Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Pluck, G.; Johnson, H. L. (2011)
Publisher: Georgian Technical University
Languages: English
Types: Article

Classified by OpenAIRE into

Curiosity is an aspect of intrinsic motivation that has great potential to enhance student learning. Theory and evidence describing curiosity are discussed, focusing on psychological and pedagogical literature relating to adult education. In particular, the concept of ‘information gaps’ as a source of academic curiosity is explored. In addition, the concept of curiosity in two disparate sample disciplines; second language learning and medical education are considered. The role of inquiry based learning approaches are also discussed as potential modes of stimulating student curiosity, as well as simple classroom techniques, which could be applied to almost any academic discipline and based on the theories should act to enhance student curiosity.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Friedman TL. The World is flat: A brief history of the 21st century. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux; 2007.
    • 2. Pink D. Tom Friedman on education in the 'flat world'. The School Administrator. 2008;65(2):4-8.
    • 3. James W. The Principles of psychology. New York: Dover; 1890.
    • 4. Gorlitz D. Exploration and attribution. In: Gorlitz D, Wohlwill JF, editors. Curiosity, imagination, and play: on the development of spontaneous cognitive and motivational processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1987.
    • 5. Henderson BB. Social support and exploration. Child Development. 1984;55:1246-51.
    • 6. Vygotsky LS. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA. : Harvard University Press; 1978.
    • 7. Skinner BF. The behavior of organisms: an experimental analysis. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts; 1938.
    • 8. Skinner BF. The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1968.
    • 9. Hull C. Principles of behavior. New York: Apple-Century-Crofts; 1943.
    • 10. Birke LIA, Archer J. Some issues and problems in the study of animal exploration. Exploration in animals and humans. Wokingham: Van Nostrand Reinhold (UK); 1983. p. 1-21.
    • 11. Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM, Przybeck TR. A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1993;50:975-90.
    • 12. Naylor FD. A state-trait curiosity inventory. Australian Psychologist. 1981;16:172-83.
    • 13. Coie JD. An evaluation of the cross situational stability of children's curiosity. Journal of Personality. 1974;42:93-116.
    • 14. Neisser U. Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. New York: W H Freeman & Co; 1976.
    • 15. Berlyne DE. A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology. 1954;45:180-91.
    • 16. Berlyne DE. Conclift, arousal and curiosity. London: McGraw-Hill; 1960.
    • 17. Loewenstein G. The psychology of curiosity: a review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin. 1994;116(1):75-98.
    • 18. Koffka K. Principles of gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt-Brace; 1935.
    • 19. Schmitt FF, Lahroodi R. The epistemic value of curiosity. Educational Theory. 2008;8:125-48.
    • 20. Day HY. The role of specific curiosity in school acheivment. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1968;59:37-43.
    • 21. Gentry JW, Burns AC, Dickinson JR, Putrevu S, Chu S, Hongyan Y, et al. Managing the curiosity gap does matter: What do we need to do about it? Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning. 2002;26:67-73.
    • 22. Rossing BE, Long HB. Contributions of curiosity and relevance to adult learning motivation. Adult Education Quarterly. 1981;32:25-36.
    • 23. Litman JA, Hutchins TL, Russon RK. Epistemic curiosity, feeling-of-knowing, and exploratory behaviour. Cognition and Emotion. 2005;19.
    • 24. Marton F, Saljo R. On qualitative differences in learning I. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1976;46:4-11.
    • 25. Craik F, Lockhart R. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1972;11:671-84.
    • 26. Brew A. Teaching and Research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development. 2003;22:3-18.
    • 27. Zion M, Sadeh I. Curiosity and open inquiry learning. Journal of Biological Education. 2007;41:162-8.
    • 28. Ur P. A course in language teaching: theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
    • 29. Willis D. The lexical syIlabus: A new approach to language teaching. London: Collins E.L.T.; 1990.
    • 30. Stover D. Problem-Based Learning: Redefining self-directed instruction and learning. The Forum: Sharing Information on Learning and Teaching. 1998;7:9-10.
    • 31. Richardson P. Clinical competence and curiosity. British Medical Journal. 1986;292:1481-2.
    • 32. Mann KV. Motivation in medical education: How theory can inform our practice. Academic Medicine. 1999;74:237-9.
    • 33. Kedge S, Appleby B. Promoting curiosity through the enhancement of competence. British Journal of Nursing. 2010;19:584-7.
    • 34. Strayhorn J. Aspects of motivation in preclinical medical training: A student's viewpoint. Journal of Medical Education. 1973;48:1104-10.
    • 35. Srinivasan M, Wilkes M, Stevenson F, Nguyen T, Slavin S. Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions. Academic Medicine. 2007 Jan;82(1):74-82.
    • 36. Yoo MS, Park JH, Lee SR. The effects of case-based learning using video on clinical decision making and learning motivation in undergraduate nursing students. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2010;40(6):863-71.
    • 37. Davis TM, Shepherd B, Zwiefelhofer T. Reviewing for exams: Do crossword puzzles help in the success of student learning? Journal of Effective Teaching. 2009;9:4-10.
    • 38. Ginsberg SM. “Mind the Gap” in the classroom. Journal of Effective Teaching. 2010;10:74-80.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article