Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Dick, Gavin P.M.; Heras‐Saizarbitoria, Iñaki; Molina-Azorin, Jose F. (2011)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HF5351
Abstract: The paper explores the bi-directional relationship between ISO 14001 certification and financial performance with the aim of shedding light on whether better performance is due to the beneficial effects of ISO 14001 or due to selection-effects where better performance precedes accreditation. The study uses a five year longitudinal analysis to compare the financial performance of firms in Spain before and after certification. The results of a multivariate panel data analysis find that firms with better than average performance have a greater propensity to pursue accreditation but there is no evidence that improvements in performance follow certification. This suggests that a zealous inference of environmental variables being the cause of improved financial performance may be unwise in research studies that can only measure association.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Al-Tuwaijri, S., Christensen, T., Hughes, K., 2004. The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29, 447e471.
    • Ambec, S., Lanoie, P., 2008. Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. The Academy of Management Executive 22 (4), 45e62.
    • Angrist, J.D., Pischke, J.S., 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics. An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press, Oxford.
    • Anton, W.R.Q., Deltas, G., Khanna, M., 2004. Incentives for environmental selfregulation and implications for environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48, 632e654.
    • Barnett, M., Salomon, R., 2006. Beyond dichotomy: the curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 27, 1101e1122.
    • Brammer, S., Millington, A., 2008. Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 29, 1325e1343.
    • Cañón, J., Garcés, C., 2006. Repercusión económica de la certificación medioambiental ISO 14001. Cuadernos de Gestión 6 (1), 45e62.
    • Cascio, J., 1996. The ISO 14000 Handbook. CEEM Information Services, New York.
    • Cheremisinoff, N.P., Bendavid-Val, A., 2001. Green Profits: The Manager's Handbook for ISO 14001 and Pollution Prevention. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston.
    • Christmann, P., 2000. Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: the role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal 43, 663e680.
    • Clarkson, M., 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20, 92e117.
    • Cohen, M., Fenn, S., Naimon, J., 1995. Environmental and Financial Performance: Are They Related? Working Paper. Vanderbilt University, Nashville.
    • Corbett, C.J., Montes-Sancho, M.J., Kirsch, D.A., 2005. The financial impact of ISO 9000 Certification in the United States: an empirical analysis. Management Science 51 (7), 1046e1059.
    • Cordeiro, J., Sarkis, J., 1997. Environmental proactivism and firm performance: evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts. Business Strategy and the Environment 6, 104e114.
    • Dahlström, K., Skea, J., 2002. EMSs and operator performance at sites regulated under integrated pollution control. Draft Research and Development Technical Report P6/TR, Prepared by the Policy Studies Institute. United Kingdom Environmental Agency, Bristol, England.
    • De Burgos, J., Céspedes, J., 2001. La protección ambiental y el resultado. Un análisis crítico de su relación. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa 7, 93e108.
    • Devinney, T., 2009. Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives 23 (2), 44e56.
    • Dick, G.P.M., Heras, I., Casadesús, M., 2008. Shedding light on causations between ISO 9001 and improved business performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 28 (9), 687e708.
    • Donaldson, T., Preston, L., 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review 20, 65e91.
    • Edwards, D., 1998. The Link between Company Environmental and Financial Performance. Earthscan Publications, London.
    • Elkington, J., 1994. Towards the sustainable corporation: winewinewin business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review 36, 90e100.
    • Florida, R., Davidson, D., 2001. Gaining from green management: EMSsinside and outside the factory. California Management Review 43 (3), 64e84.
    • Fryxell, G.E., Szeto, A., 2002. The influence of motivations for seeking ISO 14001 certification: an empirical study of ISO 14001 certified facilities in Hong Kong. Journal of Environmental Management 65 (3), 223e238.
    • Gavronski, I., Ferrer, G., Paiva, E., 2008. ISO 14001 certification in Brazil: motivations and benefits. Journal of Cleaner Production 16, 87e94.
    • Gilley, K., Worrell, D., El-Jelly, A., 2000. Corporate environmental initiatives and anticipated firm performance: the differential effects of process-driven versus product-driven greening initiatives. Journal of Management 26, 1199e1216.
    • Godfrey, P., Merrill, C., Hansen, J., 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal 30, 425e445.
    • González-Benito, J., González-Benito, O., 2005. Environmental proactivity and business performance: an empirical analysis. Omega 33, 1e15.
    • Graff, S., 1997; NovembereDecember. ISO 14000: should your company develop an environmental management system? Industrial Management, 19e22.
    • Greene, W.H., 2008. Econometric Analysis, sixth ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
    • Griffin, J., Mahon, J., 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate. Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society 36 (1), 5e31.
    • Hamilton, J., 1995. Pollution as news: media and stock market reactions to the Toxics Release Inventory Data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28, 98e113.
    • Hamschmidt, J., Dyllick, T., 2001. ISO 14001: profitable? Yes! but is it eco-effective? Greener Management International 36, 43e54.
    • Hart, S., Ahuja, G., 1996. Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment 5, 30e37.
    • Hart, S., 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20, 986e1014.
