Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Brock, Andrea (2015)
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Journal: Geoforum
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: JZ, Sociology and Political Science
In Malaysia, second largest palm oil producer worldwide, logging companies, palm oil corporations, and even responsible citizens can now compensate their biodiversity impacts by purchasing Biodiversity Conservation Certificates in an emerging new biodiversity market: the Malua BioBank. Biodiversity markets are part of a wider trend of marketisation and neoliberalisation of biodiversity governance; introduced and promoted as (technical) win–win solutions to counter biodiversity loss and enable sustainable development. The existing neoliberalisation and nature literature has tended to analyse these processes as consequences of an inherent drive of capital to expand accumulation and submit ever more areas of nature to the neoliberal market logic.\ud \ud In contrast, I aim (a) to problematise the agency and the “work” behind marketisation of biodiversity, challenging the story of (corporate-driven) neoliberalisation as the realisation of an inherent market-logic (based on the a false conceptual state–market divide, often prevalent even in activist academic circles working on neoliberalisation of nature) and to see the state not only as regulator, but driving force behind, and part of “the market”; (b) to question the myth of neoliberalisation as state losing control to the market and to show how the state is using the biodiversity market as mode of governing; re-gaining control over its forests and its conservation policy; and (c) to demonstrate empirically the distinction between neoliberal ideology and practice, and to show that marketisation was based on pragmatic decisions, not ideology-driven political action. My analysis is based on 35 qualitative interviews with actors involved in the BioBank.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bakker, K., 2004. An Uncooperative Commodity: Privatizing Water in England and Wales. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    • Bakker, K., 2005. Neoliberalizing nature? Market environmentalism in water supply in England and Wales. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 95, 542-565.
    • Barr, C., Resosudarmo, I.A.P., Dermawan, A., Setiono, B., 2006. Decentralization's effects on forest concessions and timber production. In: Barr, C., Resosudarmo, I. A.P., Dermawan, A., McCarthy, J. (Eds.), Decentralization of Forest Administration in Indonesia: Implications for Forest Sustainability, Economic Development and Community Livelihoods. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia, pp. 87-107.
    • Basiron, Y., 2010. Palmoil: Getting the Facts Right. (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Bayon, R., 2002. Making Money in Environmental Derivatives. New America Foundation, (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Beck, U., 2000. What is Globalization? Polity Press, Oxford, UK and Malden, MA, USA.
    • Brenner, N., Theodore, N., 2002. Cities and the geographies of ''actually existing neoliberalism”. Antipode 34 (3), 349-379.
    • Brockington, D., Duffy, R., 2010. Capitalism and conservation: the production and reproduction of biodiversity conservation. Antipode 42 (3), 469-484.
    • Brockington, D., Duffy, R., Igoe, J., 2008. Nature Unbound: Conservation, Capitalism, and the Future of Protected Areas. Earthscan, London.
    • Burgess, R., Hansen, M., Olken, B., Potapov, P., Sieber, S., 2011. The Political Economy of Deforestation in the Tropics. (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Büscher, B., 2010a. Derivative nature: interrogating the value of conservation in 'Boundless Southern Africa'. Third World Quart. 31 (2), 259-276.
    • Büscher, B., 2010b. Anti-politics as political strategy: neoliberalism and transfrontier conservation in Southern Africa. Develop. Change 41 (1), 29-51.
    • Büscher, B., 2011. The neoliberalisation of nature in Africa. In: Dietz, T., Havnevik, K., Kaag, M., Oestigaard, T. (Eds.), African Engagements: Africa Negotiating an Emerging Multipolar World. Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, NL, pp. 84-109.
    • Büscher, B., Sullivan, S., Neves, K., Igoe, J., Brockington, D., 2012. Towards a synthesized critique of neoliberal biodiversity conservation. Capit. Nat. Social. 23 (2), 4-30.
    • Butler, R.A., 2008. Private Equity Seek Profit from Rainforest Wildlife Conservation. Mongabay, (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Butler, R.A., 2012. Industrial Logging Leaves a Poor Legacy in Borneo's Rainforests. Mongabay, (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Butler, R.A., 2013. Malaysian NGOs Boldly Demand Forest Conservation Action in Borneo. Mongabay, (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Castree, N., 2008. Neoliberalising nature: the logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environ. Plan. A 40 (1), 131-152.
    • Chang, H.J., 2002. Breaking the mould: an institutionalist political economy alternative to the neo-liberal theory of the market and the state. Camb. J. Econ. 26 (05), 539-559.
    • Cox, R.W., 1983. Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: an essay in method. Millen.: J. Int. Stud. 12 (2), 162-175.
    • Cox, R.W., 1986. Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations theory. In: Keohane, R.O. (Ed.), Neorealism and its Critics. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 204-254.
    • Dauvergne, P., 1997. Shadows in the Forest: Japan and the Politics of Timber in Southeast Asia. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
    • Dayang Norwana, A.A.B., Kunjappan, R., Chin, M., Schoneveld, G., Potter, L., Andriani, R., 2011. The Local Impacts of Oil Palm Expansion in Malaysia: An Assessment Based on a Case Study in Sabah State. CIFOR, (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Edwards, L., Cahill, D., Stilwell, F., 2012. Introduction: understanding neoliberalism beyond the free market. In: Cahill, D., Edwards, L., Stilwell, F. (Eds.), Neoliberalism: Beyond the Free Market. Edward Elger, Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, USA.
