LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Jamson, SL; Benetou, D; Tate, F (2015)
Publisher: Aracne
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
A high percentage of serious accidents occur on sharp horizontal curves, especially on two-lane rural roads. A growing body of literature has examined driving behaviour on horizontal curves, with most research relating the effect of curve radius on driver’s speed and steering behaviour. There is an agreement that increasing degrees of road curvature result in less safe curve negotiation performance and consequently more accidents. Few studies, however, have further explored the effect of limited visibility on curve negotiation. This paper reports the results of a driving simulator study aimed at examining drivers’ behaviour on horizontal curves, in terms of speed and lateral position, in relation to varying levels of visibility of the curve’s arc. A two-lane rural road was designed and implemented in a desktop driving simulator and ten curve scenarios were examined with five different levels of visibility (20%, 40%, 60%, 80% and 100%), and of two curve radii (150m and 250m). Thirty drivers participated in the experiment; statistical analysis showed there to be a clear effect of radius on driver speed, as would be expected. However, when visibility decreased, reductions in driver speed were only found at the lowest level (20% preview). This speed reduction, however, was not sufficient enough for drivers to be able to negotiate the curve without detriment to their lateral positioning. Drivers tended to decelerate later and more sharply in the poor visibility curve and then have to compensate by moving towards the centre-line in order to flatten out the curve. It is concluded that whilst drivers can adapt sufficiently on curves that have moderate pre-view, when visibility deteriorates below a threshold (in this case 20% preview) drivers are unable (or willing) to reduce their speed appropriately and thus risk lane excursion.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Agent, K.R. (1980). Transverse pavement markings for speed control and accident reduction. Transportation Research Record, 773 (1980), pp. 11-14.
    • 2. Bella, F. (2009). Can the driving simulators contribute to solving the critical issues in geometric design? Transportation Research Record No. 2138. TRB of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 120-126.
    • 3. Bella, F. (2011). How traffic conditions affect driver behavior in passing maneuver. Advances in Transportation Studies RSS2011 Special Issue, pp 113-126.
    • 4. Bella, F. (2013). Driver perception of roadside configuration on two-lane rural roads: Effects on speed and lateral placement. Accident Analysis and Prevention 50 (2013), pp. 251-262.
    • 5. Blaauw, G.J. (1982). Driving experience and task demands in simulator and instrumented car: a validation study. Human Factors 24(4), pp 473-486.
    • 6. Bonneson, J.A., Pratt, M. Miles, J. and Carlson P. (2007). Development of Guidelines for Establishing Effective Curve Advisory Speeds. FHWA/TX-07/0-5439-1. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas.
    • 7. Calvi A (2015). A Study on Driving Performance Along Horizontal Curves of Rural Roads. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, Vol. 7(3), p. 243-267.
    • 8. Cenek, P. D. et al. (2011). A prioritisation scheme for the safety management of curves. Proceedings of 3rd International Surface Friction Conference, Safer Road Surfaces - Saving Lives, Gold Coast, Australia 2011.
    • 9. Charlton, S. G. and de Pont, J. J. (2007). Curve speed management. Land Transport New Zealand: Research Report 323.
    • 10. Chen, S. H. (2010). Mining patterns and factors contributing to crash severity on road curves. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology.
    • 11. Chrysler et al. (2009). Driver Response to Delineation Treatments on Horizontal Curves on Two-Lane Roads. Texas Transportation Institute, Report No. FHWA/TX-09/0-5772-1.
    • 12. Comte, S. L. and Jamson, A. H. (2000). Traditional and innovative speed-reducing measures for curves: an investigation of driver behaviour using a driving simulator. Safety Science 36 (2000), pp. 137-150.
    • 13. Duncan, B. (1995). Calibration trials of TRL driving simulator. Transport Research Laboratory. Unpublished Project report. PA13079195. S221AlRB.
    • 14. FHWA, (2007). Mitigation Strategies for Design Exceptions - July 2007. Available from: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
    • 15. Fitzpatrick, K. et al. (2000) Alternative Design Consistency Rating Methods for Two-Lane Rural Highways. Federal Highway Administration. Report 99-172.
    • 16. Gawron, V.J. and Ranney, T.A. (1990). Curve negotiation performance in a driving simulator as a function of curve geometry. Applied Ergonomics 21, pp. 33-38.
    • 17. Glennon, J.C., T.R. Neuman, and J.E. Leisch. Safety and Operational Considerations for Design of Rural Highway Curves. FHWA/RD-86/035. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. 1985.
    • 18. Groeger, J.A., Carsten, O.M.J., Blana, E., Jamson, A.H., 1997. Speed and distance estimation under simulated conditions. In Gale, A.G., Brown, I.D., Haslegrave, C.M. and Taylor, S.P. (Eds.): Vision in Vehicles VII. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
    • 19. Hallmark, S. L. (2012). Relationship between Speed and Lateral Position on Curves. Center for Transportation Research and Education Iowa State University. Final report, part of the Midwest Transportation Consortium Project 2009-03.
