Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Gauchotte-Lindsay, Caroline; McGregor, Laura A.; Assal, Antoine; Thomas, Russell; Kalin, Robert M. (2014)
Publisher: Wiley-VCH Verlag
Languages: English
Types: Article
Accuracy is the most important issue when carrying out compound specific\ud stable isotope analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons extracted from\ud complex samples. It depends on two main factors: the possible isotopic\ud fractionation of the compounds during extraction and the potential co‐elution\ud with interfering compounds with different isotopic signatures. We present here a\ud simplified pressurised liquid extraction method for compound specific stable\ud isotope analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in non‐aqueous\ud phase liquids of coal tar. Samples extracted using the new method and using\ud fractionation on silica gel column were analysed using comprehensive twodimensional\ud gas chromatography. We were able to evaluate the effect of coelution\ud on carbon and hydrogen stable isotope signatures of the 16 US EPA\ud priority PAHs in the coal tars with various proportions of aromatic and aliphatic\ud content. Even in samples that presented a good baseline resolution, the PAHs of\ud interest co‐eluted with other aromatic compounds with a notable effect on their\ud stable isotope values; it demonstrated the necessity to check the quality of all\ud extraction and clean‐up methods (either the simplified pressurized liquid\ud extraction or more traditional labour‐intensive methods) for the more complex\ud samples prior to data interpretation. Additionally, comprehensive twodimensional\ud gas chromatography enabled visualisation of the suspected coelutions\ud for the first time.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] G. Liu et al., Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol, 2008, 192, 1‐28.
    • [2] Y. V. Pashin, L. M. Bakhitova, Environ. Health Perspect., 1979, 30, 185‐ 189.
    • [3] S. D. Emsbo‐Mattingly P. Boehm., Technical Report 1005289, 2003 Electric Power Research Institute.
    • [4] R. P. Philp, Environ. Chem. Letters, 2007, 5, 57‐66.
    • [5] W. Meier‐Augenstein, J. Chrom A, 1999, 842, 351‐371.
    • [6] A. J. Buczyńska et al., Talanta, 2013, 105C, 435‐450.
    • [7] M. Blessing et al., Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2008, 390, 591‐603.
    • [8] M. Elsner, J. Environ. Monit., 2010, 12, 2005‐2031.
    • [9] L. Mazeas, H. Budzinski, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2002, 36, 130‐137.
    • [10] L. A. McGregor et al., J. Chrom A, 2011, 1218, 4755‐4763.
    • [11] L. A. McGregor et al, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2012, 46, 3744‐3752.
    • [12] C. Gauchotte‐Lindsay, J. Chrom A, 2012, 1293, 154‐165.
    • [13] M. C. Graham, STOTEN, 2006, 360, 81‐89.
    • [14] R. P. Philp, E. Jarde in Introduction to Environmental Forensics, Second Edition (Eds: B. L. Murphy, R. D. Morrison), Elsevier B. V,, Amsterdam, 2007, pp 455‐512.
    • [15] L. Mansuy et al., Environ. Sci. Technol., 1997, 31, 3417‐3425.
    • [16] A. Steinbah et al., Environ. Sci. Technol., 2004, 38, 609‐612.
    • [17] D. Saber et al., Environ. Forensics, 2006, 7, 65‐75.
    • [18] C. McRae et al., Organic Geochem., 1999, 30, 881‐889. Received: ((will be filled in by the editorial staff)) Published online: ((will be filled in by the editorial staff))
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article