LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Watson, Tom (2012)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
The measurement and evaluation of public relations effectiveness has long been a major professional and research issue. In the first half of the 20th century, there were two research methods applied, opinion polls and basic media analysis. These were used to plan campaigns and monitor progress of media relations activities. In the second half of the century, as the practices of public relations expanded, greater emphasis was given to media analysis but the evidence of many practitioner studies was that measurement and evaluation was more discussed than undertaken. In the final 25 years of the century, the academic voice began to become more prominent in the discussion and development of methodologies and in nationally-based education programmes aimed at practitioners. The Internet and social media also began to change practices. There were mixed results from this clamour: more practitioners began to evaluate public relations activity (but many still applied discredited measures) whilst new techniques began to be introduced. Document analysis has prepared a timeline of the development of public relations measurement and evaluation. This paper explores the academic and professional themes that have characterised the development of this important public relations practice over the past 110 years.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • White, J. (1990). Evaluation in public relations practice. Cranfield Institute of Management/PRCA (Unpublished).
    • Wilcox, D. L., Cameron, G. T., Ault, P. H., & Agee, W. K. (2005). Public relations strategies and tactics (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon Pearson Education.
    • Wilder, R. H., & Buell, K. L. (1923). Publicity: A manual for the use of business, civic or social service organisations. New York: Ronald Press.
    • Wright, D. G., Gaunt, R., Leggetter, B., & Zerfass, A. (2009). Global survey of communications measurement 2009. London: Benchpoint.
    • Zerfass, A. (2005). The corporate communications scorecard - A framework for managing and evaluating communication strategies. In 12th International Public Relations Research Symposium (Bledcom) 1-3 July 2005, Lake Bled, Slovenia.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article