LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Butler, Michael J. R. (2014)
Publisher: Frontiers Media S.A.
Journal: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Opinion Article, neurosciences, co-production research, Neuroscience, organizational cognitive neuroscience, organizational sciences, interdisciplinary communication, organizational behavior, organizational neuroscience
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Becker, W. J., Cropanzano, R., and Sanfey, A. G. (2011). Organizational cognitive neuroscience: taking organizational theory inside the neural black box. J. Manage. 37, 933-961.doi: 10.1177/0149206311398955
    • Boyatzis, R. E., Passarelli, A. M., Koenig, K., Lowe, M., Mathew, B., Stoller, J. K., et al. (2012). Examination of the neural substrates activated in memories of experiences with resonant and dissonant leaders. Leadersh. Q. 23, 259-272. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.08.003
    • Brammer, M. (2004). Correspondence-brain scam? Nat. Neurosci. 7, 1015. doi: 10.1038/nn1004-1015
    • Bronowski, J. (1978). The Origins of Knowledge and Imagination. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.
    • Butler, M. J. R. (2003). Managing from the inside out: drawing on “receptivity” to explain variation in strategy implementation. Br. J. Manage. 14, S47-S60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2003.00392.x
    • Butler, M. J. R. (2008). Neuromarketing and the perception of knowledge. J. Consum. Behav. 7, 415-419. doi: 10.1002/cb.260
    • Butler, M. J. R., and Allen, P. (2008). Understanding policy implementation processes as self-organizing systems. Public Manage. Rev. 10, 421-440. doi: 10.1080/14719030802002923
    • Butler, M. J. R., and Senior, C. (2007). Towards an organizational cognitive neuroscience. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1118, 1-17. doi: 10.1196/annals.1412.009
    • Callon, M., Law, J., and Rip, A. (eds.) (1986). Mapping the Dynamics of Science and TechnologySociology of Science in the Real World. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
    • Clegg, S. R., and Palmer, G. (eds.) (1996). The Politics of Management Knowledge. London: Sage.
    • Cropanzano, R., and Becker, W. J. (2013). The promise and peril of organizational neuroscience: today and tomorrow. J. Manage. Inq. 22, 306-310. doi: 10.1177/1056492613478518
    • Doherty, G. (1994). Can we have a unified theory of quality? High. Educ. Qual. 48, 240-255. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.1994.tb01656.x
    • Edwards, P. (2013). Neuroscience and Reductionism: Some Realist Reflections. Birmingham Business School, Discussion Paper Series, 2013-2008.
    • Fugate, D. L. (2007). Neuromarketing: a layman's look at neuroscience and its potential application to marketing practice. J. Consum. Mark. 24, 385-394. doi: 10.1108/07363760710834807
    • Gibbons, M. L., Limoges, C., Nowotney, S., Schwartman, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
    • Hannaford, A. (2013). Neuromarketing: Can Science Predict What We'll Buy? The Telegraph. 13 April. [Accessed: 30 September 2013]. Available online at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/sciencenews/9984498/Neuromarketing-can-sciencepredict-what-well-buy.html
    • Lee, N. J., Senior, C., and Butler, M. J. R. (2012a). The domain of organizational cognitive neuroscience: theoretical and empirical challenges. J. Manage. 38, 921-931. doi: 10.1177/0149206312 439471
    • Lee, N., Senior, C., and Butler, M. J. R. (2012b). Leadership research and cognitive neuroscienceThe state of the union. Leadersh. Q. 23, 213-218. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.08.001
    • Lindebaum, D. (2012). I rebel-Therefore we exist: emotional standardization in organizations and the emotionally intelligent individual. J. Manage. Inq. 21, 262-277. doi: 10.1177/1056492611430125
    • Lindebaum, D., and Zundel, M. (2013a). Not quite a revolution: scrutinizing organizational cognitive neuroscience in leadership studies. Hum. Relat. 66, 857-877. doi: 10.1177/0018726713482151
    • Lindebaum, D., and Zundel, M. (2013b). Neuron Firing and Hiring. Times Higher Education. [Accessed: 30 September 2013]. Available online at: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/whatmakes-a-good-leader-dont-ask-aneuron-say-dirklindebaum-and-mikezundel/2004183.article
    • Perkmann, M., and Walsh, K. (2007). Universityindustry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda. Int. J. Manage. Rev. 9, 259-280. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007. 00225.x
    • Stiles, D. R. (2004). Narcissus revisited: the values of management academics and their role in business school strategies in the UK and Canada. Br. J. Manage. 15, 157-175. doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 8551.2004.00412.x
    • Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
    • Tushman, M., and O'Reilly, III. C. (2007). Research and relevance: implications of Pasteur's quadrant for doctoral programs and faculty development. Acad. Manage. J. 50, 769-774. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279169
    • Tushman, M. L., O'Reilly, C. A., Fenollosa, A., Kleinbaum, A. M., and McGrath, D. (2007). Relevance and rigor: executive education as a lever in shaping practice and research. Acad. Manage. Learn. 6, 345-362. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2007.26361625
    • Waldman, D. A. (2013). Interdisciplinary research is the key. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:562. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00562
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.