LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Rees, Eliot L.; Davies, Benjamin; Eastwood, Michael (2015)
Publisher: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Journal: Perspectives on Medical Education
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Feedback, Show and Tell, Medical education, Peer teaching, Undergraduate, R1

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION
With the increasing popularity and scale of peer teaching, it is imperative to develop methods that ensure the quality of teaching provided by undergraduate students. We used an established faculty development and quality assurance process in a novel context: peer observation of teaching for undergraduate peer tutors. We have developed a form to record observations and aid the facilitation of feedback. In addition, experienced peer tutors have been trained to observe peer-taught sessions and provide tutors with verbal and written feedback. We have found peer observation of teaching to be a feasible and acceptable process for improving quality of teaching provided by undergraduate medical students. However, feedback regarding the quality of peer observer’s feedback may help to develop students’ abilities further.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Ten Cate O, Durning S. Peer teaching in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Med Teach. 2007;29:591-9.
    • 2. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's doctors. London: GMC; 2009.
    • 3. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and Structure of a Medical School. Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programmes Leading to the MD Degree. Washington, DC: LCME; 2013.
    • 4. Burgess A, McGregor D, Mellis C. Medical students as peer tutors: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:115.
    • 5. Marton GE, McCullough B, Ramnanan CJ. A review of teaching skills development programmes for medical students. Med Educ. 2015;49:149-60.
    • 6. Siddiqui ZS, Jonas-Dwyer D, Carr SE. Twelve tips for peer observation of teaching. Med Teach. 2007;29:297-300.
    • 7. Bennett S, Barp D. Peer observation-a case for doing it online. Teach High Educ. 2008;13:559-70.
    • 8. Gosling D. Models of peer review. http://www.davidgosling. net/userfiles/Gosling%20-%20Models%20of%20Peer%20 Review%20%282009%29.pdf. 2009. Accessed 6 Feb 2015.
    • 9. Sullivan PB, Buckle A, Nicky G, Atkinson SH. Peer observation of teaching as a faculty development tool. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:26.
    • 10. Snydman L, Chandler D, Renic J. Peer observation of resident teaching. Clin Teach. 2013;10:9-14.
    • 11. Pattison AT, Sherwood M, Lumsden CJ, Gale A, Markides M. Foundation observation of teaching project- a developmental model of peer observation of teaching. Med Teach. 2012;34:e136-42.
    • 12. Adshead L, White PT, Stephenson A. Introducing peer observation of teaching to GP teachers: a questionnaire study. Med Teach. 2006;28:e68-73.
    • 13. Regan-Smith M, Hirschmann K, Lobst W. Direct observation of faculty with feedback: an effective means of improving patient centred and learner-centred teaching skills. Teach Learn Med. 2007;19:278-86.
    • 14. Finn K, Chiappa V, Puig A, Hunt DH. How to become a better clinical teacher: a collaborative peer observation process. Med Teach. 2011;33:151-5.
    • 15. Pendleton D, Schofield T, Tate P, Havelock P. The consultation. An approach to learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1984.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
    43
    43%
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article