LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Weishaar, Heide; Dorfman, Lori; Freudenberg, Nicholas; Hawkins, Benjamin; Smith, Katherine; Razum, Oliver; Hilton, Shona (2016)
Publisher: Springer Nature
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Research Article, Framing, RA1-1270, Public aspects of medicine, Non-communicable diseases, Media analysis, Corporations, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
ddc: ddc:610
Background:\ud Media representations play a crucial role in informing public and policy opinions about the causes of, and solutions to, ill-health. This paper reviews studies analysing media coverage of non-communicable disease (NCD) debates, focusing on how the industries marketing commodities that increase NCD risk are represented.\ud \ud Methods:\ud A scoping review identified 61 studies providing information on media representations of NCD risks, NCD policies and tobacco, alcohol, processed food and soft drinks industries. The data were narratively synthesized to describe the sample, media depictions of industries, and corporate and public health attempts to frame the media debates.\ud \ud Results:\ud The findings indicate that: (i) the limited research that has been undertaken is dominated by a focus on tobacco; (ii) comparative research across industries/risk-factors is particularly lacking; and (iii) coverage tends to be dominated by two contrasting frames and focuses either on individual responsibilities (‘market justice’ frames, often promoted by commercial stakeholders) or on the need for population-level interventions (‘social justice’ frames, frequently advanced by public health advocates).\ud \ud Conclusions:\ud Establishing the underlying frameworks is crucial for the analysis of media representation of corporations, as they reflect the strategies that respective actors use to influence public health debates and decision making. The potential utility of media research lies in the insights that it can provide for public health policy advocates about successful framing of public health messages and strategies to counter frames that undermine public health goals. A better understanding of current media debates is of paramount importance to improving global health.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Otten AL. The influence of the mass media on health policy. Health Aff. 1992;11(4):111-8.
    • 2. Dorfman L, Cheyne A, Friedman LC, Wadud A, Gottlieb M. Soda and tobacco industry corporate social responsibility campaigns: How do they compare? PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):e1001241.
    • 3. Entman RM. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun. 1993;43(4):51-8.
    • 4. Lippmann W: Public Opinion. New York. The Free Press; 1965 [1922].
    • 5. Hilton S, Patterson C, Teyhan A. Escalating coverage of obesity in UK newspapers: the evolution and framing of the “obesity epidemic” from 1996 to 2010. Obesity. 2012;20(8):1688-95.
    • 6. Kitzinger J. Framing abuse: media influence and public understanding of sexual violence against children. London: Pluto Press; 2004.
    • 7. Casswell S. Vested interests in addiction research and policy. Why do we not see the corporate interests of the alcohol industry as clearly as we see those of the tobacco industry? Addiction. 2013;108(4):680-5.
    • 8. Gorini G, Currie L, Spizzichino L, Galeone D, Lopez MJ. Smoke-free policy development in Italy through the legislative process of the ban 2000-2005, and press media review 1998-2008. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2011;47:260-5.
    • 9. Hilton S, Hunt K, Langan M, Bedford H, Petticrew M. Newsprint media representations of the introduction of the HPV vaccination programme for cervical cancer prevention in the UK (2005-2008). Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(6):942-50.
    • 10. Myhre SL, Saphir MN, Flora JA, Howard KA, Gonzalez EM. Alcohol coverage in California newspapers: frequency, prominence, and framing. J Public Health Policy. 2002;23(2):172-90.
    • 11. Christofides N, Chapman S, Dominello A. The new pariahs: discourse on the tobacco industry in the Sydney press, 1993-97. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999;23(3):233-9.
    • 12. Schneider A, Ingram H. Social construction of target populations: implications for policy and practice. Am Polit Sci Rev. 1993;87(2):334-47.
    • 13. GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. The Lancet . 2015;385(9963):117-71.
    • 14. Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of NCDs 2013-2020 [http://www.who.int/nmh/events/ncd_action_plan/en/]. Accessed 26 Aug 2016.
    • 15. Political declaration of the High-level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases. A/66/L.1. 16 September 2011 [http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/66/L.1]. Accessed 26 Aug 2016.
    • 16. Freudenberg N, Galea S. The impact of corporate practices on health: implications for health policy. J Public Health Policy. 2008;26:86-102.
    • 17. Freudenberg N. Public health advocacy to change corporate practices: implications for health education practice and research. Health Educ Behav. 2005;32:298-39.
    • 18. Freudenberg N. Lethal but legal. Corporations, consumption and protecting public health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.
    • 19. Jahiel RI, Barbor TF. Industrial epidemics, public health advocacy and the alcohol industry: lessons from other fields. Addiction. 2007;102:1335-9.
    • 20. World Health Organization Committee of Experts on Tobacco Industry Documents. Tobacco company strategies to undermine tobacco control activities at the world health organization. San Francisco: University of California; 2000.
    • 21. Stuckler D, McKee M, Ebrahim S, Basu S. Manufacturing epidemics: the role of global producers in increased consumption of unhealthy commodities including processed foods, alcohol, and tobacco. PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):e1001235.
