Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Ely, Adrian; Geall, Sam; Song, Yiching (2016)
Publisher: Elsevier
Journal: Journal of Cleaner Production
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Environmental Science(all), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Strategy and Management
China provides a stark and globally significant illustration of how changing patterns of food production and consumption (especially related to increased intake of animal protein) are creating negative impacts on biodiversity, climate, nitrogen and phosphorous cycles and the use of freshwater. However, China's rapidly growing innovation capabilities and dynamic pattern of development also offer a unique opportunity for transitions towards more sustainable and resilient agri-food systems. Applying a ‘food practices in transition’ framework (Spaargaren et al., 2012), this paper discusses the technological, political and socio-cultural factors central to such systemic changes, with a focus on maize as a core case study. In particular it presents and discusses two contending (but not mutually-exclusive) pathways towards more sustainable maize production and consumption. One, which we call the ‘indigenous innovation’ pathway is framed by ‘systemic rationalities’ and characterised by a focus on R&D-intensive technologies for agricultural intensification, including the controversial use of transgenic phytase maize. The second, which we term the ‘alternative’ pathway, is framed by ‘lifeworld rationalities’ and focusses on improved management practices, shorter supply chains, agro-ecological and participatory research. The two pathways claim different environmental benefits and present different risks and political implications. This paper analyses the food practices in transition in each pathway, identifying links with shifting political conditions and pointing to the increasingly significant role of consumer agency in steering patterns of maize production and consumption in China.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Altenburg, T., Schmitz, H., Stamm, A., 2008. Breakthrough China's and India's transition from production to innovation. World Dev. 36 (2), 325e344.
    • Anagnost, A., 2014. A New Great Leap Forward? China's Urbanization: Implications for Food Security and Rural Well Being. Paper Presented to Conference on Urbanization and Development in China. University of Southampton.
    • Burney, J.A., Davis, S.J., Lobell, D.B., 2010. Greenhouse gas emission by agricultural intensification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107 (26), 12052e12057.
    • Businesswire, 2009. Origin Agritech Limited Reaches Agreement for Novel Glyphosate-tolerance Gene, Worldwide Rights for Genetically Modified (GM) Corn, Soybean, Rice, Cotton, and Canola Products. http://www.businesswire. com/news/home/20090917005626/en/Origin-Agritech-Limited-ReachesAgreement-Glyphosate-Tolerance-Gene (accessed 29.11.13.).
    • Byrne, R., Smith, A., Watson, J., Ockwell, D., 2011. Energy Pathways in Low-carbon Development: from Technology Transfer to Socio-technical Transformation. STEPS Centre, Brighton. STEPS Working Paper 46.
    • Calhoun, C., Yang, G., 2007. Media, civil society, and the rise of a green public sphere in China. China Inf. 21, 211e236.
    • Cong, C., August 18, 2014. China's fight to feed itself is hindered by anti-GM paranoia. Conversat. Available at: https://theconversation.com/chinas-fight-to-feeditself-is-hindered-by-anti-gm-paranoia-30586 (accessed 14.11.14.).
    • Du, L., Rachul, C., 2012. Chinese newspaper coverage of genetically modified organisms. BMC Public Health 12, 326.
    • Ely, A., Scoones, I., 2009. The Global Redistribution of Innovation: Lessons from China and India. STEPS Working Paper 22. STEPS Centre, Brighton.
    • Elzen, B., Geels, F.W., Green, K. (Eds.), 2004. System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
    • Fang, Z., 20 April, 2012. Fang Zhouzi: Huanjing yumi yu huanjing zhu方舟子:环保玉米 与环保猪 (Fang Zhouzi: Environmentally Friendly Maize and Environmentally Friendly Pigs). Xinhua Ribao Dianxun.
    • FAO, 2012. FAOSTAT Maize Production Data/China mainland. http://faostat3.fao.org/ (accessed 28.07 15.).
    • FAO, 2013. FAOSTAT Pork and Chicken Data/China mainland. http://faostat3.fao.org/ (accessed 28.07.15.).
    • FORHEAD e Forum on Health Environment and Development, 2014. Food Safety in China: a Mapping of Problems, Governance and Research. Working Group on Food Safety.
