Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Morah, Ejindu Iwelu MacDonald
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
The received wisdom and dominant view hold that market orientation (MO) leads to higher organizational performance. Although widely researched and the literature is replete with studies on the subject, conflicting, contradictory, inconsistent and inconclusive findings beset the marketing domain on the efficacy of MO on organizational performance. These lingering obfuscations and the need to develop a method of implementing the construct underpin the present study. Therefore, this study examines the extent of MO, its effect on objective and subjective performance measures, the roles of mediating and moderating variables in the hypothesised relations and how to implement the construct in organizations within Nigeria.\ud The convergent parallel mixed methods research design is employed to allow for the fusion of breadth and depth in the study. In the quantitative strand, using a random sampling technique, data were collected from a sample of 258 managers in diverse functions in 180 organizations across industries through intensive questionnaire survey in Nigeria. While in the qualitative study, in-depth interview approach was used to interview a sample of 10 managers purposively drawn from micro, small, medium and large organisations representing diverse sectors. Scales well established in the literature and re-validated for the Nigerian context were employed. Confirmatory factor analysis was used for scale validation, structural equation modelling- bootstrapping method in AMOS 21 and hierarchical regression analysis in SPSS 20 for a test of hypotheses.\ud The study finds that (a) inter-functional coordination predicts market share- an objective measure of performance, while no empirical support was found for the effects of composite MO, customer orientation and competitor orientation (b) technological turbulence moderates the inter-functional-coordination-subjective performance links (c) MO and its sub-dimensions have direct and significant effects on subjective performance (d) these relationships are mediated by innovation, learning orientation and total quality management (e) No empirical evidence was found for the moderating roles of market turbulence, competitive intensity and market growth (f) but the moderating variables\ud IV\ud moderate the mediated effects and mediators mediate the moderated effects (g) technology emerged as an antecedent of MO and (h) MO implementation was prescribed drawing on Lewin's model of change.\ud Integrating mediators and moderators in a single model strengthens the MO-performance relations and enhances our understanding of the hypothesised links. Thus, moderated-mediation and mediated-moderation models offer support for the efficacy of MO in varying market conditions. These findings positively and significantly refine the body of extant knowledge regarding the effect of MO on performance and offer an enhanced conceptual framework for academics and practising managers. The study recommends the implementation of MO in conjunction with other strategic orientations for the full benefit to accrue to managers and organizations as higher levels of performance outcomes.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Augusto, C and Coelho, F., 2009. Market orientation and new-to-the-world products: Exploring the moderating effects of innovativeness, competitive strength and environmental forces. Industrial Marketing Management, 38, pp. 94-108.
    • Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F.O., Zhou, Q. and Hartnell, C.A., 2012. Transformational leadership, innovative behaviour, and task performance: Test of mediation and moderation processes. Human Performance, 25, pp. 1-25.
    • Bagozzi, R.P., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: A comment. Journal of Marketing, Vol. XVIII, pp. 375-381.
    • Chung, E, Huang, Y, Fin, B and Sternquist, B., 2011. The impact of market orientation on Chinese retailer's channel relationships. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 26, pp. 14-25.
    • Carnall, C.A, 2007. Managing change in organizations. 5th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
    • Fisher, C., 2010. Researching and writing a dissertation: an essential guide from business students. 3rd ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
    • Dauda, Y.A. and Akingbade, W.A., 2010. Employee's market orientation and business Performance in Nigeria: analysis of small business enterprises in Lagos State, International Journal of Marketing Studies, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 134-43.
    • Ellis, P.D., 2010. Is market orientation affected by the size and diversity of customer network? Management International Review, 50, pp. 325-345.
    • Gainer, B and Padanyi, P., 2005. The relationship between market-oriented activities and market-oriented culture: implications for the development of market orientation in nonprofit service organizations. Journal of Business Research, 58, pp. 854-862.
    • Keelson, S.A., 2012. International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 5(3), pp. 101-114.
    • Korhonen-Sande, S., 2010. Micro-foundations of market orientation: Influencing nonmarketing managers' customer information processing. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, pp. 661-671.
    • Kuster, I and Vila, N., 2011. The market orientation-innovation-success relationship: The role of internationalization strategy. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, Vol.
    • 13, 1, pp. 36-54 Li, C, Lin, C and Chu, C., 2008. The nature of market orientation and the ambidexterity of innovations. Management Decision, Vol. 46, No. 7, pp. 1002-1026.
    • Mills, C.W., 1959. The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
    • Naude, P., Desai, J and Murphy, J., 2003. Identifying the internal determinants of internal marketing orientation. European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 37, No. 9, pp. 1205-1220.
    • Okoroafo, S. C. and Kotabe, M. 1993, "The IMF's Structural Adjustment Program and Its impact on Firm Performance: A Case of Foreign and Domestic Firms in Nigeria", Management International Review, Vol. 33, February, pp. 139-156.
    • O' Leary, Z., 2010. The essential guide to doing your research project. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
    • Oyeniyi, O., 2013. Organizational commitment and market orientation of Nigerian non-oil exporting companies. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 4(1), pp. 95- 108.
    • Ridley, D., 2012. The literature review. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
    • Ro, H.2012. Moderator and mediator effects in hospitality research. International Journal of Hospitality Management. Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 952-961.
    • Shehu, A.M. and Mahmood, R., 2014. Market orientation and firm performance among Nigerian SMEs: The moderating role of business environment. Mediterranean Journal of Social Science, Vol. 5, No. 23, pp. 158-164.
    • Tsiotsou, R.H., and Vlachhopoulou, M., 2011. Understanding the effects of market orientation and e-marketing on service performance. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 141-155.
    • Wensley, R., 2011. Does market orientation make sense? Australasian Marketing Journal, 19, pp. 148-150.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article