LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Beach, Y.; Coule, T. (2016)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Other
Subjects:
In considering the contextual aspects of organizational change projects, it is notable that consideration of the sociopolitical\ud dynamics within the pre-initiation phase is largely neglected in current theorization. In practice, a project\ud manager is often allocated to projects post-scoping where the focus is on governance and execution; often with little\ud understanding of the real problem statement and the socio-political dynamics of the project context. This paper\ud provides a critical review of the current state of research relating to organizational change projects and argues that\ud increased attention to understanding the wider socio-political context within the front-end of projects would likely\ud influence the fundamental boundaries of the project management discipline and the role of project management\ud practitioners. In doing so, the paper outlines a research agenda to inform future empirical work on the pre-initiation\ud phase of organizational change projects.\ud
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] J. R. Turner, The handbook of project-based management: Improving the processes for achieving strategic objectives, 2nd ed., London: McGraw-Hill, 1999.
    • [2] A. Stryhre , “Project management in the culture,” International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 22-35, 2011.
    • [3] N. G. Hall, “Project Management: Recent Developments and Research Opportunities,” System Science and Systems Engineering, vol. 2, no. 21, pp. 12-143, 2012.
    • [4] S. B. Johnson, “Three approaches to big technology: Operations research, systems enginnering and project management,” Technology and Culture, vol. 38, pp. 891-919, 1997.
    • [5] R. Levene, The Origins of Project Management . International Encyclopedia of Business and Managment, London: Thomson Business Press, 1996.
    • [6] K. Eisenhardt and B. Tabrizi, “Accelerating adaptive processes: product innovation in the global computer industry,” Administrative Science Quarterly, no. 40, pp. 84-110, 1995.
    • [7] R. Whittington and at el, “Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: a European panel study, 1992-1996,” Organization Science, no. 10, pp. 583-600, 1996.
    • [8] P. W. Morris, The Management of Projects, London: Thomas Telfor, 1994.
    • [9] R. Miller and D. Lessard, The strategic management of large engineering projects: Shaping institutions, risks and governance, MIT Press ed., Cambridge: MA, 2001.
    • [10] B. Flyvbjerg, N. Bruzelius and W. Rothengatter, Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Pess, 2003.
    • [11] APM, APM Body of Knowledge, High Wycombe: Association of Project Managment, 2006.
    • [12] Project Management Institute, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, PMI, 2009.
    • [13] J. Soderlund, “Pluralism in Project Management: Navigating the Crossroads of Specialization and Fragmentation,” International Journal of Management reviews, no. 13, pp. 153-176, 2011.
    • [14] C. N. Bredillet, “Blowing Hot and Cold on Project Management,” Project Management Journal, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 4-20, 2010.
    • [15] T. Kuhn, The structure of scientific revolutions., Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
    • [16] T. Williams, “Assessing and moving from the dominant project managment discourse in the light of project overruns,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 497-508, 2005.
    • [17] S. Cicmil and D. Hodgson, “New possibilities for project management theory: a critical engagement,” Project Management Journal, vol. 3, no. 37, pp. 111-122, 2006.
    • [18] C. N. Bredillet, “Beyond the positivist mirror: Towards a project management 'gnosis',” Turku, Finland, 2004.
    • [19] L. Crawford, J. Pollack and D. England, “Uncovering the trends in project management: Journal emphases over the last ten years,” International Journal of Project Management, no. 24, pp. 175-184, 2006.
    • [20] J. Pollack, “The changing paradigms of project management.,” International Journal of Project Management, no. 25, pp. 266-274, 2007.
    • [21] B. J. Kolltveit , J. T. Karlsen and K. Gronhaug, “Perspectives on project management,” International Journal of Project Management, no. 25, pp. 3-9, 2007.
    • [22] C. S. Curran and B. Nidergassel, “Project leadership skills in coorperative projects,” Management Research News, vol. 5, no. 32, pp. 458- 468, 2009.
    • [23] M. Winter and T. Szczepanek, “Projects and programmes as value creation processes: A new perspective and some practical implications,” International Journal of Project Management, no. 26, pp. 95-103, 2008.
    • [24] E. P. Antonacopoulou and R. Michaelides, “Project Management as a Dynamic Collaborative Social Practice: collaborative Inovation Revisited,” Portland, 2014.
    • [25] S. Leybourne and P. Sainter, “Advancing project management: Authenticating the shift from process to 'nuanced' project-based management in the ambidextrous organization,” Project Management Journal, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 5-15, 2012.
    • [26] F. Ahlemann, F. E. Arbi, M. G. Kaiser and A. Heck, “A process framework for theoretically grounded perscriptive research in the project management field,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 31, pp. 43-56, 2013.
    • [27] T. Biedenbach and R. Muller, “Paradigms in project management rserach: examples from 15 of IRNOP confrences,” International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 82-104, 2011.
    • [28] A. Laufer, G. R. Denkar and A. J. Shenhar, “Simultaneous management: the key to excellence in capital projects,” international Jurnal of Project Management, vol. 14, pp. 189-199, 1996.
    • [29] M. Winter, C. Smith, P. Morris and S. Cimcil, “Directions for future research in project management: the main findings of a UK government-funded research network,” International Journal of Project Management, no. 24, pp. 638-649, 2006.
    • [30] A. J. Sense, “Profiling the context and opportunities for Austrialian project manegement research,” International Journal of Managing Projects, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 105-117, 2011.
    • [31] R. Stacey, Complex responsive process in organizations: Learning and knowledge creation, London: Routledge, 2001.
    • [32] M. Wood, “Mind the Gap? A processual reconsideration of organizational knowledge,” Organization, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 151-71, 2002.
