Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Marselle, MR; Irvine, KN; Lorenzo-Arribas, A; Warber, SN (2016)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: human activities
Natural environments are associated with positive health and well-being. However, little is known about the influence of environmental qualities on well-being and the mechanisms underlying this association. This study explored whether perceived restorativeness and it subscales would mediate the effects of perceived biodiversity, perceived naturalness, walk duration and perceived intensity on emotional well-being.\ud \ud Participants (n = 127) of a national walking program in England completed pre- and post-walk questionnaires (n = 1009) for each group walk attended within a 13-week period. Multilevel mediation examined the hypothesised indirect effects.\ud \ud Perceived restorativeness mediated the effects of perceived bird biodiversity, perceived naturalness, and perceived walk intensity on positive affect, happiness and negative affect. The effect of walk duration on happiness was also mediated by perceived restorativeness. Perceived walk intensity had a direct effect on positive affect and happiness.\ud \ud Findings have implications for theory development, future biodiversity-health research and practitioners interested in designing restorative environments.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • health? A multi-study analysis. Environmental Science and Technology, 44(10), 3947-3955.
    • Bauer, D. J., Preacher, K. J., & Gil, K. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects Berman, M., Kross, E., Krpan, K., Askren, M., Burson, A., Deldin, P., . . . Jonides, J. (2012).
    • Brown, A. M., Johnston, L., Currie, M. & Muñoz, S. (2011). A contribution to the evidence base for Cracknell, D., White, M. P., Pahl, S., Nichols, W. J., & Depledge, M. H. (2015). Marine biota Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences.
    • Hipp, J. A., Gulwadi, G. B., Alves, S., & Sequeria, S. (2015). The relationship between perceived Johansson, M., Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2011). Psychological benefits of walking: Moderation by Marselle, M. R., Irvine, K. N., Lorenzo-Arribas, A., & Warber, S. L. (2015). Moving beyond green: Ostir, G. V., Markides, K. S., Black, S. A., & Goodwin, J. S. (2000). Emotional well-being predicts Pasini, M., Berto, R., Brondino, M., Hall, R., & Ortner, C. (2014). How to measure the restorative van Dillen, S. M. E., de Vries, S., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2012). Greenspace in
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article