Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Brennan-Jones, Christopher G; White, Joanna D; Rush, Robert; Law, James (2014)
Publisher: The Cochrane Collaboration
Languages: English
Types: Article
Background\ud \ud Congenital or early-acquired hearing impairment poses a major barrier to the development of spoken language and communication. Early detection and effective (re)habilitative interventions are essential for parents and families who wish their children to achieve age-appropriate spoken language. Auditory-verbal therapy (AVT) is a (re)habilitative approach aimed at children with hearing impairments. AVT comprises intensive early intervention therapy sessions with a focus on audition, technological management and involvement of the child's caregivers in therapy sessions; it is typically the only therapy approach used to specifically promote avoidance or exclusion of non-auditory facial communication. The primary goal of AVT is to achieve age-appropriate spoken language and for this to be used as the primary or sole method of communication. AVT programmes are expanding throughout the world; however, little evidence can be found on the effectiveness of the intervention.\ud \ud \ud Objectives\ud \ud To assess the effectiveness of auditory-verbal therapy (AVT) in developing receptive and expressive spoken language in children who are hearing impaired.\ud \ud \ud Search methods\ud \ud CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, speechBITE and eight other databases were searched in March 2013. We also searched two trials registers and three theses repositories, checked reference lists and contacted study authors to identify additional studies.\ud \ud \ud Selection criteria\ud \ud The review considered prospective randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised studies of children (birth to 18 years) with a significant (≥ 40 dBHL) permanent (congenital or early-acquired) hearing impairment, undergoing a programme of auditory-verbal therapy, administered by a certified auditory-verbal therapist for a period of at least six months. Comparison groups considered for inclusion were waiting list and treatment as usual controls.\ud \ud \ud Data collection and analysis\ud \ud Two review authors independently assessed titles and abstracts identified from the searches and obtained full-text versions of all potentially relevant articles. Articles were independently assessed by two review authors for design and risk of bias. In addition to outcome data, a range of variables related to participant groups and outcomes were documented.\ud \ud \ud Main results\ud \ud Of 2233 titles and abstracts searched, only 13 abstracts appeared to meet inclusion criteria. All 13 full-text articles were excluded following independent evaluation by two review authors (CGBJ and JW), as they did not meet the inclusion criteria related to the research design. Thus, no studies are included in this review.\ud \ud \ud Authors' conclusions\ud \ud This review confirms the lack of well-controlled studies addressing the use of AVT as an intervention for promoting spoken language development in children with permanent hearing impairments. Whilst lack of evidence does not necessarily imply lack of effect, it is at present not possible for conclusions to be drawn as to the effectiveness of this intervention in treating children with permanent hearing impairments.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • The following databases were searched between 25 March 2013
    • and 20 April 2013 with no restriction on language of publication
    • in Appendix 2. 1. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials
    • (CENTRAL), 2013 Issue 2, part of the Cochrane Library. 2. Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to Week 2 March 2013). 3. EMBASE (1980 to Week 12 2013) 4. PsycINFO (1967 to Week 3 March 2013). 5. CINAHL Plus (1937 to current). 6. ERIC (1966 to current). 7. Science Citation Index (1970 to 22 March 2013). 8. Social Sciences Citation Index (1970 to 22 March 2013). 9. Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (1990 to
    • 22 March 2013).
    • 10. Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Social Science &
    • Humanities (1990 to 22 March 2013).
    • 11. WorldCat (limited to theses) (worldcat.org/).
    • 12. International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (
    • 13. ClinicalTrials.gov (clinicaltrials.gov/).
    • 14. speechBITE (speechbite.com/).
    • 15. OpenGrey (opengrey.eu/).
    • 16. Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations
    • 17. Trove (National Library of Australia) (trove.nla.gov.au/).
    • 18. DART-Europe E-theses portal (DART) (dart-europe.eu/).
    • Doble 2006 {published data only} Doble MG. Development of Oral Communication in Infants with a Profound Hearing Loss: Pre- and Post-cochlear Implantation [PhD thesis]. University of Sydney, 2006.
    • Dornan 2007 {published data only} Dornan D, Hickson L, Murdoch B, Houston T. Outcomes of an auditory-verbal program for children with hearing loss: a comparative study with a matched group of children with normal hearing. The Volta Review 2007;107(1):37-54.
    • Dornan 2009 {published data only} Dornan D, Hickson L, Murdoch B, Houston T. Longitudinal study of speech perception, speech, and language for children with hearing loss in an auditory-verbal therapy program. The Volta Review 2009;109(2-3):61-85.