    • [33] S. A. Leybourne, “The changing bias of project management research: A consideration of the literatures and an application of extant theory,” Project Management Journal, vol. 1, no. 38, pp. 62-73, 2007.
    • [34] P. Morris, Reconstructing Project Management, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2013.
    • [35] T. Williams and K. Samset, “Issues in front-end decision making on projects,” Project Management Journal, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 38-49, 2010.
    • [36] D. Granot and D. Zuckerman, “Optimal sequencing and resource allocation in reseach and development projects,” Management Science , no. 37, pp. 140-156, 1991.
    • [37] R. Atkinson, “Project management:Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phonemenon, it's time to accept other success criteria,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 337-342, 1999.
    • [38] R. Rycroft and J. S. Szyliowicz, “Decision making in a technological environment: The case of the Aswan High Dam,” University of Denver, Denver, 1980.
    • [39] P. Morris and G. Hough, The anatomy of major projets, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987.
    • [40] National Audit Office, “Major IT procurement: The impact of the Office of Government Commerce's initiatives on departments and suppliers in the delivery of major IT enabled projects,” London, 2004.
    • [41] J. K. Pinto and D. P. Slevin, “Critical factors in successful project implementation,” IEEE Transactons on Engineering Management, vol. 34 , no. 1, pp. 22-27, 1987.
    • [42] B. Whittaker, “What went wrong? Unsuccessful information technology projects,” Information Management & Computer Science, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 23-29, 1999.
    • [43] M. R. Lind, “Information technology project performance: The impact of critical success factors,” International Journal of Information Technology Project Management, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 14-25, 2011.
    • [44] World Bank, “Evaluation results 1994,” International Bank of Reconstruction and Development, Washington, DC, 1996.
    • [45] B. Flyvbjerg, “Optimism and misrepresentation in early project development,” in Making essential choices with scant information, T. Williams, K. Samset and K. Sunnevag, Eds., Bassingstoke, UK, Palgrave MacMillan, 2009, pp. 147-168.
    • [46] T. Williams, K. Samset and K. Sunnevag, “Implementing strategy through project management: The importance of managing the project front-end,” in Making essential choices with scant information, Basinstoke, Palgrave MacMillian, 2009, pp. 39-67.
    • [47] S. Wearne, “Evidence - based scope for reducing 'fire-fighting- in project management,” Project Management Journal, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 67-75, 2014.
    • [48] P. Naess, Up-front assessment of needs. Making essential choices with scant information, Bassingstoke: Palgave MacMillian, 2009.
    • [49] C. Hjortso and H. Meilby, “Balancing research and organisational capacity building in front-end projects design: experiences from Danida's Enreca Programme,” Pulblic Administration and Development, no. 33, pp. 205-220, 2013.
    • [50] D. Balio and A. D. Price, “Modeling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance,” International Journal Project Management, vol. 4, no. 21, pp. 261-269, 2003.
    • [51] M. Henrie and A. Sousa-Poza, “Project Management: A cultral literary review,” Project Management Journal, vol. 1, no. 36, pp. 5-14, 2005.
    • [52] S. L. Brown and K. M. Eisenhardt, “The art of continous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 1, no. 42, pp. 1-34, 1997.
    • [53] S. Austin, A. Newton , J. Steele and P. Waskett, “Modelling and managing project complexity,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 191-8, 2002.
    • [54] J. Thomas and T. Mengal, “Preparing project managers to deal with complexity - advanced project management education,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 3, no. 26, pp. 304-315, 2008.
    • [55] M. Hagen and S. Park, “Ambiguity Acceptance as a Function of Project Management: A New Critical Success Factor,” Project Management Journal, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 52-66, 2013.
    • [56] M. T. Pich, C. H. Loch and A. D. Meyer, “On uncertainity, ambiguity and complexity in project management,” Management Science, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1008-1023, 2002.
    • [57] T. Grundy, “How are corporate strategy and human resource strategy linked?,” Journal of General Management, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 49-72, 1998.
    • [58] S. Pellegrinelli and C. Bowman, “Implementing strategy through projects,” Long Range Planning, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 125-132, 1994.
    • [59] H. Maylor, “Beyond the Gantt chart: project management moving on,” European Managment Journal, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 92-100, 2001.
    • [60] S. Clegg and D. Coupasson, “Political hybrids: tocquevillean views on project organizations,” Management Studies, no. 41, pp. 525-547, 2004.
    • [61] S. Cicmil, T. Cooke-Davies, L. Crawford and K. Richardson, Exploring the Complexity of Projects: Implications of Complexity Theory for Project Managment Practice, Newton Square: PMI, 2009.
    • [62] T. Cooke-Davies, S. Cicmil, L. Crawford and K. Richardson, “We're not in Kansas anymore, Toto: mapping the strange landscape f complexity theory, and its realtionshipto project management,” Proct Management Journal, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 50-61, 2007.
    • [63] J. Geraldi and G. Adlbrecht, “On faith, fact and interaction in projects,” Project Management Journal, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 32-43, 2007.
    • [64] H. Maylor, R. Vidgen and S. Carver, “Managerial complexity in project-based operations: a ground model and its implications for practice,” Project Managment Jurnal , vol. 39, pp. 15-26, 2008.
    • [65] K. Remmington and J. Pollack, Tools for Complex Projects, Burlington: Gower, 2007.
    • [66] S. Leybourne, “Managing change by abandoning planning and embracing improvisation,” Journal of General Management, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 11-29, 2006.
    • [67] J. Geraldi, “What complexity assesments can tell us about projects: dialogue between conception and perception,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 665-678, 2009.
    • [68] T. Watson, Organising and managing work, Harlow, UK: Prentice Hall, 2006.
    • [69] J. Geraldi, “Now, let's make it really complex (complicated).,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 966-990, 2011.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article