Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Kamaroddin, M.F.; Hanotu, J.; Gilmour, D.J.; Zimmerman, W.B. (2016)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
The scaling up and downstream processing costs of biofuels from microalgae are major concerns. This study focuses on reducing the cost by using energy efficient methods in the production of microalgae biomass and the downstream processes (biomass harvesting and lipid extraction). Ozonation of Dunaliella salina (green alga) and Halomonas (Gram-negative bacterium) mixed cultures for 10 min at 8 mg/L resulted in a reduction in the bacterial contaminant without harming the microalga. Harvesting of D. salina cells through microflotation resulted in a 93.4% recovery efficiency. Ozonation of the harvested microalgal cells for 60 min produced three main saturated hydrocarbon compounds (2-pentadecanone, 6, 10, 14-trimethyl; hexadecanoic acid; octadecanoic acid) consisting of 16 to 18 carbons. By systematically switching the carrier gas from CO2 to O3, the microbubble-driven airlift loop bioreactor (ALB) delivers nutrient to the culture and in-situ disinfection respectively. Further, modulating the bubble size to match particle size ensures recovery of the cells after culture. All three key operations (disinfection, harvesting and lipid extraction) are assembled in a scalable, relatively energy efficient process.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 [2] [3] [4] vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1037 1047, 2010. L. Brennan and P. -A review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co- Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 557 577, 2010. J. Kim, G. Yoo, H. Lee, J. Lim, K. Kim, C. W. Kim, M. S. Park, and J. W. Yang, [6] [10] J. Hanotu, K. Yi
    • 46, no. 17, pp. 5509 16, Nov. 2012. [25] T. Nakashima, Y. Miyazaki, Y. Matsuyama, W. Muraoka, K. Yamaguchi, and T. Oda,
    • Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., vol. 73, no.
    • Technol., vol. 18, no. SUPPL. 1, pp. 29 35, 2007. [31] B. Thanomsub, V. Anupunpisit, S. Chanphetch, T. Watcharachaipong, R. Poonkhum, J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 193 9, Aug. 2002.
    • Radiat. Phys. Chem., vol. 63, no. 3 6, pp. 665 667, Mar. 2002. [34] V. K. Sharma, T. M. Triantis, M. G. Antoniou, X. He, M. Pelaez, C. Han, W. Song, K.
    • Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 91, pp. 3 17, May 2012. [35] F. Hammes, S. Meylan, E. Salhi, O. Köst
    • Water Res., vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1447 54, Apr.
    • Biomater. Nanobiotechnol., vol. 04, no. 02, pp. 1 9, 2013. [38] J. Ralston and S. . Dukhin,
    • Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., vol. 151, no. 1 2, pp. 3 14, Jun. 1999.
    • J. Biotechnol., vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 21 27, 2012. [40] M. Yamamoto, S. Baldermann, K. Yoshikawa, A. Fujita, N. Mase, and N. Watanabe,
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article