    • Freeman, C., 1996. The greening of technology and models of innovation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 53 (1), 27e39.
    • GAIN (Global Agricultural Information Network) Report, 2009. China e People's Republic of, Biotechnology. GAIN Report Number: CH9091. http://gain.fas.usda. gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Biotechnology_Beijing_China%20-% 20Peoples%20Republic%20of_11-25-2009.pdf (accessed 29.09.14.).
    • Garnett, T., Wilkes, A., 2014. Appetite for Change: Social, Economic and Environmental Transformations in China's Food System. Food Climate Research Network, University of Oxford.
    • Geall, S. (Ed.), 2013. China and the Environment: the Green Revolution. Zed Books, London.
    • Geall, S., 2012. Media coverage of the environment. In: Geall, S., et al. (Eds.), Berkshire Encyclopedia of Sustainability: China, India, and East and Southeast Asia: Assessing Sustainability Great Barrington. Berkshire Publishing, MA.
    • Geels, F., 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res. Policy 31, 1257e1274.
    • Geels, F., Schot, J., 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res. Policy 36, 399e417.
    • Hu, D., Reardon, T., Rozelle, S., Timmer, P., Wang, H., 2004. The emergence of supermarkets with chinese characteristics: challenges and opportunities for China's agricultural development. Dev. Policy Rev. 22 (5), 557e586.
    • Interview (semi-structured) with BY, A Domestic Chinese Environmental NGO Representative, Conducted September 30, 2014, in Beijing.
    • Interview (semi-structured) with CT, A Social Entrepreneur Working with Organic and Ecological Farmers, Conducted September 22, 2014, in Beijing.
    • Interview (semi-structured) with WJ, A Private Sector Worker in Agricultural Biotechnology, Conducted September 25, 2014, in Beijing. (semi-structured).
    • Interview with YH, a domestic Chinese environmental NGO (Yunnan province) representative, conducted September 25, 2014, in Beijing.
    • Interview (semi-structured) with LY, a Chinese academic working with farmers and consumers, conducted September 24, 2014, in Beijing.
    • IPCC, 2014. Summary for policymakers. In: Pachauri, R.K., Meyer, L.A. (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, p. 151.
    • Jia, H., Liu, L., 2014. Unbalanced progress: the hard road from science popularisation to public engagement with science in China. Public Underst. Sci. 23 (1), 32e37.
    • Keeley, J., 2005. Interrogating China's Biotech Revolution: contesting dominant science policy cultures in the risk society. In: Leach, M., Scoones, I., Wynne, B. (Eds.), Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement. Zed Books, London.
    • Kern, F., 2011. Ideas, institutions, and interests: explaining policy divergence in fostering 'system innovations' towards Sustainability. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 29, 1116e1134.
    • Klein, J., 2009. Creating ethical food consumers? Promoting organic Foods in urban Southwest China. Soc. Anthropol. 17 (1), 74e89.
    • Larson, C., 13 February, 2014. E-Commerce Gives a Lift to China's Rural Farmers. Bloomberg Businessweek.
    • Leach, M., Scoones, I., Stirling, A., 2007. Pathways to Sustainability: an Overview of the STEPS Centre Approach. STEPS Centre, Brighton.
    • Leach, M., Scoones, I., Stirling, A., 2010. Dynamic Sustainabilities: Technology, Environment, Social Justice. EarthScan, London.
    • Leach, M., Rockstro€m, J., Raskin, P., Scoones, I., Stirling, A., Smith, A., Thompson, J., Millstone, E., Ely, A., Arond, E., Folke, C., Olsson, P., 2012. Transforming innovation for sustainability. Ecol. Soc. 17 (2), 11.
    • Lema, R., Lema, A., 2012. Technology transfer? The rise of China and India in green technology sectors. Innov. Dev. 2 (1), 23e44.
    • Li, J., Lammerts Van Bueren, E., Jiggins, J., Leeuwis, C., 2012. 'Farmers' adoption of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids and the persistence of landraces in Southwest China: implications for policy and breeding. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 59, 1147e1160.
    • Liu, Y., Cong, C., 2014. Newspaper coverage of genetically modified foods in China. In: Proceedings of the Science and Technology Indicators Conference 2014 Leiden, pp. 380e382.
