Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Mayo, Margarita; Gomez-Mejia, Luis; Firfiray, Shainaz; Berrone, Pascual; Villena, Veronica H. (2016)
Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HD28
Purpose:\ud – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of top leaders beliefs in the importance of work-family balance as a key determinant in explaining the adoption of social practices oriented toward internal stakeholders, focussing on home telework as one of these practices.\ud \ud Design/methodology/approach:\ud – A sample of 2,388 top executive officers reported the senior leaders belief favoring work-family balance by completing a new scale developed for this purpose asking how much key decision makers were convinced of the value to employees of supportive family-friendly HR practices, modeled how to balance work and family life, and felt a personal commitment to implement family-friendly practices. They also reported the firm’s provision of telework and organizational characteristics such as industry, multinational status, and firm size.\ud \ud Findings:\ud – Regression analyses revealed that firm’s provision of telework is more pervasive when its top leaders believe in the importance of work-family balance, even after controlling for firm context (industry, geographical dispersion, and size). More importantly, the authors also find that managerial beliefs augment the positive effect of instrumental factors on the provision of home telework.\ud \ud Practical implications:\ud – For practitioners, the most important message is that, while contextual and organizational features are important in the choice of corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices for employees, the conviction of senior leaders is absolutely essential.\ud \ud Originality/value:\ud – This study contributes to the leadership and CSR literature by suggesting that top leaders play a catalyst role in contexts where telework is instrumentally valued. If we conceive CSR for employees as not driven solely by utilitarian logic, it requires a different paradigm that includes leadership motives.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Aiken L.S., & West S. G. (1991). Multiple regressions: testing and interpreting interactions. Sage: Newbury Park, CA.
    • Allen, D. G., Renn, R. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (2003). The impact of telecommuting design on social systems, self-regulation, and role boundaries. Research in personnel and human resources management, 22, 125-164.
    • Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4): 383-400.
    • Bansal, P. (2003). From issue to actions: the importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science 14(5): 510-527.
    • Baruch, Y. (2000). Teleworking: Benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers. New Technology, Work and Employment 15 (1), 34-49.
    • Baruch, Y.; & Nicholson N. (1997). Home, sweet work: requirements for effective homeworking. Journal of General Management, 23(2): 15-30.
    • Berrone, P., Cruz C., Gomez-Mejia L.R., & Larraza M. (2010). Socio-emotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: do family controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly 55(1): 82-113.
    • Blair-Loy, M., Wharton, A. S., & Goodstein, J. (2011). Exploring the relationship between mission statements and work-life practices in organizations. Organization Studies 32(3): 427- 450.
    • Bloom, N., Kretschmer T., & van Reenen J. (2011). Are family-friendly workplace practices a valuable firm resource? Strategic Management Journal, 32(4): 343-367
    • Brandt, K., & Hulbert J. (1976). Patterns of communications in the multinational corporation: an empirical study. Journal of International Business Studies, 7(1): 57- 64.
    • Buckley, P.J., & Strange R. (2011). The governance of the multinational enterprise: insights from internalization theory. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2): 460-470.
    • Carroll, A. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4): 497-505.
    • Cho, T., & Hambrick D.C. (2006). Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: the case of airline deregulation. Organization Science, 17(4): 453-469.
    • Cohen, E. (2010). CSR for HR: A necessary partnership for enhancing responsible business practices.
    • Cohen, J., Cohen P., West S.G., & Aiken, L.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd edition). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ.
    • Cooper, C.D., & Kurland N. B. (2002). Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4): 511-532.
    • Leader Beliefs and Home Teleworking 33
    • Cordano, M., & Frieze, I.H. (2000). Pollution reduction preferences of U.S. environmental managers: applying Ajzen's theory of planned behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4): 627-641.
    • Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L., & Becerra, M. 2010. Perceptions of benevolence and the design of agency contracts: CEO-TMT relationships in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1): 69-89.
    • Daft, R.L., & Weick K.L. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretive systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2): 284-295.
    • Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
    • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65-91.
    • Dowell, G., Hart, S.L., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46(8): 1059-1074.
    • Etzion, D. (2007). Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992-present: a review. Journal of Management, 33(4): 637-664.
    • Feldman, J.M., & Lynch, J.G, Jr. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3): 421-435.
    • Fell, S.S. (2013). Do work-at-home jobs pay less than office jobs?. http://www.salary.com [April 11, 2013].
    • Ferraro, G. (2010). The cultural dimensions of international business. Pearson/PrenticeHall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
    • Freeman, E.R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
    • Gajendran, R., & Harrison, D. (2007). The good, the bad and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6): 1524-1541.