    • Dornan 2010 {published data only} Dornan D, Hickson L, Murdoch B, Houston T, Constantinescu G. Is auditory-verbal therapy effective for children with hearing loss?. The Volta Review 2010;110(3): 361-87.
    • Fairgray 2008 {published data only} Fairgray L, Purdy SC. Benefits of speech and language therapy for hearing impaired children. Poster Presented at Reflecting Connections: A Joint Conference Between New Zealand Speech Language Therapists Association and Speech Pathology Australia; 2008 May 25-29. 2008.
    • Fairgray 2010 {published data only} Fairgray L, Purdy SC, Smart JL. Effects of auditory-verbal therapy for school-aged children with hearing loss: an exploratory study. The Volta Review 2010;110(3):407-33.
    • Fulcher 2012 {published data only} Fulcher A, Purcell AA, Baker E, Munro N. Listen up: children with early identified hearing loss achieve ageappropriate speech/language outcomes by 3 years-of-age. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 2012; 76(12):1785-94.
    • Hogan 2008 {published data only} Hogan S, Stokes J, White C, Tyszkiewicz E, Woolgar A. An evaluation of auditory verbal therapy using the rate of early language development as an outcome measure. Deafness & Education International 2008;10(3):143-67.
    • Hogan 2010 {published data only} Hogan S, Stokes J, Weller I. Language outcomes for children of low-income families enrolled in auditory verbal therapy. Deafness & Education International 2010;12(4):204-16.
    • Sahli 2011 {published data only} Sahli AS, Belgin E. Researching auditory perception performances of children using cochlear Implants and being trained by an auditory verbal therapy. Journal of International Advanced Otology 2011;7(3):385-90.
    • Achenbach 1991 Achenbach TM. Manual for the Child Behaviour Checklist 4- 18 and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry, 1991.
    • AG Bell Academy 2011 AG Bell Academy. AG Bell Academy. Certification Handbook. Washington DC: AG Bell Academy for Listening and Spoken Language, 2011.
    • AG Bell Academy 2013 AG Bell Academy. AG Bell Academy for Listening and Spoken Language. www.listeningandspokenlanguage.org/ AGBellAcademy/ (accessed 17 October 2013).
    • Bamford 2007 Bamford J, Fortnum H, Bristow K, Smith J, Vamvakas G, Davies L, et al.Current practice, accuracy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the school entry hearing screen. Health Technology Assessment 2007;11(32):1-168.
    • Boucher-Jones 2001 Boucher-Jones M. Does the auditory-verbal approach differ from the auditory-oral approach and/or traditional aural habilitation?. In: Estabrooks W editor(s). Fifty FAQs about Auditory-Verbal Therapy. Toronto, Canada: Learning to Listen Foundation, 2001:17-9.
    • Brachmaier 2010 Brachmaier J, Schramm B. Parent observation: an effective assessment method for early speech and language development?. Cochlear Implants International 2010;11 (Suppl 1):259-63.
    • Brennan-Jones 2012 Brennan-Jones CG, White J, Rush RW, Law J. Auditoryverbal therapy for promoting spoken language development in children with permanent hearing impairments. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 9. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010100]
    • Davis 1992 Davis A, Wood S. The epidemiology of childhood hearing impairment: factors relevant to planning of services. British Journal of Audiology 1992;26(2):77-90.
    • Davis 1994 Davis A, Parving A. Towards appropriate epidemiology data on childhood hearing disability: a comparative European study of birth cohorts 1982-1988. Journal of Audiological Medicine 1994;3:35-47.
    • Davis 1997 Davis A, Bamford J, Wilson I, Ramkalawan T, Forshaw M, Wright S. A critical review of the role of neonatal hearing screening in the detection of congenital hearing impairment. Health Technology Assessment 1997;1(10):1-176.
    • Davis 2009 Davis A, Davis K, Mencher G. Epidemiology of permanent childhood hearing impairment. In: Newton VE editor(s). Paediatric Audiological Medicine. 2nd Edition. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2009:1-26.
    • Donner 2001 Donner AD, Piaggio G, Villar J. Statistical methods for meta-analysis of cluster randomization trials. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2001;10(5):325-38.
    • Edwards 2011 Edwards S, Letts C, Sinka I. The New Reynell Developmental Language Scales. London: GL-Assessment, 2011.
    • Eriks-Brophy 2004 Eriks-Brophy A. Outcomes of auditory-verbal therapy: a review of the evidence and a call for action. The Volta Review 2004;104(1):21-35.
