Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Oreggia, Eleonora Maria Irene
Publisher: Goldsmiths, University of London
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
This thesis uses computational art practice to explore the question of indeterminacy and uncertainty in contemporary societies. It explores the issues navigating through different disciplines, starting from a preamble where the discoveries of quantum mechanics are confronted with the vision of modern and contemporary empiricists and re-articulated in post-structuralism and postmodernism. The approach from physics and determinism moves towards one of the classic questions of philosophy, that of free will. The state of indecision is described as the act of making a decision, an act extended in time – eventually to infinity.\ud \ud The reflection leads to the field of generative semiotics. Since the use of oracles to make decisions is also a peculiarity of humans, the distance that articulated language creates between reality and signs is proposed as a disruption that fosters the dichotomy of instinct and rationality. In this fracture nature assumes the form of the divine, whereas rationality is a procedural form. Technology, as an ultimate expression of this rational form, surpasses humans in procedural decision making capabilities, becoming a novel instrument to reach a divine union. Yet, early computing showed that, to halt a process resolving an undecidable problem, a machine has to receive an input of a different kind, an analog tape or an oracle as it were. The interaction with a different substance – the analogue sensor or a supernatural daemon – becomes the trigger to surpass a situation of impasse.\ud \ud The question of uncertainty is then transduced into an art work that responds as an intervention in that interdisciplinary space, materialising an aesthetic form that draws on elements of the absurd and the aliatory in art, all re-interpreted in a do-it-yourself hacker fashion, creating a peculiar noise drama that has the effect of a symbolic ritual, or, ultimately, its destructive illusions.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Courtes, A. J. G. . J. (1979, 1982). Semioics and Language. An analytical dictionary. Librairie Hachette, Indiana University Press.
    • Crowley, A. (1926.). The book of the Law. Liber al vel legis. Ordo Templi orientis. Red Wheel, San francisco, CA: 2006.
    • Davies, M. (2001). Engines of logic. Mathematicians and the origin of the computer. New york: Norton, 2001.
    • http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/tarski/, fall 2012 edition.
    • Guattari, F. (1992). Caosmosi. Genova: Costa I& Nolan, 1996.
    • Guattari, F. (2007). Texs and interviews 1972-1977. Los Angeles: Semiotexte.
    • Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy. The revolution in modern science. New York: Harper I& Row. New York, Prometeus Books: 1999.
    • Lacan, J. (2002). Il tempo logico e l'asserzione di certezza anticipata. In: Scritti. Einaudi, 2002.
    • Sebeok, T. A. (1977). Zoosemiotic components of human communication. How animals communicate. Indiana University Press Bloomington, pages 1055-1077.
    • Stuart Russel, P. N. (2010, 2003, 1995.). Artificial Intelligence. A modern approach. Prentice Hall, 2003. 1995 by Pearson Education.
    • Tarski, A. (1939). On well-ordered subsets of any set. Fundamentae Matematicae, 32:176-83.
    • Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality. An essay in cosmology. New York: Macmillan, 1929.
    • Wilhelm, H. W. . R. (1995). Understanding the I Ching. The Wilhelm lectures on the book of change. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.
    • Wittgenstein, L. (1921). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Annalen der Naturphilosophie 1921. New York: Routhledge, 2010.
    • Wittgenstein, L. (1969-1975). On Certainty (Uber Gewissheit). Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article