LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Sinde, Hamis Mohamed
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: N400
This study focuses on analysing the financial sustainability of local government authorities (LGAs) in Tanzania with reference to decentralisation. In this context, the financial sustainability of LGAs is considered as an important aspect for decentralisation to succeed, especially in enhancing horizontal equity and public services in general. Specifically, the study attempts to: (i) assess and explain variations in financial sustainability across LGAs (ii) explore consequences of financial difficulties whenever they arise in the course of budget execution, and ways used to mitigate the difficulties. The study uses a quantitative approach, whereby financial indicators are used to analyse LGAs’ financial performance reports to achieve the first objective, and qualitative analysis of interview data from three case studies to achieve the second objective.\ud The empirical findings suggest decentralisation in Tanzania influences financial sustainability of LGAs in different ways. First, councils with a large proportion of poor people not only have low financial sustainability, low expenditure per person and low own source revenue per person but also receive a lower average grant per person. This poses the danger of exaggerating the horizontal gap in service access. Secondly, council size and population size contribute negatively while the flow of government grants and poor financial management practices contribute positively to variations in financial sustainability. Thirdly, the findings suggest decentralisation may not discourage complacency in LGAs’ revenue mobilisation and financial management practices. On the other hand, observation from the case studies suggests financial difficulties are prevalent in LGAs. They adversely affect LGAs’ operations, especially in executing development projects in priority sectors: health, education, water and agriculture. To mitigate the difficulties, LGAs involve people in service provision, cuts or postponing activities as immediate options, and seeking alternative revenues sources for the long term.\ud The study offers three main contributions. First, it bridges two interrelated but distinct research themes: financial sustainability and fiscal decentralisation studies. This broadens the scope of analysing both themes. Secondly, it offers insights into why decentralisation may or may not achieve its potential. This is in response to the observation from some studies, which report the outcome of decentralisation in developing countries to be limited. Lastly, it offers feedback on the way decentralisation is executed in a country that has long-standing initiatives on enhancing horizontal equity and improving provision of public services in general.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Whitaker, G.P. (1985). “Book Review- City Money: Political Processes, Fiscal Strain, and Retrenchment- by Clark, T. N and Ferguson, L. C”, American Journal of Sociology, 90 (5) 1107-1110.
    • Whitehead, M. (1985). “The Concepts and Principles of Equity and Health”, World Health Organisation -Regional office for Europe, Copenhagen.
    • Widmalm, S. (2008). “Decentralisation, Corruption and Social Capital: From India to the West”, SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd, India.
    • Wollmann, H. (2008). “Comparing Local Government Reforms in England, Sweden, France and Germany”, Available at: www.wuestenrot-stiftung.de/download/localgovernment.
    • Work, R. (2002). “Overview of Decentralisation Worldwide: A Stepping Stone to Improved Governance and Human Development”. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Decentralisation, 'Federalism: The Future of Decentralising States?', Organised by the UNDP, Manila, Philippines, 25-27 July.
    • World Bank (2010). “A Framework for the Assessment of Fiscal Decentralisation System”, World Bank Publications, Washington, D.C.
    • World Bank (2013). “Implementation, Completion and Result Report on a Credit to the United Republic of Tanzania for a Local Government Support Project”, Washington DC, World Bank.
    • Xie, D., Zou, H. F., and Davoodi, H. (1999). “Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth in the United States”. Journal of Urban Economics, 45(2), 228-239.
    • Yilmaz, S., Vaillancourt, F., and Melloche, J. (2004). “Decentralisation or Fiscal Autonomy? What Does Really Matter? Effect of Size and Public Sector Size in European Transition countries”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3254.
    • Yin, R. K. (2009). “Case Study Research: Design and Methods”, 4th ed. London: SAGE Publications Inc.
    • Zafra-Gómez, J. L., Antonio, M., and Pérez, M. (2010). “Overcoming cost-inefficiencies within small municipalities: improve financial condition or reduce the quality of public services?”. Environment and planning. C, Government & policy, 28(4), 609.
    • Zafra-Gómez, J. L., López-Hernández, A. M., and Hernández-Bastida, A. (2009a).
    • “Developing an Alert System for Local Governments in Financial Crisis”. Public Money & Management, 29(3), 175-181.
    • Zafra-Gómez, J. L., López-Hernández, A. M., and Hernández-Bastida, A. (2009b).
    • “Developing a Model to Measure Financial Condition in Local Government Evaluating Service Quality and Minimizing the Effects of the Socioeconomic Environment: An Application to Spanish municipalities”. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(4), 425-449.
    • Zhang, T. and Zou, H. F. (2001). “The growth impact of Intersectoral and Intergovernmental Allocation of Public expenditure: With applications to China and India”. China Economic Review, 12(1), 58-81.
    • Zhang, T., and Zou, H. F. (1998). “Fiscal Decentralisation, Public Spending, and Economic Growth in China”. Journal of public economics, 67(2), 221-240.
    • Zhao, Z. J. (2009). “Fiscal Decentralisation and Provincial‐ Level Fiscal Disparities in China: A Sino‐ US Comparative Perspective”. Public Administration Review, 69(s1), S67-S74.
    • 1. Ratio A = (Cash and Cash Equivalent + Short-term Investment) / Current Liabilities 2. Ratio B = (Cash and Cash Equivalent + Short-term Investment + Account Receivables) / Current Liabilities 3. Ratio C = Currents Assets / Current Liabilities.
    • 1. Ratio A = (Total Revenues - Special Allocation Fund Revenue) / (Total Expenditures - Capital Expenditure), 2. Ratio B = (Total Revenues - Special Allocation Fund Revenue) / Operational Expenditure, 3. Ratio C = (Total Revenues - Special Allocation Fund Revenue) / Employee Expenditure, 4. Ratio D = Total Revenue / Total Expenditure 1. Ratio A = Long Term Liabilities / Total Assets, 2. Ratio B = Long Term Liabilities / Investment Equities, 3. Ratio C = Investment Equities / Total Assets 1. Ratio A = Total Equities / Population, 2. Ratio B = Total Assets / Population, 3. Ratio C = Total Expenditures / Population 1. Ratio A = (Total Revenues - Special Allocation Fund Revenue - Employee Expenditures) / (Repayments of Loan Principal + Interest Expenditures), 2. Ratio B = (Total Revenues - Special Allocation Fund Revenue - Employee Expenditures) / Total Liabilities, 3. Ratio C = (Total Revenues - Special Allocation Fund Revenue - Employee Expenditures) / Long Term Liabilities, 4. Ratio D = (Total Revenues - Special Allocation Fund Revenue) / Total Liabilities.
    • 1. Ratio A = Total Own Revenues / Total Revenues, 2. Ratio B = Total Own Revenues / Total Expenditures (Amount of Own Fund/ Amount of Total Receipts) x 100
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article