Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Heather, Nick; Copello, Alex; Godfrey, Christine; Hodgson, Ray; Orford, Jim; Raistrick, Duncan; Russell, Ian; Tober, Gillian; UKATT Research Team (2008)
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: C800, B900
Aim \ud To test a priori hypotheses concerning client–treatment matching in the treatment of alcohol problems and to evaluate the more general hypothesis that client–treatment matching adds to the overall effectiveness of treatment. \ud \ud Design \ud Pragmatic, multi-centre, randomized controlled trial (the UK Alcohol Treatment Trial: UKATT) with open follow-up at 3 months after entry and blind follow-up at 12 months. Setting Five treatment centres, comprising seven treatment sites, including National Health Service (NHS), social services and joint NHS/non-statutory facilities. \ud \ud Treatments \ud Motivational enhancement therapy and social behaviour and network therapy. \ud \ud Measurements \ud Matching hypotheses were tested by examining interactions between client attributes and treatment types at both 3 and 12 months follow-up using the outcome variables of percentage days abstinent, drinks per drinking day and scores on the Alcohol Problems Questionnaire and Leeds Dependence Questionnaire. \ud \ud Findings \ud None of five matching hypotheses was confirmed at either follow-up point on any outcome variable. \ud \ud Conclusion \ud The findings strongly support the conclusion reached in Project MATCH in the United States that client–treatment matching, at least of the kind examined, is unlikely to result in substantial improvements to the effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems. Possible reasons for this failure to support the general matching hypothesis are discussed, as are the implications of UKATT findings for the provision of treatment for alcohol problems in the United Kingdom.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 9. Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C. & Norcross, J. C. (1992) In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviour. American Psychologist, 47, 1102-1114.
    • 10. McLellan, A., Luborski, L., Woody, G., O'Brien, C. & Druley, K. (1983) Predicting response to alcohol and drug abuse treatments: role of psychiatric severity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 620-625.
    • 11. Cooney, N., Kadden, R., Litt, M. & Getter, H. (1991) Matching alcoholics to coping skills or interactional therapies: two year follow-up results. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 59, 598-601.
    • 12. Miller, W.R., Zweben, A., DiClemente, C. and Rychtarik, R. (1992) Motivational Enhancement Therapy: A Clinical Research Guide for Therapists Treating Individuals with Alcohol Abuse and Dependence. Project MATCH Monograph Series, vol. 2, DHHS Pub. No. (ADM) 92-1894. Washington DC: Department of Health and Human Services.
    • 13. Schwartz, D. & Lellouch, J. (1967) Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in clinical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20, 637-648.
    • 14. Flay, B.R. (1986) Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Preventive Medicine, 15, 451- 474.
    • 15. Clifford, P.R. & Longabaugh, R. (1991) Manual for the administration of the Important People and Activities Instrument. Providence RI: Center for Alcohol & Addiction Studies, Brown University.
    • 16. Moos, R. and Moos, B. (1994) Family Environment Scale Manual: Developments, Applications, Research (3rd edition). Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo Alto CA.
    • 17. Heather, N., Luce, A., Peck, D. Dunbar, B. & James, I. (1999) Development of a treatment version of the Readiness to Change Questionnaire. Addiction Research, 7, 63-68.
    • 18. McMahon, J. & Jones, B. (1993) The Negative Alcohol Expectancy Questionnaire. Journal of the Association of Nurses in Substance Abuse, 1, 12 -17.
    • 19. Jones, B.T. & McMahon, J. (1998) Alcohol motivations as outcome expectancies. In: Miller, W.R. & Heather, N. eds. Treating Addictive Behaviors, 2nd edn., pp. 75-92. New York: Plenum.
    • 20. Goldberg, D.P. (1972) The Detection of Psychia tric Illness by Questionnaire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • 21. McLellan, A.T., Luborski, L., Woody, G.E. & O'Brien, C.P. (1980) An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse clients: the Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Nervous & Mental Diseases, 168, 26-33.
    • 22. Spielberger, C.D. (1988) Manual for the State-Trait Anger Expression Scale (STAX). Odessa FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc..
    • 23. Raistrick, D., Bradshaw, J., Tober, G., Weiner, J., Allison, J. & Healey, C. (1994) Development of the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ): a questionnaire to measure alcohol and opiate dependence in the context of a treatment evaluation package. Addiction, 89, 563-572.
    • 24. Miller, W.R. (1996) Form 90: A Structured Assessment Interview for Drinking and Related Behaviors. (Project MATCH Monograph Series, Vol. 5.) Rockville MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism.
    • 25. Drummond, D.C. (1990) The relationship between alcohol dependence and alcohol related problems in a clinical population. British Journal of Addiction, 85, 357-366.
    • 26. Miller, W. R., Walters, S. T. & Bennett, M. E. (2001) How effective is alcoholism treatment in the United States? Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 211-220.