    • Hart, S., 1997. Beyond greening: strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review 75, 66e76.
    • Heras, I., Dick, G.P.M., Casadesus, M., 2002. ISO 9000 registration's impact on sales and profitability. A longitudinal analysis of performance before and after accreditation. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 19 (6), 774e791.
    • Heras, I., Arana, G., Díaz de Junguitu, A., Espí, M., Molina, J.F., 2008. Los SGM y la competitividad de las empresas de la CAPV. Instituto Vasco de Competitividad, San Sebastián.
    • Huber, G.P., Power, D.J., 1985. Retrospective reports of strategic level managers: guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management Journal 6 (2), 171e180.
    • Huber, P.J., 1967. The behaviour of maximum-likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 1, pp. 221e223.
    • Hull, C., Rothenberg, S., 2008. Firm performance: the interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal 29, 781e789.
    • ISO. The ISO survey of ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 Certifications: 18th cycle, ISO 2009, Geneva.
    • Jaffe, A., Peterson, S., Portney, P., Stavins, R., 1995. Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us? Journal of Economic Literature 33 (1), 132e163.
    • Jones, T., 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review 20, 404e437.
    • Judge, W., Douglas, T., 1998. Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: an empirical assessment. Journal of Management Studies 35, 241e262.
    • Ketokivi, M.A., Schroeder, R.G., 2004. Perceptual measures of performance: fact or fiction? Journal of Operations Management 22 (3), 247e264.
    • Khanna, M., Damon, L., 1999. EPA's Voluntary 33/50 Program: impact on toxic releases and economic performance of firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37, 1e25.
    • King, A., Lenox, M., 2002. Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science 48, 289e299.
    • King, A., Lenox, M., Terlaak, A.K., 2005. The strategic use of decentralized institutions: exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Academy of Management Journal 48 (6), 1091e1106.
    • Klassen, R., McLaughlin, C., 1996. The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science 42, 1199e1214.
    • Lee, M., 2008. A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews 10, 53e73.
    • Link, S., Naveh, E., 2006. Standardization and discretion: does the environmental standard ISO 14001 lead to performance benefits? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 53, 508e519.
    • Marcus, P.A., Willig, J.T., 1997. Moving Ahead with ISO 14001: Improving Environmental Management and Advancing Sustainable Development. John Wiley, New York.
    • Margolis, J., Walsh, J., 2003. Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly 48, 268e305.
    • Margolis, J., Elfenbein, H., Walsh, J., 1997. Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Working Paper. Harvard University.
    • McGuire, J., Sundgren, A., Schneeweis, T., 1988. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 31 (4), 854e872.
    • McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal 21, 603e609.
    • Melnyk, S., Sroufe, R., Calantone, R., 2003. Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of Operations Management 21, 329e351.
    • Menguc, B., Ozanne, L., 2005. Challenges of the “green imperative”: a natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientationebusiness performance relationship. Journal of Business Research 58, 430e438.
    • Miles, M., Covin, J., 2000. Environmental marketing: a source of reputational, competitive, and financial advantage. Journal of Business Ethics 2000 (23), 299e311.
    • Morris, A.S., 2003. ISO 14000 Environmental Management Standards: Engineering and Financial Aspects. John Wiley, London.
    • Morrow, D., Rondinelli, D., 2002. Adopting corporate environmental management systems: motivations and results of ISO 14001 and EMAS certification. European Management Journal 20 (2), 159e171.
    • Nakamura, M., Takahashi, T., Vertinsky, I., 2001. Why Japanese firms chose to certify: a study of managerial responses to environmental issues. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 42, 23e52.
    • Nakao, Y., Amano, A., Matsumura, K., Genba, K., Nakano, M., 2007. Relationship between environmental performance and financial performance: an empirical analysis of Japanese corporations. Business Strategy and the Environment 16, 106e118.
    • Naveh, E., Marcus, A., 2005. Achieving competitive advantage through implementing a replicable management standard: installing and using ISO 9000. Journal of Operations Management 24 (1), 1e26.
    • Nawrocka, D., Parker, T., 2009. Finding the connection: EMSd and environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production 17 (6), 601e607.
    • NDEMS, 2003. Environmental management systems: do they improve performance? NDEMS, National Database on Environmental Management Systems. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
    • Nishitani, K., 2009. An empirical study of the initial adoption of ISO 14001 in Japanese manufacturing firms. Ecological Economics 68 (3), 669e679.
    • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F., Rynes, S., 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies 24 (3), 403e441.
    • Peloza, J., 2009. The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management 35 (6), 1518e1541.
    • Podsakoff, P.M., Organ, D.W., 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management 12 (4), 531e544.
    • Poksinska, B., Dahlgaard, J., Eklund, 2003. Implementing ISO 14000 in Sweden: motives, benefits and comparisons with ISO 9000. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 20 (5), 585e606.
    • Porter, M., Van der Linde, C., 1995. Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review 73, 120e134.
    • Potoski, M., Prakash, A., 2005. Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities' environmental performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24 (4), 745e769.