    • 22. Jernigan DH. The global alcohol industry: an overview. Addiction. 2009;104:6-12.
    • 23. Nestle M. Food politics: How the food industry influences nutrition and health. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2002.
    • 24. Nestle M. Soda politics. Taking on big soda (and winning). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
    • 25. Brownell K, Warner KE. The perils of ignoring history: Big tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is big food? Milbank Q. 2009;87(1):259-94.
    • 26. Penders B, Nelis AP. Credibility engineering in the food industry: linking science, regulation, and marketing in a corporate context. Sci Context. 2011;24(04):487-515.
    • 27. Baron DP. Integrated strategy: market and nonmarket components. Calif Manag Rev. 1995;95(2):47.
    • 28. Moodie R, Stuckler D, Monteiro C, Sheron N, Neal B, Thamarangsi T, Lincoln P, Casswell S, on behalf of The Lancet NCD Action Group. Profits and pandemics: prevention of harmful effects of tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food and drink industries. Lancet. 2013;381:670-9.
    • 29. Daube M. Alcohol and tobacco. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012;36(2):108-10.
    • 30. White J, Bero L. Corporate manipulation of research: strategies are similar across five industries. Stranford Law Policy Rev. 2011;21:105-34.
    • 31. Wiist W. The corporate play book, health, and democracy: the snack food and beverage industry's tactics in context. In: Stuckler D, Siegel K, editors. Sick societies: responding tothe global challenge of chronic disease. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
    • 32. Hawkins B, Holden C. 'Water dripping on stone'? industry lobbying and UK alcohol policy. Policy Polit. 2014;42(1):55-70.
    • 33. van Hulst MJ, Yanow D. From Policy “Frames” to “Framing”. Am Rev Public Adm. 2014.
    • 34. Dorfman L, Wallack L, Woodruff K. More than a message: framing public health advocacy to change corporate practices. Health Educ Behav. 2005;32(3):320-36.
    • 35. Weiss JA. The powers of problem definition: the case of government paper-work. Policy Sci. 1989;22(2):97-121.
    • 36. Riker WH. The Art of political manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1986.
    • 37. Beauchamp DE. Public health as social justice. Inquiry. 1976;13:3-14.
    • 38. Katikireddi SV, Hilton S. How did policy actors use mass media to influence the Scottish alcohol minimum unit pricing debate? comparative analysis of newspapers, evidence submissions and interviews. Drugs. 2015;22(2):125-34.
    • 39. Friedman LC, Cheyne A, Givelber D, Gottlieb MA, Daynard RA. Tobacco industry use of personal responsibility rhetoric in public relations and litigation: disguising freedom to blame as freedom of choice. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(2):250-60.
    • 40. Harwood EM, Witson JC, Fan DP, Wagenaar AC. Media advocacy and underage drinking policies: a study of Louisiana news media from 1994 through 2003. Health Promot Pract. 2005;6(3):246-57.
    • 41. McLeod K, Wakefield M, Chapman S, Smith KC, Durkin S. Changes in the news representation of smokers and tobacco-related media advocacy from 1995 to 2005 in Australia. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009;63(3):215-20.
    • 42. Smith KC, Wakefield M, Edsall E. The good news about smoking: How do US newspapers cover tobacco issues? J Public Health Policy. 2006;27(2):166-81.
    • 43. Wakefield M, Clegg Smith K, Chapman S. Framing of Australian newspaper coverage of a secondhand smoke injury claim: lessons for media advocacy. Crit Public Health. 2005;15(1):53-63.
    • 44. Jeong M, Gilmore JS, Bleakley A, Jordan A. Local news media framing of obesity in the context of a sugar-sweetened beverage reduction media campaign. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014;46(6):583-8.
    • 45. Kennedy G, Bero L. Print media coverage of research on passive smoking. Tob Control. 1999;8(3):254-60.
    • 46. Hellman M, Karlsson T. In fear of a reversal back to the spirits-drinking era - the 2004 decrease of Finnish alcohol taxes in public discourse. Nord Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012;29(1):57-77.
    • 47. Katikireddi SV, Bond L, Hilton S. Changing policy framing as a deliberate strategy for public health advocacy: a qualitative policy case study of minimum unit pricing of alcohol. Milbank Q. 2014;92(2):250-83.
    • 48. Hawkins B, Holden C. Framing the alcohol policy debate: industry actors and the regulation of the UK beverage alcohol market. Crit Policy Stud. 2013;7(1):53-71.
    • 49. McCambridge J, Hawkins B, Holden C. Industry use of evidence to influence alcohol policy: a case study of submissions to the 2008 Scottish government consultation. PLoS Med. 2013;10(4):e1001431.
    • 50. Holden C, Hawkins B. 'Whisky gloss': the alcohol industry, devolution and policy communities in Scotland. Public Policy Adm. 2013;28(3):253-73.
    • 51. Yoon S, Lam TH. The illusion of righteousness: corporate social responsibility practices of the alcohol industry. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:11.
    • 52. Nixon L, Mejia P, Cheyne A, Dorfman L. Big soda's long shadow: news coverage of local proposals to tax sugar-sweetened beverages in Richmond, El monte and telluride. Crit Public Health. 2015;25(3):333-47.
