Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Norman, D. G.; Metcalfe, A.; Barlow, T.; Hutchinson, Charles E.; Thompson, P. J. M.; Spalding, T.; Williams, M. A. (2016)
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: RD

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: musculoskeletal system
Background: \ud The anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has become the subject of much debate. There has been extensive study into attachment points of the native ligament, especially regarding the femoral attachment. Some of these studies have suggested that fibers in the ACL are of differing functional importance. Fibers with higher functional importance would be expected to exert larger mechanical stress on the bone. According to Wolff’s law, cortical thickening would be expected in these areas.\ud \ud Purpose: \ud To examine cortical thickening in the region of the ACL footprint (ie, the functional footprint of the ACL).\ud \ud Study Design: \ud Descriptive laboratory study.\ud \ud Methods: \ud Using micro–computed tomography with resolutions ranging from 71 to 91 μm, the cortical thickness of the lateral wall of the intercondylar notch in 17 cadaveric knees was examined, along with surface topography. After image processing, the relationship between the cortical thickening and surface topology was visually compared.\ud \ud Results: \ud A pattern of cortical thickening consistent with the functional footprint of the ACL was found. On average, this area was 3 times thicker than the surrounding bone and significantly thicker than the remaining lateral wall (P < .0001). This thickening was roughly elliptical in shape (with a mean centroid at 23.5 h:31 t on a Bernard and Hertel grid) and had areas higher on the wall where greater thickness was present. The relationship to previously reported osseous landmarks was variable, although the patterns were broadly consistent with those reported in previous studies describing direct and indirect fibers of the ACL.\ud \ud Conclusion: \ud The findings of this study are consistent with those of recent studies describing fibers in the ACL of differing functional importance. The area in which the thickening was found has been defined and is likely to represent the functional footprint of the ACL.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Bernard M, Hertel P. Intraoperative and postoperative insertion control of anterior cruciate ligament-plasty: a radiologic measuring method (quadrant method). Unfallchirurg. 1996;99:332-340.
    • 2. Bird JH, Carmont MR, Dhillon M, et al. Validation of a new technique to determine midbundle femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(9):1259-1267.
    • 3. Christen P, Ito K, Ellouz R, et al. Bone remodelling in humans is loaddriven but not lazy. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4855.
    • 4. Ciarelli TE, Fyhrie DP, Schaffler MB, Goldstein SA. Variations in threedimensional cancellous bone architecture of the proximal femur in female hip fractures and in controls. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15(1):32-40.
    • 5. Doube M, K1osowski MM, Arganda-Carreras I, et al. BoneJ: Free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ. Bone. 2010;47(6):1076- 1079.
    • 6. Dougherty R, Kunzelmann K-H. Computing local thickness of 3D structures with ImageJ. Microsc Microanal. 2007;13(S02):1678-1679.
    • 7. Ferretti M, Ekdahl M, Shen W, Fu FH. Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(11):1218-1225.
    • 8. Ferretti M, Levicoff EA, Macpherson TA, Moreland MS, Cohen M, Fu FH. The fetal anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic and histologic study. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(3):278-283.
    • 9. Fu FH, Jordan SS. The lateral intercondylar ridge: a key to anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(10):2103-2104.
    • 10. Fu FH, Karlsson J. A long journey to be anatomic. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(9):1151-1153.
    • 11. Hambli R. Connecting mechanics and bone cell activities in the bone remodeling process: an integrated finite element modeling. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2014;2:6.
    • 12. Hildebrand T, Laib A, M u¨ller R, Dequeker J, Ru¨ egsegger P. Direct three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cancellous bone: microstructural data from spine, femur, iliac crest, and calcaneus. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14(7):1167-1174.
    • 13. Hildebrand T, R u¨egsegger P. A new method for the model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images. J Microscopy. 1997;185(1):67-75.
    • 14. Iwahashi T, Shino K, Nakata K, et al. Direct anterior cruciate ligament insertion to the femur assessed by histology and 3-dimensional volume-rendered computed tomography. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(9):S13-S20.
    • 15. Kopf S, Musahl V, Tashman S, Szczodry M, Shen W, Fu FH. A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(3):213-219.
    • 16. McCalden RW, McGeough JA, Barker MB. Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone: the relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(8):1193-1205.
    • 17. Meyer G. Archief fur den anatomische und physiologischen Wissenschaften im Medizin. Die Architektur der Spongiosa. 1867;34:615- 628.
    • 18. Muller M, Moilanen P, Bossy E, et al. Comparison of three ultrasonic axial transmission methods for bone assessment. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31(5):633-642.
    • 19. Nazarian A, von Stechow D, Zurakowski D, M u¨ller R, Snyder BD. Bone volume fraction explains the variation in strength and stiffness of cancellous bone affected by metastatic cancer and osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2008;83(6):368-379.
    • 20. Norman DG, Getgood A, Thornby J, et al. Quantitative topographic anatomy of the femoral ACL footprint: a micro-CT analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2014;52(11):985-995.
    • 21. Piefer JW, Pflugner TR, Hwang MD, Lubowitz JH. Anterior cruciate ligament femoral footprint anatomy: systematic review of the 21st century literature. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(6):872-881.
    • 22. Sasaki N, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, et al. The femoral insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament: discrepancy between macroscopic and histological observations. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(8):1135-1146.
    • 23. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671-675.
    • 24. S´ migielski R, Zdanowicz U, Drwie˛ga M, Ciszek B, Ciszkowska-qyso n´ B, Siebold R. Ribbon like appearance of the midsubstance fibres of the anterior cruciate ligament close to its femoral insertion site: a cadaveric study including 111 knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(11):3143-3150.
    • 25. Sugiyama T, Meakin LB, Browne WJ, Galea GL, Price JS, Lanyon LE. Bones' adaptive response to mechanical loading is essentially linear between the low strains associated with disuse and the high strains associated with the lamellar/woven bone transition. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(8):1784-1793.
    • 26. Sugiyama T, Price JS, Lanyon LE. Functional adaptation to mechanical loading in both cortical and cancellous bone is controlled locally and is confined to the loaded bones. Bone. 2010;46(2):314-321.
    • 27. Tsukada S, Fujishiro H, Watanabe K, et al. Anatomic variations of the lateral intercondylar ridge relationship to the anterior margin of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(5):1110- 1117.
    • 28. van Eck CF, Samuelsson K, Vyas SM, van Dijk CN, Karlsson J, Fu FH. Systematic review on cadaveric studies of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(suppl 1):S101-S108.
    • 29. Webster D, Wirth A, van Lenthe G, M u¨ller R. Experimental and finite element analysis of the mouse caudal vertebrae loading model: prediction of cortical and trabecular bone adaptation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2012;11(1-2):221-230.
    • 30. Wolff J. Das gesetz der transformation der knochen. DMW-Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift. 1892;19(47):1222-1224.
    • 31. Yeni YN, Brown CU, Wang Z, Norman TL. The influence of bone morphology on fracture toughness of the human femur and tibia. Bone. 1997;21(5):453-459.
    • 32. Ziegler CG, Pietrini SD, Westerhaus BD, et al. Arthroscopically pertinent landmarks for tunnel positioning in single-bundle and doublebundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(4):743-752.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article