    • Eftec, IEEP, 2010. The Use of Market-based Instruments for Biodiversity Protection - The Case of Habitat Banking. Technical Report. (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Ferraro, P.J., Simpson, R.D., 2002. The cost-effectiveness of conservation payments. Land Econ. 78 (3), 339-353.
    • FPP (Forest People Program), n.d. Wilmar International. (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Global Witness, 2012. Wills & Kate Need to Examine Real Causes of Forest Destruction in Malaysia. (accessed 14.03. 15).
    • Gripne, S., 2008. Markets for Biodiversity: Delivering Returns from Emerging Environmental Markets. PERC Report 26(4). (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Harvey, D., 2001. Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography. Routledge, New York.
    • Harvey, D., 2004. The 'new' imperialism: accumulation by dispossession. Social. Regist. 40, 63-87.
    • Holmes, G., 2012. Biodiversity for billionaires: capitalism, conservation and the role of philanthropy in saving/selling nature. Develop. Change 43 (1), 185-203.
    • ICE, 2012. The Malaysian Palm Oil Sector - Overview. Trade and Economic Section, European Union Delegation to Malaysia. (accessed 14.03.15).
    • ICMM (International Council on Mining & Metals), 2005. Biodiversity Offsets: A Briefing Paper for the Mining Industry. ICMM, London.
    • Igoe, J., 2010. The spectacle of nature and the global economy of appearances: anthropological engagements with the images of transnational conservation. Crit. Anthropol. 30 (4), 375-397.
    • Knafo, S., 2010. Critical approaches and the legacy of the agent/structure debate in international relations. Camb. Rev. Int. Affairs 23 (3), 493-516.
    • Konings, M., 2010. Neoliberalism and the American State. Crit. Sociol. 36 (5), 741- 765.
    • Koswanage, N., 2013. Insight: In Malaysia's Election, A Focus on Rainforest Graft. REUTERS, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, April 2, 2013. (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Krippner, G.R., 2001. The elusive market: embeddedness and the paradigm of economic sociology. Theory Soc. 30 (6), 775-810.
    • Larner, W., 2003. Neoliberalism? Environ. Plan. D: Soc. Space 21, 509-512.
    • LEAP, n.d. Vision and Strategy. (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Lebel, L., Garden, P., Imamura, M., 2005. The politics of scale, position, and place in the governance of water resources in the Mekong region. Ecol. Soc. 10 (2), 18- 37.
    • Levy, D.L., Egan, D., 2003. A neo-gramscian approach to corporate political strategy: conflict and accommodation in the climate change negotiations. J. Manage. Stud. 40 (4), 803-829.
    • Liverman, D., 2004. Who governs, at what scale and what price? Geography, environmental governance, and the commodification of nature. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 94 (4), 734-738.
    • Madsen, B., Carroll, N., Moore Brands, K., 2010. State of Biodiversity Markets Report: Offset and Compensation Programs Worldwide. Forest Trends, Washington, DC, (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Madsen, B., Carroll, N., Kandy, D., Bennett, G., 2011. Update: State of Biodiversity Markets. Forest Trends, Washington, DC, (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Majid-Cooke, F., 1995. The politics of sustained yield forest management in Malaysia: constructing the boundaries of time, control and consent. Geoforum 26 (4), 445-458.
    • Malua BioBank, 2010. Biodiversity Conservation Certificates. (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Malua BioBank, n.d. How does it Work? (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Mansfield, B., 2004. Rules of privatization: contradictions in neoliberal regulation of North Pacific fisheries. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 94, 565-584.
    • McAfee, K., 1999. Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism. Environ. Plan. D: Soc. Space 17 (2), 133-154.
    • McAfee, K., 2003. Neoliberalism on the molecular scale. Geoforum 34, 203-220.
    • McAfee, K., 2012. The contradictory logic of global ecosystem services markets. Develop. Change 43 (1), 105-131.
    • McElwee, P.D., 2012. Payments for environmental services as neoliberal marketbased forest conservation in Vietnam: Panacea or problem? Geoforum 43 (3), 412-426.
    • Milne, S., Adams, B., 2012. Market masquerades: uncovering the politics of community-level payments for environmental services in Cambodia. Develop. Change 43 (1), 133-158.
    • Mosse, D., 2004. Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice. Develop. Change 35 (4), 639-671.
    • Nagle, J.C., 2009. The effectiveness of biodiversity law. J. Land Use Environ. Law 24, 203-252.
    • NBU (Nyenrode Business Universiteit), n.d. The Eco Products Fund LP. (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Newell, P., Paterson, M., 1998. A climate for business: global warming, the state and capital. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ. 5 (4), 679-703.
    • NewForests, n.d. Investment Strategies: Asia Pacific. (accessed 13.05.13).