    • 53. Nixon L, Mejia P, Cheyne A, Wilking C, Dorfman L, Daynard R. “We're part of the solution”: evolution of the food and beverage industry's framing of obesity concerns between 2000 and 2012. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(11):2228-36.
    • 54. Smith KC, Wakefield M. Textual analysis of tobacco editorials: How are key media gatekeepers framing the issues? Am J Health Promot. 2005;19(5):361-8.
    • 55. Wakefield M, Mcleod K, Smith KC. Individual versus corporate responsibility for smoking-related illness: Australian press coverage of the rolah McCabe trial. Health Promot Int. 2003;18(4):297-305.
    • 56. Lawrence R. Framing obesity: the evolution of news discourse on a public health issue. Int J Press/Politics. 2004;9(3):56-75.
    • 57. Donaldson EA, Cohen JE, Truant PL, Rutkow L, Kanarek NF, Barry CL. News media framing of New York City's sugar-sweetened beverage portion-size cap. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(11):2202-9.
    • 58. Chapman S. Public health advocacy and tobacco control. Making smoking history. Oxford: Blackwell; 2007.
    • 59. Chapman S, Lupton D. Fight for public health: principles & practice of media advocacy. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 1994.
    • 60. Smith A. The wealth of nations. New York: Modern Library; 2000 [1776].
    • 61. Block, amend, delay: tobacco industry efforts to influence the European Union's Tobacco Products Directive (2001/37/EC) [http://www.smokefreepartnership.eu/ reports/item/block-amend-delay]. Accessed 26 Aug 2016.
    • 62. Tobacco Industry Interference with Tobacco Control [http://www.who.int/ tobacco/resources/publications/tob_ind_int_cover_150/en/index.html]. Accessed 26 Aug 2016.
    • 63. Fooks GJ, Gilmore AB, Smith KE, Collin J, Holden C, Lee K. Corporate Social Responsibility and Access to Policy Élites: An Analysis of Tobacco Industry Documents. PLoS Med. 2011;8(8):e1001076. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed. 1001076. The article can be found at: http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001076.
    • 64. Currie LM, Clancy L. The road to smoke-free legislation in Ireland. Addiction. 2011;106(1):15-24.
    • 65. Arnott D, Dockrell M, Sandford A, Wilmore I. Comprehensive smokefree legislation in England: how advocacy won the day. Tob Control. 2007;16:423-8.
    • 66. Weishaar H, Amos A, Collin J. Best of enemies: using social network analysis to explore a policy network in European smoke-free policy. Soc Sci Med. 2015;133:85-92.
    • 67. Wolfson M: The Fight Against Big Tobacco: The Movement, the State, and the Public's Health. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers; 2001.
    • 68. Nixon L, Mejia P, Somji A, Arbatman L, Aziz A, Seklir L, Dorfman L: Big Soda Battles: An analysis of news coverage, social media, and campaign materials from the Berkeley and San Francisco soda tax campaigns. submitted for review to the American Journal of Public Health in March 2016 under review.
    • 69. Public Health Responsibility Deal [https://responsibilitydeal.dh.gov.uk/]. Accessed 26 Aug 2016.
    • 70. Huang TT, Yaroch AL: A public-private partnership model for obesity prevention [letter to the editor]. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009; 6(3):A110.
    • 71. Dorfman L, Cheyne A, Gottlieb MA, Mejia P, Nixon L, Friedman LC, Daynard RA. Cigarettes become a dangerous product: tobacco in the rearview mirror, 1952-1965. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(1):37-46.
    • 72. Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. London: Routledge; 2013.
    • 73. Fairclough N, Mulderrig J, Wodak R. Critical discourse analysis. In: van Dijk TA, editor. Discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction. London: Sage; 2011. p. 357-78.
    • 74. Berger AA. Media analysis techniques. California: Sage; 1988.
    • 75. Liang Y, Zheng X, Zeng DD, Zhou X, Leischow SJ, Chung W. Exploring How the tobacco industry presents and promotes itself in social media. JMIR Publ. 2015;17(1):e24.
    • 76. Dorfman L. Studying the news on public health: how content analysis supports media advocacy. Am J Health Behav. 2003;27(Supplement 3):S217-226.
    • 77. Richardson JE. Analysing newspapers. An approach from critical discourse analysis. Melbourne: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006.
    • 78. Franklin B. Pulling newspapers apart. Analysing print journalism. Oxford: Routledge; 2009.
    • 79. Witschge T, Nygren G. Journalistic work: a profession under pressure? J Media Bus Stud. 2009;6(1):37-59.
    • 80 Lewis J, Williams A, Franklin B. A compromised fourth estate? Journal Stud. 2008;9(1):1-20.
    • 81 Weishaar H, Amos A, Collin J. Capturing complexity: mixing methods in the analysis of a European tobacco control policy network. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2015;18(2):175-92.
    • 82 Gostin LO, Powers M. What does social justice require for the public's health? public health ethics and policy imperatives. Health Aff. 2006;25(4):1053-60.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

Cite this article