    • Flexer 1999 Flexer C. Facilitating Hearing and Listening in Young Children. 2nd Edition. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, 1999.
    • Fortnum 1997 Fortnum H, Davis A. Epidemiology of permanent childhood hearing impairment in Trent Region, 1985- 1993. British Journal of Audiology 1997;31(6):409-46.
    • Fortnum 2001 Fortnum HM, Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH, Davis AC, Bamford JM. Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in the United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal hearing screening: questionnaire based ascertainment study. BMJ 2001;323(7312):536-40.
    • Gamble 2005 Gamble C, Hollis S. Uncertainty method improved on best-worst case analysis in a binary meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2005;58(6):579-88.
    • Hann 2001 Hann FL. Are there situations when auditory-verbal therapy is not appropriate for the family? How and when is it known that auditory-verbal therapy is working or not working?. In: Estabrooks W editor(s). Fifty FAQs about Auditory-Verbal Therapy. Toronto: Learning to Listen Foundation, 2001: 113-6.
    • Higgins 2002 Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21(11):1539-58.
    • Higgins 2008 Higgins JPT, White IR, Wood AM. Imputation methods for missing outcome data in meta-analysis of clinical trials. Clinical Trials 2008;5(3):225-39.
    • Higgins 2011 Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org.
    • Hróbjartsson 2012 Hróbjartsson A, Thomsen AS, Emanuelsson F, Tendal B, Hilden J, Boutron I, et al.Observer bias in randomised clinical trials with binary outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors. BMJ 2012;344:e1119.
    • Law 2010 Law J, Garrett Z, Nye C. Speech and language therapy interventions for children with primary speech and language delay or disorder. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 5. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004110]
    • Levasseur 2001 Levasseur J. What does an auditory-verbal therapist do that is different from what a speech-language pathologist does? . In: Estabrooks W editor(s). Fifty FAQs about AuditoryVerbal Therapy. Toronto: Learning to Listen Foundation, 2001:26-9.
    • Lim 2005 Lim SYC, Simser J. Auditory-verbal therapy for children with hearing impairment. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2005;34(4):307-12.
    • Martin 1981 Martin JAM, Bentzen O, Colley JRT, Hennebert D, Holm C, Iurato S, et al.Childhood deafness in the European community. Scandinavian Audiology 1981;10(3):165-74.
    • McDonald Walker 2001 McDonald Walker W. The therapist covers her mouth and sits across from the child. This is auditory-verbal therapy, right?. In: Estabrooks W editor(s). Fifty FAQs about Auditory-Verbal Therapy. Toronto: Learning to Listen Foundation, 2001:30-2.
    • Mitchell 2004 Mitchell RE, Karchmer MA. Chasing the mythical ten percent: parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies 2004;4 (2):138-63.
    • Morgan 2008 Morgan AT, Vogel AP. Intervention for childhood apraxia of speech. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006278.pub2]
    • Odgaard-Jensen 2011 Odgaard-Jensen J, Vist GE, Timmer A, Kunz R, Akl EA, Schünemann H, et al.Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858.MR000012.pub2]
    • Review Manager 2011 The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.1. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
    • Rhoades 2006 Rhoades EA. Research outcomes of auditory-verbal intervention: is the approach justified?. Deafness & Education International 2006;8(3):125-43.
    • Richards 2001 Richards L, Simser J. Don't children who are deaf or hard of hearing need lipreading to access and learn spoken language? . In: Estabrooks W editor(s). Fifty FAQs about AuditoryVerbal Therapy. Toronto: Learning to Listen Foundation, 2001:36-8.
    • Semel 2003 Semel E, Wiig EH, Secord WA. Clinical Evaluation of Language (CELF-4). 4th Edition. Toronto: The Psychological Corporation/A Harcourt Assessment Company, 2003.
    • Simser 2001 Simser J. Why do parents have to participate in the auditoryverbal session? Can't they watch through a one-way mirror? . In: Estabrooks W editor(s). Fifty FAQs about AuditoryVerbal Therapy. Toronto: Learning to Listen Foundation, 2001:82-5.
    • Stacey 2006 Stacey PC, Fortnum HM, Barton GR, Summerfield AQ. Hearing-impaired children in the United Kingdom I: auditory performance, communication skills, educational achievements, quality of life, and cochlear implantation. Ear and Hearing 2006;27(2):161-86.
    • Tomasello 2003 Tomasello M. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article