Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Gardiner, Mary M.; Allee, Leslie L.; Brown, Peter M.J.; Losey, John E.; Roy, Helen E.; Smyth, Rebecca Rice (2012)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: Zoology, Data and Information
Citizen scientists have the potential to play a crucial role in the study of rapidly changing lady beetle (Coccinellidae) populations. We used data derived from three coccinellid-focused citizen-science programs to examine the costs and benefits of data collection from direct citizen-science (data used without verification) and verified citizen-science (observations verified by trained experts) programs. Data collated through direct citizen science overestimated species richness and diversity values in comparison to verified data, thereby influencing interpretation. The use of citizen scientists to collect data also influenced research costs; our analysis shows that verified citizen science was more cost effective than traditional science (in terms of data gathered per dollar). The ability to collect a greater number of samples through direct citizen science may compensate for reduced accuracy, depending on the type of data collected and the type(s) and extent of errors committed by volunteers
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Dickinson JL, Zuckerberg B, and Bonter DN. 2010. Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 41: 149-72.
    • Dixon AFG. 2000. Insect predator-prey dynamics: ladybird beetles and biological control. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    • Droege S. 2007. Just because you paid them doesn't mean their data are better. Citizen Science Toolkit Conference. Ithaca, NY.
    • Galloway AWE, Tudor MT, and Vander Haegen WM. 2006. The reliability of citizen science: a case study of Oregon white oak stand surveys. Wildlife Soc B 34: 1425-29.
    • Gardiner MM, Landis DA, Gratton C, et al. 2009. Landscape diversity enhances biological control of an introduced crop pest in the north-central USA. Ecol Appl 19: 143-54.
    • Harmon JP, Stephens E, and Losey J. 2007. The decline of native coccinellids (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in the United States and Canada. J Insect Conserv 11: 85-94.
    • Harnick PG and Ross RM. 2003. Assessing data accuracy when involving students in authentic paleontological research. J Geosci Edu 51: 76-84.
    • Hilchey KG and Conrad CC. 2011. A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environ Monit Assess 176: 273-91.
    • Magurran AE. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science.
    • Miller DA, Nichols JD, McClintock BT, et al. 2011. Improving occupancy estimation when two types of observational error occur: non-detection and species misidentification. Ecology 92: 1422-28.
    • Roy HE, Adriaens T, Isaac NJB, et al. 2012. Invasive alien predator causes rapid decline of native European ladybirds. Divers Distrib 18: 717-25.
    • SAS Institute Inc. 2009. What's new in SAS 9.0, 9.1, 9.1.2, 9.1.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
    • Silvertown J. 2009. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 467-71.
    • Simpson EH. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 688.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article