Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Roberts, Jonathan C. (2000)
Publisher: SETO, London, UK
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: QA76
Visualizations are generated of diverse data and use many different techniques and visual methods. It is often beneficial to evaluate what is being visualized and how the visualization is made-up. Such an analysis may aid the developer, to understand what `tools' are available, and help the user to reference and compare different realizations. Display models specifically classify the data by what type of output can be created. We review many `display oriented models' and discuss important aspects of these methods and ideas. In presenting these models we encourage their use. In particular we focus on the symbolic reference model of Jacques Bertin. He used this model to describe images and 2D visualizations. We translate Bertin's scheme into an algebraic form as a method to describe visualizations.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] J. Bertin. Graphics and graphic information-processing. Walter de Gruyter, 1981. William J. Berg and Paul Scott (Translators).
    • [2] J. Bertin. Semiology of Graphics, translation from SeĀ“milogie graphique (1967). The University of Winsonsin Press, 1983. William J. Berg (Translator).
    • [3] C. G. Beshers and S. K. Feiner. Automated design of data visualizations. In L. Rosenblum, R. A. Earnshaw, J. Encarnacao, H. Hagen, A. Kaufman, S. Klimenko, G. Nielson, F. Post, and D. Thalmann, editors, Scientific Visualization Advances and Challenges, pages 87-102. IEEE Computer Society Press and Academic Press, 1994.
    • [4] K. Brodlie. A classification scheme for scientific visualization. In R. E. Earnshaw and D. Watson, editors, Animation and Scientific Visualization - Tools and Applications, pages 125-140. Academic Press, 1993.
    • [5] B. M. Collins. Data visualization - has it all been seen before? In R. E. Earnshaw and D. Watson, editors, Animation and Scientific Visualization - Tools and Applications, pages 3-28. Academic Press, 1992. 0-12-227745-7.
    • [6] R. A. Earnshaw and N. Wiseman. An Introductory Guide to Scientific Visualization. Springer-Verlag, 1992.
    • [7] B. Fortner. The Data Handbook (Second Edition) - A guide to Understanding the organisation and Visualization of Technical Data. Springer-Verlag, 1995.
    • [8] R. B. Haber and D. A. McNabb. Visualization idioms: A conceptual model for scientific visualization systems. In B. Shriver, G. M. Nielson, and L. J. Rosenblum, editors, Visualization in Scientific Computing, pages 74-93. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1990.
    • [9] M.-A. Halse, D. Young, and L. McCormick. IRIS Explorer User's Guide. Silicon Graphics Computer Systems - Silicon Graphics Inc., 1992. (Document Number 007-1371- 020).
    • [10] W. L. Hibbard, C. R. Dyer, and B. E. Paul. A lattice model for data display. In Proceedings Visualization '94 - sponsored by the IEEE Computer Society, pages 310-317, 1994.
    • [11] Karen R. Atkinson and Jonathan C. Roberts. Graphics and Visualization within Cross-Stitch. In Eurographics UK 1999 Conference Proceedings, 17th Annual Conference, pages 129-141, Eurographics UK, PO Box 38, Abington, Oxon, OX14 1PX, April 1999.
    • [12] J. Lohse, H. Rueter, K. Biolsi, and N. Walker. Classifying visual knowledge representations: A foundation for visualization research. In Proceedings Visualization '90, pages 131-138. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1990.
    • [13] B. Lucas, G. D. Abram, N. S. Collins, D. A. Epstein, D. L. Gresh, and K. P. McAuliffe. An architecture for a scientific visualization system. In Proceedings Visualization '92, pages 107-114. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1992.
    • [14] J. Mackinlay. Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. ACM transactions on Graphics, 5(2):110-141, 1986.
    • [15] J. C. Roberts. Multiple-view and multiform visualization. In R. F. Erbacher, P. Chen, J. C. Roberts, and C. Wittenbrink, editors, Visual Data Exploration and Analysis VII, Proceedings of SPIE, volume 3960. IS&T and SPIE, January 2000.
    • [16] H. Senay and E. Ignatius. A knowledge-based system for visualization design. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 14(6):36-47, November 1994.
    • [17] J. A. Simpson and E. S. C. Weiner. The Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.
    • [18] L. A. Treinish. Unifying principles of data management for scientific visualization. In R. E. Earnshaw and D. Watson, editors, Animation and Scientific Visualization - Tools and Applications, pages 141-170. Academic Press, 1993.
    • [19] C. Upson, T. Faulhaber, D. Kamins, D. Schlegel, D. Laidlaw, F. Vroom, R. Gurwitz, and A. van Dam. The application visualization system: A computational environment for scientific visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 9(4):30-42, 1989.
    • [20] G. Wallas. The art of thought. London, Jonathan Cape, 1858.
    • [21] L. R. Wanger, J. A. Ferwerda, and D. P. Greenberg. Perceiving spatial relationships in computer-generated images. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 12(3):44-58, May 1992.
    • [22] S. Wehrend and C. Lewis. A problem-oriented classification of visualization techniques. In Proceedings Visualization '90, pages 139-143. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1990.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article