    • Pang, T.W., 2011. An important contributor: OBG talks to Pang Teck Wai, CEO, Palm Oil Industrial Cluster (POIC) Sabah. In: The Report: Sabah 2011. Oxford Business Group.
    • Perkins, H.A., 2011. Gramsci in green: neoliberal hegemony through urban forestry and the potential for a political ecology of praxis. Geoforum 42 (5), 558-566.
    • Pokorny, B., Johnson, J., Medina, G., Hoch, L., 2010. Market-based conservation of the Amazonian forests: revisiting win-win expectations. Geoforum 43 (3), 387-401.
    • Polanyi, K., 1957. The Great Transformation. Beacon Press, Boston.
    • POST (Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology), 2011. Biodiversity Offsetting. Postnote 369. (accessed 02.08.15).
    • Prince of Wales, 2011. A Speech by HRH The Prince of Wales to the WWF/Global Forest Trade Network. (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Prudham, S., 2004. Poisoning the well: neoliberalism and the contamination of municipal water in Walkerton, Ontario. Geoforum 35, 343-360.
    • Pye, O., 2010. The biofuel connection - transnational activism and the palm oil boom. J. Peas. Stud. 37 (4), 851-874.
    • Reynolds, G., Payne, J., Sinun, W., Mosigil, G., Walsh, R.P.D., 2011. Changes in forest land use and management in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo, 1990-2010, with a focus on the Danum Valley region. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 3168-3176.
    • Robertson, M.M., 2004. The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum 35 (3), 361-373.
    • Robertson, M., 2009. The work of wetland credit markets: two cases in entrepreneurial wetland banking. Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 17, 35-51.
    • SarawakReport, 2012a. UK Press Reports ''Diplomatic Row” Over William & Kate's Sabah Visit. Kuching, Malaysia. (accessed 14.03.15).
    • SarawakReport, 2012b. Sabah's Smoking Gun! Bank Statements Show that Musa Aman's Sons Accessed Dirty Money. Kuching, Malaysia. (accessed 14.03.15).
    • SarawakReport, 2012c. HSBC's Money-Laundering Scandal - Time to Probe the Musa Connection! Kuching, Malaysia. (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Sewell, W.H., 1982. A theory of structures: duality, agency, and transformation. Am. J. Sociol. 98 (1), 1-29.
    • SFD (Sabah Forestry Department), n.d. Welcome to Ulusegama-Malua Website. (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Silver, J., 2009. TZ1 registry: using world leading infrastructure to integrate traceability and credibility into emerging environmental markets. Presentation at Ecosystem Markets: Making Them Work. Portland, Oregon. (accessed 14.03.13).
    • Smith, N., 2007. Nature as accumulation strategy. Social. Regist. 43, 19-41.
    • Stern, N., 2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.
    • Sullivan, S., 2006. The elephant in the room? Problematizing 'new' (neoliberal) biodiversity conservation. Forum Develop. Stud. 33 (1), 105-135.
    • Sullivan, S., 2012. Financialisation, Biodiversity Conservation and Equity: Some Currents and Concerns. Environment and Development Series 16. Third World Network, Penang, Malaysia.
    • Sullivan, S., 2013a. After the green rush? Biodiversity offsets, uranium power and the 'calculus of casualties' in greening growth. Hum. Geogr. 6 (1), 80-101.
    • Sullivan, S., 2013b. Banking nature? The spectacular financialisation of environmental conservation. Antipode 45 (1), 198-217.
    • Sunjoto, I.P., Radin, A.M., Lagan, P., n.d. Malua Wildlife Habitat Conservation Bank - An Innovative Approach for Conservation in Sabah. (accessed 13.03.15).
    • Tauli-Corpuz, V., Tamang, P., 2007. Oil Palm and Other Commercial Tree Plantations, Monocropping: Impacts on Indigenous Peoples' Land Tenure and Resource Management Systems and Livelihoods. E/C.19/2007/CRP.6. Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, Sixth Session. New York.
    • TEEB, 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB.
    • Ten Kate, K., Bishop, J., Bayon, R., 2004. Biodiversity Offsets: Views, Experience, and the Business Case. IUCN and Insight Investment, Gland, Cambridge, London.
    • Timbervest, n.d. Investing in Environmental Assets and Biodiversity. (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Toh, S.M., Grace, K.T., 2006. Case Study: Sabah Forest Ownership for Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Global Forestry Services Inc., (accessed 13.03.15).
    • Van Hecken, G., Bastiaensen, J., 2010. Payments for ecosystem services: justified or not? A political view. Environ. Sci. Policy 13 (8), 785-792.
    • UNDP-GEF, n.d. UNDP-GEF Biodiversity Projects under Implementation in 2010- 2011. (accessed 14.03.15).
    • Vanar, M., 2012. Suhakam Inquiry Highlights Issues Faced by Sabah's Indigenous People. Suhakam. (accessed 13.03.15).
    • Wakker, E., 2005. Greasy Palms: The Social and Ecological Impacts of Large-scale Oil Palm Plantation Development in Southeast Asia. Friends of the Earth.
    • Walsh, B., 2011. Paying for nature. TIME Magazine. (accessed 13.05.15).
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article