    • Lockwood, M., 2013. Governance, Innovation and the Transition to a Sustainable Energy System: Perspectives from Economic Theory. EPG Working Paper: 1305.
    • Ma, D., Adams, W., 2014. In Line Behind a Billion People: How Scarcity will Define China's Ascent in the Next Decade. Pearson Education.
    • Mazzucato, M., 2013. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. Anthem Press, London.
    • Meadowcroft, J., 2009. What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sci. 42 (4), 323e340.
    • Normile, D., 2014. China pulls Plug on Genetically Modified Rice and Corn, Science Insider August 20. Available at: http://news.sciencemag.org/asiapacific/ 2014/08/china-pulls-plug-genetically-modified-rice-and-corn (accessed 28.08.14.).
    • Oosterveer, P., Spaargaren, G., 2012. Green consumption practices and emerging sustainable food regimes: the role of consumers, Chapter 6. In: Spaargaren, G., Oosterveer, P., Loeber, A. (Eds.), Food Practices in Transition: Changing Food Consumption, Retail and Production in an Age of Reflexive Modernity. Routledge, Abingdon.
    • Oosterveer, P., 2012. Restructuring food supply: sustainability and supermarkets chapter 7. In: Spaargaren, G., Oosterveer, P., Loeber, A. (Eds.), Food Practices in Transition: Changing Food Consumption, Retail and Production in an Age of Reflexive Modernity. Routledge, Abingdon.
    • Origin Agritech, 2008. GM Phytase Corn Saves Feed Costs and Improves the Environment. http://gmopundit.blogspot.co.uk/2008/02/gm-phytase-corn-savesfeed-costs-and.html (accessed 18.12.13.).
    • Origin Agritech, 2013. Origin Agritech Limited Reports Unaudited Financial Results for the Year Ended September 30, 2012. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/ origin-agritech-limited-reports-unaudited-financial-results-for-the-yearended-september-30-2012-2013-01-08 (accessed 18.12.13.).
    • Paull, J., 2007. China's organic revolution. J. Org. Syst. 2 (1), 1e11.
    • Porter, M.E., van der Linde, C., 1995. Toward a new conception of the environmentcompetitiveness relationship. J. Econ. Perspect. 9 (4), 97e118.
    • Qiu, J., 29 September, 2010. Phosphate fertiliser warning for China. Nature.
    • Reardon, T., Berdegue, J., Timmer, P., 2005. Supermarketization of the “Emerging Markets” of the Pacific Rim: development and trade implications. J. Food Distrib. Res. 36 (1).
    • Rennings, K., 2000. Redefining innovation e eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 32 (2), 319e332.
    • Rip, A., Kemp, R., 1998. Technological change. In: Rayner, S., Malone, E.L. (Eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change. Battelle Press, Columbus OH.
    • Rockstro€m, J., et al., 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461 (7263), 472e475.
    • SAIN, 2011a. UK-China Project on “Improved Nutrient Management in Agriculture e a Key Contribution to the Low Carbon Economy”. UK-China Sustainable Agriculture Innovation Network. http://www.sainonline.org/SAINwebsite(English)/pages/Projects/lowcarbon.html.
    • SAIN, 2011b. Improved Nutrient Management in Agriculture e a Neglected Opportunity for China's Low Carbon Growth Path, Policy Brief No. 1. Sustainable Agricultural Innovation Network. http://www.eu-china.net/upload/pdf/ materialien/11-02-11_PolicyBriefNo1updatedfinal.pdf (accessed 29.07.15).
    • Schmitz, H., 2013. How Does the Global Power Shift Affect the Low Carbon Transformation? Institute of Development Studies, Brighton.
    • SciDev.net, 2009. China makes 'landmark' GM Crop Approval. Available at: http:// www.scidev.net/global/biotechnology/news/china-makes-landmark-gm-foodcrop-approval.html (accessed 29.11.13.).
    • Schneider, M., Sharma, S., 2014. China's Pork Miracle? Agribusiness and Development in China's Pork Industry. Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.
    • Seyfang, G., Smith, A., 2007. Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: towards a new research and policy agenda. Environ. Polit. 16 (4), 584e603.
    • Shove, E., Walker, G., 2010. Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Res. Policy 39 (4), 471e476.
