Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Cox, A.M. (2011)
Publisher: International Society for Exploring Teaching and Learning
Languages: English
Types: Article
The last decade has seen a wave of new building across British universities, so that it would appear that despite the virtualization discourses around higher education, space still matters in learning. Yet studies of student experience of the physical space of the university are rather lacking. This paper explores the response of one group of students to learning spaces, including virtual ones, preferences for the location of independent study, and feelings about departmental buildings. It explores how factors such as the scale of higher education and management efficiency tend to produce rather depersonalized and regimented environments that in turn are likely to produce surface engagement. Responses of hospitality, criticality, and solidarity are briefly explored.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Baldry, C. (1999). Space: the final frontier. Sociology, 33(3), 535-553.
    • Bennett, S. (2003). Libraries designed for learning (CLIR Pub. 122). Retrieved from the Council on Library and Information Resources website: http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub122/pub122 web.pdf
    • Bennett, S. (2005). Righting the balance (CLIR Pub. 129). Retrieved from the Council on Library and Information Resources website: http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub129/bennett. html
    • Bennett, S. (2006). The choice of learning, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(1), 3-13.
    • Bennett, S. (2009). Libraries and learning: a history of paradigm change, portal. Libraries and the Academy, 9(2), 181-197.
    • British Education Research Association (2004). British educational research association, revised ethical guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.bera.ac.uk/files/guidelines/ethica1.pdf
    • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(3), 77-101.
    • Chism, N. V. N. (2006). Challenging traditional assumptions and rethinking learning spaces. In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces. Boulder, CO: Educause.
    • Costello, C. Y. (2000). Schooled in the classroom. In E. Margolis (Ed.) The hidden curriculum in higher education (pp. 43-60). London: Routledge.
    • Crawford, W. (1999). Library space: the next frontier? Online, 23(2), 61-2.
    • Edwards, R., & Usher, R. (2003). Putting space back on the map of learning. In R. Edwards & R. Usher (Eds.), Space, curriculum and learning (pp.1-12). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
    • Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz, The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3-30). New York: Basic books.
    • Gulson, K. N., & Symes, C. (2007). Knowing one's place: space, theory, education. Critical Studies in Education, 48(1), 97-110.
    • Halford, S. (2004). Towards a sociology of organizational space, Sociological Research Online 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/9/1/halford.html
    • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: principles and practice (3rd Edition). London: Routledge.
    • Harris, K. (2003). Your third place or mine? Public libraries and local communities. Public Library Journal, 18(20), 26-29.
    • Howell, C. (2008). Thematic analysis: Space. Retrieved from http://www.caret.cam.ac.uk/blogs/llp/wpcontent/uploads/llp_public_t1report_l3_space_fi nal_v06.pdf
    • Jamieson, P. (2009). The serious matter of informal learning. Planning for Higher Education, 37(2), 18-25.
    • Jessop, T., & Smith, A. (2007). Teaching and learning spaces project: A university L&T fellowship project. University of Westminster.
    • Jessop, T., & Smith, A. (2008, July). Spaces, pedagogy and power: A case study. Paper presented at the HEA Annual Conference, Harrogate.
    • Jones, M. O. (1996). Studying organizational symbolism. London: Sage.
    • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. London: Blackwell.
    • Lewis, M. (2010). The University of Sheffield llibrary information commons: A case study, Journal of Library Administration, 50(2), 161- 178.
    • Loxley, A. (2009, September). Myspace? The visualisation of academic identity as articulated through the use of reflexive photo-participation. Paper presented at the 1st International Visual Methods conference, University of Leeds.
    • McGregor, J. (2003). Making spaces: teacher workplace topologies. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 11(3), 353-377.
    • McGregor, J. (2004). Spatiality and the place of the material in schools, Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 12(3), 347-372.
    • MacWhinnie, L. A. (2003). The information commons: The academic library of the future. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(2), 241- 257.
    • Mann, S.J. (2001). Alternative perspective on the student experience: Alienation and engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 7-19.
    • Mannion, G. (2003) Learning, participation and identification through school grounds development, In R. Edwards & R. Usher (Eds.), Space, curriculum and learning (pp. 61-78). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
    • Marmot Associates. (2006). Spaces for learning: A review of learning spaces in further and higher education. Retrieved from http://www.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/Resources/externalresources/sfc-spaces-for-learning
    • Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.
    • Montgomery, T. (2008). Space matters: Experiences of managing static formal learning spaces. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(2), 122-138.
    • Paechter, C. (2004). Metaphors of space in educational theory and practice. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 12(3), 449-463.
    • Prosser, J. (2007). Visual methods and the visual culture of schools. Visual Studies, 22(1), 13-30.
    • Rusbridge, C. (1998). Towards the hybrid library. Dlib magazine. Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july98/rusbridge/07rusb ridge.html
    • Sagan, O. (2008). Playgrounds, studios and hiding places: Emotional exchange in creative learning spaces. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 16(3), 173-186.
    • Soja, E. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.
    • Spencer, M. E. (2006). Evolving a new model: The information commons. Reference Service Review, 34(2), 242-247.
    • Spicer, A., & Hancock, P. (2008). Creating an image of business in the 'new library.' Paper presented at the 1st Workshop on Imagining Business, Oxford.
    • Taylor, S. S. (2002). Overcoming aesthetic muteness: Researching organizational members' aesthetic experience. Human Relations, 55(7), 821-840.
    • Temple, P., & Barnett (2007). Higher education space: Future directions. Planning for Higher Education, 36(1), 5-15.
    • Temple, P. (2007). Learning spaces for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/document s/ourwork/research/Learning%20spaces%20for%20t he%2021st%20century.pdf
    • Thomson, P. (2007). Working with invisible geography of school exclusion, In K. N. Gulson. & C. Symes (Eds.), Spatial theories of education (pp. 111-130). New York: Routledge.
    • Tian, K., & Belk, R. W. (2005). Extended self and possessions in the workplace. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 297-310.
    • Usher, R. (2002). Putting space back on the map: Globalisation, place and identity. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 34(1), 41-55.
    • Warren, S. (2002). 'Show me how it feels to work here': Using photography to research organizational aesthetics. Ephemera, 2(3), 224-245.
    • Watson, L. (2007). Building the future of learning. European Journal of Education, 42(2), 255-263.
    • Wilson, A., & Cervero, R. M. (2003). A geography of power, identity, and difference in adult education curriculum practice. In r. Edwards & U. Usher (Eds.), Space, curriculum and learning (pp. 123-138). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article