Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Cockcroft, TW (2016)
Publisher: Hmso
Languages: English
Types: Article
Research into the occupational culture of prison officers has provided some important and enriching accounts of prisons, of the lives of those who live and work in them and the kinds of work that take place within them. Such accounts tend to use police occupational culture as a reference point, if not as a template for such observations. In many respects, this is understandable and a perhaps obvious choice given that prison officers and police officers both work within the criminal justice system. Similarly, the wealth of literature focussing on police occupational culture provides a foundation for understanding and exploring different occupational groups which function within the criminal justice arena. This paper, however, will explore some of the broader differences between the two occupations. The purpose of this is to assess the limits to the usefulness of police occupational culture as a means of understanding the cultural world of prison officers. This is not to understate the similarities between the two occupations and the ways in which these might contribute to similar or shared culturally driven experiences, perceptions and behaviours. What this paper will do, however, is to provide a brief overview of some of the areas of difference which might lead to different cultural reference points.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Manning, P.K. (1977), Police Work: The Social Organization of Policing, Cambridge, Mass. : MIT.
    • Emsley, C. (1996), The English Police: A Political and Social History (2nd Edition), London: Longman.
    • Skolnick, J.H. (1994), Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society (3rd Edition), London: Wiley.
    • Whitaker, B. (1964), The Police, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    • Reiner, R. (1992), The Politics of the Police (2nd Edition), London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    • 6. Roberts, J. (2008), Paper presented at the Commission on English Prisons Today's 'Public Opinion and the Media Seminar' 8 February 2008, Royal Institute of British Architects.
    • 7. Harris, R.N. (1978), 'The Police Academy and the Professional Self-Image' in P.K. Manning and J. Van Maanen (eds) 'Policing: A View from the Street', Santa Monica, Ca. : Goodyear.
    • 8. Klockars, C. (1985), The Idea of Police, Beverley Hills, Ca. : Sage. P.93.
    • 9. Brogden, M. (1982), The Police: Autonomy and Consent, London: Academic Press.
    • 10. Davis, K.C. (1975), Police Discretion, St Paul, Mn. : West.
    • 11. LaFave, W. (1962), The Police and Nonenforcement of the Law - Part II', Wisconsin Law Review, 2: 179-239.
    • 12. Liebling, A. (2000), 'Prison Officers, Policing and the Use of Discretion', Theoretical Criminology, Vol 4(3): 333-357.
    • 13. Chan, J. (1997), Changing Police Culture: Policing In A Multicultural Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • 14. Clarke, R.V.G and Hough, M. (1984), Crime and Police Effectiveness. Home Office Research Study No 79, London: HMSO.
    • 15. Densten, I.L. (1999), 'Senior Australian Law Enforcement Leadership Under Examination', Policing: An International Journal Of Police Strategies and Management, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 45-57.
    • 16. Morgan, R. and Newburn, T. (1997), The Future of Policing, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • 17. Garland, D. (2001), The Culture of Control, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    • 18. Prior, D. (2009), 'The 'Problem' of Anti-Social Behaviour and the Policy Knowledge Base: Analysing the Power/Knowledge Relationship', Critical Social Policy, 29 (1), 5-23.
    • 19. Beattie, I. & Cockcroft, T. (2006), 'Square Pegs and Round Holes: Performance Measurement in the Police and Prison Services', Prison Service Journal, 168.
    • 20. Cockcroft, T. (2015), 'Golden Ages, Red Herrings and Post-Keynesian Policing: Understanding the Role of Police Culture in the Police Professionalism Debate', Nordisk Politiforskning, 2 (2), pp. 182-195.
    • 21. Fournier, V. (1999), 'The Appeal to 'Professionalism' as a Disciplinary Mechanism', The Sociological Review, 47 (2), 280-307.
    • 22. Evetts, J. (2013), 'Professionalism: Value and Ideology', Current Sociology, 61 (5-6), 778-796.
    • 23. Marks, M. (2007), 'Police Unions and their Influence: Subculture or Counterculture', in M. O'Neill, M. Marks and A. Singh (eds.), Police Occupational Culture: New Debates and Directions, New York: Elsevier. P.237.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article