Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Samuels, CA; Butterworth, G; Roberts, T; Graupner, Ludmila; Hole, Graham (1994)
Languages: English
Types: Article

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: genetic structures
The visual preferences of human infants for faces that varied in their attractiveness and in their symmetry about the midline were explored. The aim was to establish whether infants' visual preference for attractive faces may be mediated by the vertical symmetry of the face. Chimeric faces, made from photographs of attractive and unattractive female faces, were produced by computer graphics. Babies looked longer at normal and at chimeric attractive faces than at normal and at chimeric unattractive faces. There were no developmental differences between the younger and older infants: all preferred to look at the attractive faces. Infants as young as 4 months showed similarity with adults in the 'aesthetic perception' of attractiveness and this preference was not based on the vertical symmetry of the face.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alley T R, 1988 Social and Applied Aspects of Perceiving Faces (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates)
    • Baldwin J M, 1905 Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology. Beauty Volume 1 (London: Macmillan) pp 104-109
    • Bornstein M H, Ferdinandsen K, Gross C G, 1981 "Perception of symmetry in infancy" Developmental Psychology 17 8 2 - 8 6
    • Carello C, Grosofsky A, Shaw R E, Pittenger J B, Mark I S, 1989 "Attractiveness of facial profiles is a function of distance from archetype" Ecological Psychology 1 227 - 251
    • Fisher C B, Ferdinandsen K, Bornstein M H, 1981 "The role of symmetry in infant form discrimination" Child Development 52 4 5 7 - 4 6 2
    • Hildebrandt K A, Fitzgerald H E, 1979 "Facial feature determinants of perceived infant attractiveness" Infant Behavior and Development 2 3 2 9 - 3 3 9
    • Langlois J H, 1986 "From the eye of the beholder to behavioral reality: The development of social behaviors and social relations as a function of physical attractiveness", in Physical Appearance, Stigma, and Social Behavior: The Ontario Symposium Volume 3, Eds C P Herman, M P Zanna, E T Higgins (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum) pp 23 - 51
    • Langlois J H, Ritter J M, Roggman L A, Vaughn L S, 1991 "Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces" Developmental Psychology 27 79 - 84
    • Langlois J H, Roggman L A , 1990 "Attractive faces are only average" Psychological Science 1 1 1 5 - 1 2 1
    • Langlois J H, Roggman L A, Casey R J, Ritter J M, Rieser-Danner L A, Jenkins V Y, 1987 "Infant preferences for attractive faces: rudiments of a stereotype?" Developmental Psychology 23 3 6 3 - 3 6 9
    • Langlois J H , Roggman L A, Rieser-Danner L A, 1990 "Infants' differential social responses to attractive and unattractive faces" Developmental Psychology 26 1 5 3 - 1 5 9
    • Lorenz K, 1943 "Die angeborenen Formen moglicher Erfahrung (Innate forms of possible experience)" Zeitschriftfiir Tierpsychologie 5 2 3 3 - 4 0 9
    • Moller A P, 1992 "Female swallow preferences for symmetrical male sexual ornaments" Nature (London) 357 63 75 2 3 8 - 2 4 0
    • Moreland R L, Zajonc R B, 1982 "Exposure effects in person perception: Familiarity, similarity and attraction" Journal ofExperimental Social Psychology 1 8 3 9 5 - 4 1 5
    • Morton J, Johnson M H, 1991 "CONSPEC and CONLEARN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition" Psychological Review 98 1 6 4 - 1 8 1
    • Mothersill M, 1984 Beauty Restored (Oxford: Clarendon Press)
    • Peck H, Peck S, 1970 "A concept of facial aesthetics" Angle Orthodontist 40 284 - 317
    • Samuels C A, 1986 "Bases for the infant's developing self-awareness" Human Development 29 3 6 - 4 8
    • Samuels C A, Ewy R, 1985 "Aesthetic perception of faces during infancy" British Journal of Developmental Psychology 3 2 2 1 - 2 2 8
    • Sappenfield B R, Balogh B, 1970 "Perceived attractiveness of social stimuli as related to their perceived similarity to self Journal ofPsychology 74 1 0 5 - 1 1 1
    • Schneirla T C, 1962 "Psychology, comparative", first published in Encyclopaedia Britannica Reprinted in 1972 in Selected Writings of T C Schneirla Eds L R Aronson, E Tobach, J S Rosenblatt, D Lehrmann (San Francisco, CA: W H Freeman) pp 30 - 86
    • Secord P F, Muthard J E, 1955 "Personalities in faces: IV. A descriptive analysis of the perception of women's faces and the identification of some physiognomic determinants" Journal of Psychology 39 269 - 2 7 8
    • Shapiro B, Eppler M, Haith M, Reis H, 1987 "An event analysis of facial attractiveness and expressiveness", paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore, MD, April 1987
    • Shore I L, 1960 "A cephalometric study of facial symmetry" American Journal of Orthodontics 46 789
    • Walton G E, Bower T G R, 1992 "Newborn discrimination of symmetrical faces", paper presented at the International Conference on Infant Studies, Miami, Florida, USA, May 1992
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article