
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

Cite this article