Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Jenkins, L.; Cosgrove, J.; Ekberg, K.; Kheder, A.; Sokhi, D.; Reuber, M. (2015)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Question design during history-taking has clear implications for patients' ability to share their concerns in general and their seizure experiences in particular. Studies have shown that unusually open questions at the start of the consultation enable patients to display interactional and linguistic markers which may help with the otherwise challenging differentiation of epileptic from nonepileptic seizures (NES). In this study, we compared the problem presentation approach taken by trainee neurologists in outpatient encounters with new patients before and after a one-day conversation analytic training intervention in which doctors were taught to adopt an open format of question design and recognize diagnostically relevant linguistic features. We audio/video-recorded clinical encounters between ten doctors, their patients, and accompanying persons; transcribed the interactions; and carried out quantitative and qualitative analyses. We studied 39 encounters before and 55 after the intervention. Following the intervention, doctors were significantly more likely to use nondirective approaches to soliciting patient accounts of their presenting complaints that invited the patient to describe their problems from their own point of view and gave them better opportunity to determine the initial agenda of the encounter. The time to first interruption by the doctor increased (from 52 to 116 s, p<.001). While patients were given more time to describe their seizure experiences, the overall appointment length did not increase significantly (19 vs 21 min, n.s.). These changes gave patients more conversational space to express their concerns and, potentially, to demonstrate the interactional and linguistic features previously found to help differentiate between epilepsy and NES, without impacting the length of the consultations.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Beckman, H. B., & Frankel, R. M. (1984). The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data.
    • Annals of Internal Medicine, 101, 692 6W96.
    • Boyd, E., & Heritage, J. (2006). Taking the history: Questioning during comprehensive history taking.
    • In J. Heritage & D. Maynard (Eds.), Communication in medical care: Interaction between physicians and patients. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. p. 151 1W84 Cornaggia, C. M., Gugliotta, S. C., Magaudda, A., Alfa, R., Beghi, M. & Polita, M. (2012) Conversation analysis in the differential diagnosis of Italian patients with epileptic or psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: A blind prospective study. Epilepsy Behavior, 25 (4), 598-604 Heritage, J., & Maynard, D.W. (2006) Introduction. In Heritage, J., and Maynard, D.W. (Eds) Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients.
    • Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, p. 1-21 Heritage, J., & Robinson, J. D. (2006). The structure of patients P opening questions. Health Communication, 19(2), 89 1W02.
    • unmet concerns in primary care: The difference one word can make. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(10), 1429 1W433.
    • Jenkins, L., & Reuber, M. (2014) A Conversation Analytic Intervention to Help Neurologists Identify Diagnostically Relevant Linguistic Features in Seiz Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47:3, 266-279
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.
  • BioEntity Site Name
    1w02Protein Data Bank

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article