Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Woolf, C.; Caute, A.; Haigh, Z.; Galliers, J. R.; Wilson, S.; Kessie, A.; Hirani, S. P.; Hegarty, B.; Marshall, J. (2016)
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: RC
Objective: To test the feasibility of a Randomised Controlled Trial comparing face to face and remotely delivered word finding therapy for people with aphasia \ud \ud Design: A quasi-randomised controlled feasibility study comparing remote therapy delivered from a University lab, remote therapy delivered from a clinical site, face to face therapy and an attention control condition\ud \ud Setting: A University lab and NHS outpatient service \ud \ud Participants: Twenty-one people with aphasia following left hemisphere stroke \ud \ud Interventions: Eight sessions of word finding therapy, delivered either face to face or remotely, were compared to an attention control condition comprising eight sessions of remotely delivered supported conversation. The remote conditions used mainstream video conferencing technology.\ud \ud Outcome measures: Feasibility was assessed by recruitment and attrition rates, participant observations and interviews, and treatment fidelity checking. Effects of therapy on word retrieval were assessed by tests of picture naming and naming in conversation.\ud \ud Results: Twenty-one participants were recruited over 17 months, with one lost at baseline. Compliance and satisfaction with the intervention was good. Treatment fidelity was high for both remote and face to face delivery (1251/1421 therapist behaviours were compliant with the protocol). Participants who received therapy improved on picture naming significantly more than controls (mean numerical gains: 20.2 (remote from University); 41 (remote from clinical site); 30.8 (face to face); 5.8 (attention control); p <.001). There were no significant differences between groups in the assessment of conversation.\ud \ud Conclusions: Word finding therapy can be delivered via mainstream internet video conferencing. Therapy improved picture naming, but not naming in conversation.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J, Sheldenkar A, et al. Self-reported long-term needs after stroke. Stroke 2011; 42(5):1398-403.
    • 4. Feigin V, Lawes C, Bennett D, and Anderson C. Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century. The Lancet Neurology 2003; 2: 43-53.
    • 5. Johansson T and Wild C. (2011).Telerehabilitation in stroke care-a systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2011; 17(1), 1-6. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.100105.
    • 6. Holden M, Dyar T and Dayan-Cimadoro L. Telerehabilitation using a virtual environment improves upper extremity function in patients with stroke. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 2007; 15: 36 - 42.
    • 7. Piron L, Tonin P, Trivello E, Battisin L and Dam M. Motor tele-rehabilitation in post stroke patients. Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine 2004; 29: 119 - 125.
    • 8. Huijgen B, Vollenbroek-Hutten M, Zampolini M. et al. Feasibility of a home based telerehabilitation system compared to usual care: arm/hand function in patients with stroke, traumatic brain injury and multiple sclerosis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2008; 14: 249 - 256.
    • 9. Taylor D, Cameron J, Walsh L, et al. Exploring the feasibility of videoconference delivery of a selfmanagement program to rural participants with stroke. Telemedicine and eHealth 2009: 15: 646 - 654.
    • 11. Theodoros D, Hill A, Russell T, et al. Assessing acquired language disorders in adults via the Internet, Journal of Telemedicine and e- Health 2008; 14: 552-559.
    • 12. Hill A, Theodoros D, Russell T. et al. The effects of aphasia severity on the ability to assess language disorders via telerehabilitation. Aphasiology 2009; 23: 627-642.
    • 13. Palsbo S. Equivalence of functional communication assessment in speech pathology using videoconferencing. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2007; 13: 40-3
    • 14. Brennan D, Georgeadis A, Baron C and Barker L. The effect of videoconference-based telerehabilitation on story retelling performance by brain-injured subjects and its implications for remote speech-language therapy. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health 2004; 10: 147-154.
    • 15. Georgeadis C, Brennan D, Barker M, and Baron C. Telerehabilitation and its effect on story retelling by adults with neurogenic communication disorders. Aphasiology 2004; 18: 639-652.
    • 16. Agostini M, Garzon M, Benavides-Varela S, et al. Telerehabilitation in Poststroke Anomia. Biomed Research International, 2014(1)
    • 17. DechĂȘne L, Tousignant M, Boissy P. et al. Simulated In-home Teletreatment for Anomia. International Journal of Telerehabilitation 2011; 3, 2, doi: 10.5195/ijt.2011.6075 18. Fridler N, Rosen K, Herzberg O, et al. Tele-Rehabilitation Therapy vs. Face-to-Face Therapy for Aphasic Patients. eTELEMED 2012 : The Fourth International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine 2012. ISBN: 978-1-61208-179-3
    • 19. Furnas D and Edmonds L. The Effect of Computerized Verb Network Strengthening Treatment on Lexical Retrieval in Aphasia. Aphasiology 2014; 28: 401 - 420.
    • 20. Goldberg S, Haley K and Jacks A. Script Training and Generalization for People with Aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2012; 21: 222-238.
    • 21. Mortley J, Wade J, Hughes A and Enderby P. Effectiveness of computerised rehabilitation for long term aphasia: A case series study. British Journal of General Practice 2004; 54: 856 - 857.
    • 22. Mortley J, Wade J, and Enderby P. Superhighway to promoting a client-therapist partnership? Using the internet to deliver word-retrieval computer therapy. Aphasiology 2004; 18: 193 - 211.
    • 23. Wade J, Mortley J. and Enderby P. Talk about IT: Views of people with aphasia and their partners on receiving remotely monitored computer-based word finding therapy. Aphasiology 2004; 17: 1031 - 1056.
    • 24. Nickels L. Therapy for naming disorders: revisiting, revising and reviewing. Aphasiology 2002; 16: 935-980.
    • 25. Doesborgh S,Van de Sandt-Koenderman M, Dippel D. et al. Effects of semantic treatment on verbal communication and linguistic processing in aphasia after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2004; 35: 141-6.
    • 35. Palmer R, Enderby P, Cooper C, Latimer N, Julious S, Paterson G, Dimairo M, Dixon S, Mortley J, Hilton R, Delaney A and Hughes H, Computer therapy compared with usual care for people with long-standing aphasia poststroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2012, 43: 1904-1911 44. Office for National Statistics Internet Access - Households and Individuals, http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/rdit2/internet-access---households-and-individuals/2013/stb-ia2013.html (2013, accessed August 2014)
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article