    • 20. Harms, L. (1993). Driving Performance on a real road and in a driving simulator: results of a validation study. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Vision in Vehicles, Glasgow.
    • 21. Harms, L., Alm., H. and Tornos, J. (1996). The influence of situation cues on simulated driving behaviour: a summary of three validation studies. Paper presented at the Symposium on the Design and Validation of Driving Simulators. ICCTP'96. Valencia.
    • 22. Howarth, P.A.,1998. Oculomotor changes within virtual environments. Applied Ergonomics, 30, 59-67.
    • 23. Hu, W. and Donell, E. T. (2010). Models of acceleration and deceleration rates on a complex two-lane rural highway: Results from a nighttime driving experiment. Transportation Research Part F 13 (2010), pp. 397-408.
    • 24. Jamson SL; Jamson AH (2010). The validity of a low-cost simulator for the assessment of the effects of in-vehicle information systems, Safety Science, 48, pp.1477-1483.
    • 25. Kallberg, V. (1993). Reflector posts: signs of danger? Transportation research record. No. 1403.
    • 26. McFadden, J. and Elefteriadou, L. (2000). Evaluating Horizontal Alignment Design Consistency of Two-Lane Rural Highways - Development of new procedure. Transportation Research Record 1737, Paper No. 00-0813.
    • 27. McLean, J.R. (1974). Driver behaviour on curves - a review. Proceedings of the 7th Australian Road Research Board (ARRB) Conference, Adelaide (1974), pp.129-147
    • 28. NHTSA, (2011). Traffic Safety Facts 2011 - A Compilation of Motor Vehicle Crash Data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and the General Estimates System. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Center for Statistics and Analysis, U.S. Department of Transportation Washington, DC 20590.
    • 29. Porter, R. J. et al. (2004). Evaluation of Effects of Centerline Rumble Strips on Lateral Vehicle Placement and Speed. Transportation Research Record: No. 1862, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp.10-16.
    • 30. Profilidis and Botzoris, (2005). Analysis and Modeling of Road Safety Parameters. (Original title in Greek: ). 3 , , 10-11 ., 2005
    • 31. Said, D. Abd El Halim, O. and Hassan, Y. (2009). Methodology for Driver Behaviour Data Collection and Analysis for Integration in Geometric Design of Highways. Proceedings 4th International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design.
    • 32. Shinar, D. (1977). Curve Perception and Accidents on Curves: an illusive Curve Phenomenon? Zeitschrift fur Verkehrssicherheit, Vol. 23, 16-21.
    • 33. Shinar, D. et al (1980). The effects of changes in driver perception on rural curve negotiation. Ergonomics 23, pp.263-275.
    • 34. Symmons, M. et al. (2004). Rural Road Safety - Overview Of Crash Statistics. Monash University Accident Research Centre: Report No. 212.
    • 35. Taragin, A. and Leisch, L.E., (1954). Driver performance on horizontal curves. Highway Research Board Proceedings 33 (1954), pp.446-466.
    • 36. Tenkink, E. (1990). Effects of road width and a secondary task on speed and lateral control in car driving (in Dutch). Report IZF 1990 C-27. TNO Institute for Perception. Soesterberg. The Netherlands.
    • 37. Tenkink, E. and Van Der Horst, A.R.A. (1991). Effects of road width and curve characteristics on driving speed (in Dutch). Report IZF 1991 C-26. TNO Institute for Perception. Soesterberg. The Netherlands.
    • 38. Turner, S. and Tate, F. (2009). Relationship between Road Geometry, Observed Travel Speed and Rural Accidents. New Zealand Transport Agency, Research Report 371.
    • 39. van der Horst, R. and de Ridder, S. Influence of Roadside Infrastructure on Driving Behavior: Driving Simulator Study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2018, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 36-44.
    • 40. Vest, A. and Stamatiadis, N. (2005), “Use Of Warning Signs and Markings to Reduce Speeds on Curves”. The 3rd International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design, Chicago Illinois, United States. http://pubsindex.trb.org/document/view/default.asp?lbid=760638
    • 41. Wochinger, K. and Pecheux, K. (2001). Driver Perception of Horizontal Curves on a Simulated Two-Lane Rural Highway. Proceedings of the 1st Human-Centered Transportation Simulation Conference, The University of Iowa City, Iowa, November 4-7, 2001.
    • 42. Zador, P., H. Stein, P. Wright, and J. Hall. Effects of Chevrons, Post-Mounted Delineators, and Raised Pavement Markers on Driver Behavior at Roadway Curves. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1114, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987, pp. 1-10.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article