    • Preston, L., O'Bannon, D., 1997. The corporate social-financial performance relationship. A typology and analysis. Business & Society 36 (4), 419e429.
    • Rivera, J., de Leon, P., Koerber, C., 2000. Is Greener whiter yet? The sustainable slopes program after five years. Political Studies Journal 34 (2), 195e221.
    • Rondinelli, D.A., Vastag, G., 2000. Panacea common sense or just a label? The value of ISO 14001 environmental management systems. European Management Journal 18 (5), 499e510.
    • Russo, M., Fouts, P., 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40, 534e559.
    • Russo, M., Harrison, 2001. An empirical study of the impact of ISO 14001 registration on emissions performance. In: Paper Presented at the Ninth Greening of Industry Network Annual Conference, Bangkok, Thailand.
    • Safizadeh, M.H., Ritzman, L.P., 1997. Linking performance drivers in production planning and inventory control to process choice. Journal of Operations Management 15 (4), 389e403.
    • Schaltegger, S., Synnestvedt, T., 2002. The link between 'green' and economic success: environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance. Journal of Environmental Management 65, 339e346.
    • Schmidheiny, S., 1992. Changing Course: A Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment. MIT Press, Cambridge.
    • Schylander, E., Martinuzzi, A., 2007. ISO 14001-experiences, effects and future challenges: a national study in Austria. Business Strategy and the Environment 16 (2), 133e147.
    • Sharma, S., Vredenburg, H., 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 19, 729e753.
    • Sheldon, C., 1997. ISO 14001 and Beyond: Environmental Management Systems in the Real World. Greanleaf, Sheffield.
    • Shrivastava, P., 1995. Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 16 (Summer Special Issue), 183e200.
    • Starik, M., Marcus, A., 2000. Introduction to the Special Research Forum on the Management of Organizations in the Natural Environment: a field emerging from multiple paths, with many challenges ahead. Academy of Management Journal 43, 539e546.
    • Sulaiman, M., Ahmad, N.N., Alwi, N., 2002. Management accounting practices in Malaysia: a survey of the industrial and consumer products sectors. Unpublished Research Report. International Islamic University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
    • Summers, S., 2002. Implementing ISO 14001: an international survey assessing the benefits of certification. Corporate Environmental Strategy 9 (4), 418e427.
    • Szymanski, M., Tiwari, P., 2004. ISO 14001 and the reduction of toxic emissions. Political Reform 7 (1), 31e42.
    • Taylor, S., 1992; September. Green management: the next competitive weapon. Futures, 669e680.
    • Terlaak, A., King, A., 2006. The effect of certification with ISO 9000 Quality Management Standards: a signalling approach. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 60 (4), 579e602.
    • Toffel, M.W., 2006. Resolving information asymmetries in markets: the role of certified management programs. Harvard Business School Working Paper (No. 07e023).
    • Trung, D.N., Kumar, S., 2005. Resource use and waste management in Vietnam hotel industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 13, 109e116.
    • Ullmann, A., 1985. Data in search of a theory: a critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review 10 (3), 540e557.
    • Van Der Veldt, D., 1997. Case studies of ISO 14001: a new business guide for global environmental protection. Environmental Quality Management 7 (1), 1e19.
    • Vendrell-Herrero, F., 2008. Transfer of Knowledge from the lab to the market: the idiosyncrasy of academic entrepreneurs. Doctoral Thesis. Barcelona: Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.
    • Wagner, M., Van Phu, N., Azomahou, T., Wehrmeyer, W., 2002. The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: an empirical analysis of the European paper industry. Corporate Social-Responsibility and Environmental Management 9, 133e146.
    • Wagner, M., 2005. How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: corporate environmental strategies in the European paper industry. Journal of Environmental Management 76, 105e118.
    • Wahba, H., 2008. Does the market value corporate environmental responsibility? An empirical examination. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15 (2), 89e99.
    • Walley, N., Whitehead, B., 1994. It's not easy being green. Harvard Business Review 72 (3), 46e52.
    • Walsh, J., Weber, K., Margolis, J., 2003. Social issues and management: our lost cause found. Journal of Management 29 (6), 859e881.
    • Watson, K., Klingenberg, B., Polito, T., Geurts, T.G., 2004. Impact of EMS implementation on financial performance. Management of Environmental Quality 15, 622e628.
    • Wayhan, V.B., Balderson, E.L., 2007. TQM and financial performance: a research standard. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 18 (4), 393e401.
    • Wayhan, V.B., Kirche, E.T., Khumawala, B.M., 2002. ISO 9000 certification: the financial performance implications. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 13, 217e231.
    • White, H., 1982. Maximum likelihood of misspecified models. Econometrica 50, 1e25.
    • Woodside, G., 2000. ISO 14001 Auditing Manual. McGraw-Hill, NewYork.
    • Zutshi, A., Sohal, A., 2004. EMS adoption by Australasian organizations: part 1: reasons, benefits and impediments. Technovation 24, 335e357.
    • Zutshi, A., Sohal, A., 2005. Integrated management system. The experiences of three Australian organisations. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 16 (2), 211e232.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article