    • 27. Finney, J.W. & Moos, R.H. (1986) Matching patients with treatments: conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 47, 122-134.
    • 28. McClelland, G. H. & Judd, C. M. (1993) Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects, Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376-390.
    • 29. Moyer, A., Finney, J. W., Elworth, J. T. & Kraemer, H. C. (2001) Can methodological features account for patient-treatment matching findings in the alcohol field? Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 62-73.
    • 30. Stout, R., Del Boca, F.K, Carbonari, J., Rychtarik, R., Litt, M.D. & Cooney, N. (2003) Primary treatment outcomes and matching effects: outpatient arm. In: Babor, T. & del Boca, F. K. eds. Treatment Matching in Alcoholism, IRMA Monograph Series No. 4, pp. 105-1 34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • 31. Randall, C., del Boca, F.K., Mattson, M.E., Rychtarik, R., Cooney, N.L., Donovan, D.M., Longabaugh, R. & Wirtz, P.W. (2003) Primary treatment outcomes and matching effects: aftercare arm. In: Babor, T.F. & del Boca, F.K. eds. Treatment Matching in Alcoholism. IRMA Monograph Series No. 4, pp. 135- 149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • 32. Finney, J. W. and Moos Rudolf, H. (1986) Matching patients with treatments: conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 47, 122-134.
    • 33. Institute of Medicine (1990) Broadening the base of treatment for Alcohol Problems. Washington DC: National Academy Press .
    • 34. Mattson, M. & Allen, J. (1991) Research on matching alcoholic patients to treatments: findings, issues and implications. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 11, 33-49.
    • 35. Lindstrom, L. (1992) Managing Alcoholism: Matching Clients to Treatment. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • 36. Brown, M.J. (2001) Matching the right drug to the right patient in essential hypertension. Heart, 86, 113-120.
    • 37. Heather, N. (1999) Some common methodological criticisms of Project MATCH: are they justified? Addiction, 94, 36-39.
    • 38. Humphreys, K., Weingardt, K., Horst, D., Joshi , A. & Finney, J. (2005) Prevalence and predictors of research participant eligibility criteria in alcohol treatment outcome studies. Addiction, 100, 1249-1257.
    • 39. Sobell, L. C. & Sobell M. B. (1981) Frequent follow-up as data gathering and continued care with alcoholics. International Journal of the Addictions, 16, 1077- 1086.
    • 40. Ogborne, A.C. & Annis, H.M. (1998) The reactive effect of follow-up assessment procedures: an experimental study. Addictive Behaviors, 13, 123-129.
    • 41. Clifford, P. R. & Maisto, S. A. (2000) Subject reactivity effects and alcohol treatment outcome research. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61 , 787-793.
    • 42. Clifford, P. R., Maisto, S. A., Franzke, L. H., Longabaugh, R. & Beattie, M. C. (2000) Alcohol treatment research follow-up interviews and drinking behaviours, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 736-743.
    • 43. Bühringer, G. (2006) Allocating treatment options to patient profiles: clinical art of science? Addiction, 101, 646-652.
    • 44. McLachlan, J. (1972) Benefit from group therapy as a function of patient-therapist match on conceptual level. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 9, 317- 323.
    • 45. Karno, M. & Longabaugh, R. (2007) Do es matching matter? Examining matches and mismatches between patient attributes and therapy techniques in alcoholism treatment. Addiction, 102, 587-596.
    • 46. Hall, W. & Einfeld, S. (1990) On doing the 'impossible': inferring that a putative causal relationship does not exist. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 24, 217-226.
    • 47. Stiles, W. B., Shapiro, D. A. & Elliott, R. (1986) Are all psychotherapies equivalent? American Psychologist, 41, 165-180.
    • 48. Beutler, L. E. (1991) Have all won and must all have prizes? Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 59, 226-232.
    • 49. Wampold, B. E., Mondin, G. W., Moody, M., Stich, F., Benson, K. & Ahn, H. (1997) A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: empirically "all must have prizes". Psychological Bulletin, 122, 203-215.
    • 50. Truax, C. & Carkhuff , R. (1973) Toward Effective Counselling and Psychotherapy. Chicago: Aldine.
    • 51. Franks, J. (1976) Persuasion and Healing: A Comparative Study of Psychotherapy. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Pres s.
    • 52. Cooney, N., Babor, T., DiClemente, C. & del Boca, F. (2003) Clinical and scientific implications of Project MATCH. In: Babor, T. & del Boca, F. (Eds.) Treatment Matching in Alcoholism, IRMA Monograph Series No. 4, pp. 222-237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • 53. Orford, J, Hodgson, R., Copello, A., John, B., Smith, M., Black, R., et al. on behalf of the UKATT Research Team (2006) The client's perspective on change during treatment for an alcohol problem: qualitative analysis of follow-up interviews in the UK Alcohol Treatment Trial. Addiction, 101, 60-68.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article