LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Iyer, A.; Hornsey, M.J.; Vanman, E.J.; Esposo, S.; Ale, S. (2014)
Publisher: Wiley
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
In an era of digital technology and the Internet, terrorists can communicate their threats directly to citizens of Western countries. Yet no research has examined whether these messages change individuals’ attitudes and behaviour, or the psychological processes underlying these effects. Two studies (conducted in 2008 and 2010) examined how American, Australian, and British participants responded to messages from Osama bin Laden that threatened violence if troops were not withdrawn from Afghanistan. Heightened fear in response to the message resulted in what we call “aggressive capitulation,” characterized by two different group-protection responses: (1) submission to terrorist demands in the face of threats made against one’s country, and (2) support for increased efforts to combat the source of the threat, but expressed in abstract terms that do not leave one’s country vulnerable. Fear predicted influence over and above other variables relevant to persuasion. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • De la Baume, M. (2010, October 27). New bin Laden tape threatens France. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/28/world/europe/28osama.html?_r= 1&scp=2&sq=Osama%20bin%20Laden&st=cse.
    • Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410- 436.
    • Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C., Glick, P.S., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
    • Frijda, N.H., T. Kuipers, & E. ter Shure. 1989. Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57: 212-243.
    • Gallup Poll (2013, 9 May). Terrorism in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/4909/Terrorism-United-States.aspx
    • Gerend, M.A., & Maner, J.K. (2011). Fear, anger, fruits, and veggies: Interactive effects of emotion and message framing on health behavior. Health Psychology, 30, 420-423.
    • Giner-Sorolla, R., & S. Chaiken. (1997). Selective use of heuristic and systematic processing under defense motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23: 84-97.
    • Giner-Sorolla, R., & Maitner, A. T. (2013). Angry at the unjust, scared of the powerful: Emotional responses to terrorist threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1069-1082.
    • Halperin, E., A.G. Russell, C.S. Dweck, and J.J. Gross. 2011. Anger, hatred, and the quest for peace: Anger can be constructive in the absence of peace. Journal of Conflict Resolution 55: 274-291.
    • Hovland, C.I., Janis, I.L., & Kelly, H.H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven: Yale University Press. Sage.
    • Klandermans, B., & Oegema, D. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers: Steps towards participations in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52, 519 531.
    • Krosnick, J. A., Visser, P. S., & Harder, J. (2010). The psychological underpinnings of political behaviour. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2 (5th ed.) (pp. 1288-1342). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    • Lazarus, R.S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Lerner, J.S., Gonzalez, R.M., Small, D.A., & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14, 144-150.
    • Mackie, D.M., Devos, T., & Smith, E.R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602-616.
    • Miller, D.A., Cronin, T., Garcia, A.L., & N.R. Branscombe, N.R., (2009). The relative impact of anger and efficacy on collective action is affected by feelings of fear. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 445-462.
    • Mintz, A., & Brule, D. (2009). Methodological issues in studying suicide terrorism. Political Psychology, 30, 365-371.
    • Petty, R.E., Briñol, P., & Tomala, Z.L. (2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 722-741.
    • Reid, E.F., & Chen, H. (2007). Mapping the contemporary terrorism research domain. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 656, 42-56.
    • Sadler, M.S., Lineberger, M., Correll, J., & Park, B. (2006). Emotions, attributions, and policy endorsement in response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 249-258.
    • Sandler, T. (2010). Terrorism and policy: An introduction. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54, 203-213.
    • Schmid, A. (2005). Terrorism as psychological warfare. Democracy and Security, 1, 137-146.
    • Shoshani, A., & Slone, M. (2008). The drama of media coverage of terrorism: Emotional and attitudinal impact on the audience. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 31, 627-640.
    • Skitka, L.J., Bauman, C.W., Aramovich, N. P., & Morgan, G.S. (2006). Confrontational and to go away. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 375-384.
    • Spanovic, M., Lickel, B., Denson, T.F., & Petrovic, B. (2010). Fear and anger as predictors of motivation for intergroup aggression: Evidence from Serbia and Republika Srpska. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 725-739.
    • Stenstrom, D.M., Lickel, B., Denson, T.F., & Miller, N. (2008). The roles of ingroup identification and outgroup entitativity in intergroup retribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1570-1582.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

Cite this article