    • Silici, L., 2014. Agroecology: What it is and What it has to Offer, IIED Issue Paper. IIED, London.
    • Smith, A., 2006. Green niches in sustainable development: the case of organic food in the United Kingdom. Environ. Plan. Gov. Policy 24, 439e458.
    • Smith, A., Kern, F., Raven, R., Verhees, B., 2014. Spaces for sustainable innovation: solar photovoltaic electricity in the UK. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 81, 115e130.
    • Smith, L.E.D., Siciliano, G., 2015. A comprehensive review of constraints to improved management of fertilizers in China and mitigation of diffuse water pollution from agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 209 (1), 15e25.
    • Song, Y., Vernooy, R., 2010. Seeds and Synergies: Innovating Rural Development in China. Practical Action Publishing and IDRC, Rugby and Ottawa.
    • Spaargaren, G., 2011. Theories of practices: agency, technology, and culture: exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 813e822.
    • Spaargaren, G., Oosterveer, P., Loeber, A. (Eds.), 2012. Food Practices in Transition: Changing Food Consumption, Retail and Production in an Age of Reflexive Modernity. Routledge, Abingdon.
    • Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockstro€m, J., Cornell, S.E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E.M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S.R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C.A., Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, G.M., Persson, L.M., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B., So€rlin, S., 2015. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347 (6223).
    • Thiers, P., 2002. From grassroots movement to state-coordinated market strategy: the transformation of organic agriculture in China. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 20, 357e373.
    • Tyfield, D., Ely, A., Geall, S., 2015. Low carbon innovation in China: from overlooked opportunities and challenges to transitions in power relations and practices. Sustain. Dev. 23 (4), 206e216.
    • Verhees, B., Raven, R., Veraart, F., Smith, A., Kern, F., 2013. The development of solar PV in the Netherlands: a case of survival in unfriendly contexts. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 19, 275e289.
    • Walker, B., 22 August, 2013. Stemming the Tide of Urban-rural Migration. China dialogue. https://www.chinadialogue.net/books/6312-Stemming-the-tide-ofrural-urban-migration/en.
    • Wu, J., Han, X., 2012. Catalogue of a Crisis, Chinadialogue. Available at: https://www. chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/4946-Catalogue-of-a-crisis (accessed 20.05.14.).
    • Yan, Y., 2012. Food safety and social risk in contemporary China. J. Asian Stud. 71 (3), 705e729.
    • Yan, H., Chen, Y., 2013. Debating the rural cooperative movement in China, the past and the present. J. Peasant Stud. 40 (6), 955e981.
    • Yin, C., 29 May, 2012. We're All Farmers Now. China dialogue. https://www. chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/4944-We-re-all-farmers-now.
    • Zhang, S., Huang, K., Song, Y., 2010. Maize and the formal agricultural research and development system: evolution, challenges, and alternatives. In: Song, Y., Vernooy, R. (Eds.), Seeds and Synergies: Innovation in Rural Development in China. Practical Action Publishing and IDRC, Rugby and Ottawa.
    • Zhang, C., 18 March, 2010. Zhuanjiyin zhisuanmei yumi zai ditanjingjishidai dayoukewei 转基因植酸酶玉米在低碳经济时代大有可为 (GM Phytase Maize has Bright Prospects in the Low-carbon Economic era). People's Daily.
    • Zhang, L., Xu, Y., Oosterveer, P., Mol, A., 2016. Consumer trust in different food provisioning schemes: evidence from Beijing, China. J. Clean. Prod. 134 Part A, 269e279.
    • Zhang, W., Dou, Z., He, P., Ju, X., Powlson, D., Chadwick, D., Norse, D., Lu, Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, L., Chen, X., Cassman, K.G., Zhang, F., 13 May, 2013. New technologies reduce greenhouse-gas emissions from nitrogenous fertilizer in China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
    • Zhang, Y., 26 December, 2013. Celebrity Feud Ramps up GM Food Debate. Global Times.
    • Zi, Y., 2010. Opportunities and risks of genetically modified crops. In: Yang, D. (Ed.), The China Environment Yearbook, Tragedy and Hope, vol. 4. Brill, Leiden.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article