Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Gonçalves, L.S.; Rodrigues, R.C.V.; Andrade Junior, C.V.; Soares, R.G.; Vettore, M. (2016)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Introduction\ud \ud This systematic review aimed to compare the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine for root canal disinfection during root canal therapy.\ud \ud Methods\ud \ud A literature search for clinical trials was made on the PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Knowledge, SCOPUS, and Science Direct databases and in the reference lists of the identified articles up to January 2015. Quality assessment of the selected studies was performed according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement.\ud \ud Results\ud \ud One clinical trial and 4 randomized clinical trials were selected from the 172 articles initially identified. There was heterogeneity in the laboratory methods used to assess the root canal disinfection as well as in the concentrations of the irrigants used. Therefore, meta-analysis was not performed. Two studies reported effective and similar reductions in bacterial levels for both irrigants. Sodium hypochlorite was more effective than chlorhexidine in reducing microorganisms in 1 study, and another reported opposite findings. Both root irrigants were ineffective in eliminating endotoxins from necrotic pulp root canals in 1 study. Trial design and information regarding randomization procedures were not clearly described in the clinical trials. No study compared laboratory results with clinical outcomes.\ud \ud Conclusions\ud \ud The available evidence on this topic is scarce, and the findings of studies were not consistent. Additional randomized clinical trials using clinical outcomes to compare the use of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine during root canal therapy are needed.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Byström A, Happonen RP, Sjögren U, Sundqvist G. Healing of periapical lesions of pulpless teeth after endodontic treatment with controlled asepsis. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987;3: 58-65.
    • 2. Sjögren U, Figdor D, Persson S, Sundqvist G. Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997; 30:297 306.
    • 3. Regan JD, Fleury AA. Irrigants in non-surgical endodontic treatment. J Ir Dent Assoc. 2006 Autumn;52:84-92.
    • 4. Zehnder M. Root Canal Irrigants. J Endod 2006; 32:389-98.
    • 5. D'Arcangelo C, Varvara G, Fazio PD. An evaluation of the action of different root canal irrigants on facultative aerobic-anaerobic, obligate anaerobic, and microaerophilic bacteria. J Endod 1999; 25:351 3.
    • 6. Wong DTS, Cheung GSP. Extension of Bactericidal Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite into Dentinal Tubules. J Endod 2014; 40:825-9.
    • 7. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF Jr. Identification of bacteria enduring endodontic treatment procedures by a combined reverse transcriptasepolymerase chain reaction and reverse-capture checkerboard approach. J Endod 2010;36:45-52.
    • 8. Gordon TM, Damato D, Christner P. Solvent effect of various dilutions ofsodium hypochlorite on vital and necrotic tissue. J Endod 1981;7:466 9.
    • 15. Siqueira JF Jr, Batista MM, Fraga RC, de Uzeda M. Antibacterial effects of endodontic irrigants on black-pigmented gram-negative anaerobes and facultative bacteria. J Endod 1998;24:414-6.
    • 39. Rodrigues RC, Antunes HS, Neves MA, Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN. Infection control in retreatment cases: in vivo antibacterial effects of two instrumentation systems. J Endod 2015;41:1600-05.
    • 40. Vera J, Siqueira JF Jr, Ricucci D, Loghin S, Fernandez N, Flores B, Cruz AG. One versus two-visit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a histobacteriologic study. J Endod 2012;38:1040-52.
    • 41. Ricucci D, Loghin S, Siqueira JF Jr. Exuberant biofilm infection in a lateral canal as the cause of short-term endodontic treatment failure: reporto f a case. J Endod 2013;39:712-18.
    • 42. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN. Polymerase chain reaction-based analysis of microorganisms associated with failed endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 97: 85 94.
    • 43. Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer HH. How useful is root canal culturing in predicting treatment outcome? J Endod 2007; 33: 220 225.
    • 44. Alves FR, Siqueira JF Jr, Carmo FL, Santos AL, Peixoto RS, Rôças IN, Rosado AS. Bacterial community profiling of cryogenically ground samples from the apical and coronal root segments of teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 2009; 35: 486-92.
    • 45. Fedorowicz Z, Nasser M, Sequeira-Byron P, de Souza RF, Carter B, Heft M. Irrigants for non-surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;9:1-55.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article