Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Willig, C. (2016)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BF

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: genetic structures
Objective\ud This paper reflects on the use of object elicitation in a phenomenological study of the experience of living with advanced cancer.\ud \ud Method\ud Object elicitation was used to assist data collection by facilitating participants’ reflections on the quality and texture of their lived experience. Participants were invited to select objects that held special meaning for them during the current phase of their lives, and to reflect on their relationship with these objects during a research interview.\ud \ud Findings\ud This paper reflects upon the opportunities and challenges inherent in the use of object elicitation. These include the method’s ability to prompt unrehearsed, in-the-moment reflections about what it means to be ‘living with dying’ as well as to shed light on participants’ sense of who they can be during this final phase of their lives. At the same time, the focus on objects can result in the imposition of an object-led structure on the interviews and a consequent failure to follow up on aspects of participants’ accounts which transcend their relationship with the objects they brought. A further challenge resides in the temptation to look for meaning in the objects themselves rather than in the participants’ use of, and relationship with, the objects.\ud \ud Conclusion\ud The paper formulates guidance on the use of object-elicitation.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Schiffer, M. (1999) The material life of human beings. Artifacts, behavior, and communication. New York: Routledge.
    • Silver, J. (2013) Visual methods. In C. Willig (2013) Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Third edition, chapter 13, Maidenhead: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.
    • Silver, J. and Reavey, P. (2010) 'He's a good-looking chap, ain't he ?': narrative and visualization of self in body dysmorphic disorder, Social Science & Medicine, 70(1):1641-7.
    • Tomich, P.L. & Helgeson, V.S. (2002) Five years later: A cross-sectional comparison of breast cancer survivors with healthy women, Psycho-Oncology, 11, 154-169.
    • Voogt, E., van der Heide, A., van Leeuwen, A.F., Visser, A.P., Cleiren, M.P.H.D., Passcher, J. & van der Maas, P.J. (2005) Positive and negative affect after diagnosis of advanced cancer, Psycho-Oncology, 14, 262-273.
    • Willig, C. and Nelson, C. (2014) “A window to the outside world”: How objects illuminate the life-world of people with advanced cancer. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Division of Counselling Psychology of the British Psychological Society 12th July 2014, London, UK.
    • Willig,C. (2015) "My Bus is Here": A phenomenological exploration of 'Living with Dying', Health Psychology, 34(4): 417-425.
    • Wood, E. and Latham, K.F. (2009) Object knowledge: Researching objects in the museum experience, Reconstruction: Studies in Contemporary Culture, 9.1: 1-10.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article