    • Gajendran, R. S., Harrison, D. A., & Delaney-Klinger, K. (in press). Are Telecommuters Remotely Good Citizens? Unpacking telecommuting's effects on performance via i-deals and job resources. Personnel Psychology. (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/peps.12082/pdf)
    • Gallo, P.J., & Christensen, L.J. (2011). Firm size matters: an empirical investigation of organizational size and ownership on sustainability-related behaviors. Business and Society, 50(2): 315-349.
    • Gareis, K. (2002). The intensity of telework in 2002 in the EU, Switzerland and the US. Paper presented at the International Congress New Work 2002 'Sustainability in the new economy: Designing a new work space. Sustainability and ethical dimensions,' 3-5 September 2002, Badajoz, Spain. Updated version May 2003, www.sibiseu.org
    • Golden, T., Veiga, J.F., & Dino R. (2008). The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6): 1412-1421.
    • Golden, T.D., Veiga, J.F., & Simsek, Z. (2006). Telecommuting's differential impact on work-family conflict: Is there no place like home? Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6): 1340-1350.
    • Mitchell, R.K,. Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853-886.
    • Munir, K. A., & Jones, M. (2004). Discontinuity and after: The social dynamics of technology evolution and dominance. Organization Studies, 25(4): 561-581.
    • Niederman, F., Sumner, M., & Maertz, J.R. (2007). Testing and extending the unfolding model of voluntary turnover to IT professionals. Human Resource Management 46(3): 331-347.
    • Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill: New York.
    • Offstein, E.H., & Morwick, J.M. (2010). Making telework work: Leading people and leveraging technology for high impact results. David-Blacks: London.
    • Olson, M.H., & Primps, S.B. (1984). Working at home with computers: Work and nonwork issues. Journal of Social Issues, 40(3): 97-112.
    • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., & Rynes, S.L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3): 403-441.
    • Overbey, J. A. (2013). Telecommuter intent to leave. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 34(7), 680-699.
    • Leader Beliefs and Home Teleworking 36
    • Pastor, J. C. & Mayo, M. (2008). Transformational leadership among Spanish upper echelons: The role of managerial values and goal orientation. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 29, 4, pp. 340-358.
    • Peters, P., & Heusinkveld, S. (2010). Institutional explanations for managers' attitudes towards telehomeworking. Human Relations, 63(1): 107-135.
    • Peters, P., Oldenkamp, E., Bleijenbergh, I. (2008). The role of national culture in the telework adoption process in a Dutch and French division of a multinational. Paper presented at the 13th ITA Workshop, Krakow, Poland.
    • Pitt-Catsouphes, M., & Googins, B., (2005). Recasting the work-family agenda as a corporate social responsibility. In E. E. Kossek & S. J. Lambert (Eds.). Work and life integration - Organizational, Cultural, and Individual Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    • Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879-903.
    • Powell, W.W. (1991). Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. In The new Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ (eds). University of Chicago Press: Chicago; 183-203.
    • Prahalad, C.K., & Bettis, R.A. (1986). The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(6): 485-501.
    • Pratch, L., & Levinson, H. (2002). Understanding the personality of the executive. In The 21st century executive, Silzer, R (Ed.). Jossey-Bass: San Francisco; 43-77.
    • Raghuram, S., London, M., & Larsen, H.H. (2001). Flexible employment practices in Europe: Country versus culture. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(5): 738-753.
    • Robert, M., & Börjesson, M. (2006). Company incentives and tools for promoting telecommuting. Environment and Behavior, 38(4): 521-549.
    • Ruppel, C., & Harrington, S. (1995). Telework: An innovation where nobody is getting on the band-wagon. Data Base Advances, 26(2-3): 87-104.
    • Savery, L. K., & Luks, A. (2000). Long hours at work: are they dangerous and do people consent to them?. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 21(6), 307-310.
    • Scott, R.W. (2003). Organizations: Rational, open, and natural systems (5th ed.). Pearson Education International: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
    • Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal 43(4): 581-597.
    • Shaw, J.D. (2011). Turnover rates and organizational performance. Organizational Psychology Review 1(3): 187-213.
    • Shellenbarger, S. (1992). Lessons from the workplace: How corporate policies and attitudes lag behind workers´ changing needs. Human Resource Management, 31(3): 157- 169.
    • Sherman, A., Bohlander, G.; & Snell, S. (1998). Managing Human Resources. SouthWestern, Cincinnati).
    • Shin, B., Liu Sheng, O.R., & Higa K. (2000). Telework: Existing research and future directions. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 10(2): 85-101.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok