Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Noe, Nyala; Whitaker, Roger Marcus; Chorley, Martin; Pollet, Thomas V. (2016)
Publisher: Elsevier
Journal: Computers in Human Behavior
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Human-Computer Interaction, Psychology(all), C800
In this paper we consider whether people with similar personality traits have a preference for common locations. Due to the difficulty in tracking and categorising the places that individuals choose to visit, this is largely unexplored. However, the recent popularity of location-based social networks (LBSNs) provides a means to gain new insight into this question through checkins - records that are made by LBSN users of their presence at specific street level locations. A web-based participatory survey was used to collect the personality traits and checkin behaviour of 174 anonymous users, who, through their common check-ins, formed a network with 5373 edges and an approximate edge density of 35%. We assess the degree of overlap in personality traits for users visiting common locations, as detected by user checkins. We find that people with similar high levels of conscientiousness, openness or agreeableness tended to have checked-in locations in common. The findings for extraverts were unexpected in that they did not provide evidence of individuals assorting at the same locations, contrary to predictions. Individuals high in neuroticism were in line with expectations, they did not tend to have locations in common. Unanticipated results concerning disagreeableness are of particular interest and suggest that different venue types and distinctive characteristics may act as attractors for people with particularly selective tendencies. These findings have important implications for decision-making and location.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Allport, G. W. (1966). Traits revisited. American psychologist, 21(1), 1e10.
    • Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Vinitzky, G. (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1289e1295.
    • Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Wainapel, G., & Fox, S. (2002). “on the internet no one knows i'm an introvert”: extroversion, neuroticism, and internet interaction. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 5(2), 125e128.
    • Amiel, T., & Sargent, S. L. (2004). Individual differences in internet usage motives. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(6), 711e726.
    • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2008). The prediction of honestyhumility-related criteria by the HEXACO and five-factor models of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1216e1228.
    • Balmaceda, J. M., Schiaffino, S., & Godoy, D. (2013). How do personality traits affect communication among users in online social networks? Online Information Review, 38, 136e153.
    • Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los cinco grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: multitrait-multimethod analyses of the big five in spanish and english. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729.
    • Block, J. (2001). Millennial contrarianism: the five-factor approach to personality description 5 years later. Journal of Research in Personality, 35(1), 98e107.
    • Bollen, J., Gonçalves, B., Ruan, G., & Mao, H. (2011). Happiness is assortative in online social networks. Artificial life, 17, 237e251.
    • Cho, E., Myers, S. A., & Leskovec, J. (2011). Friendship and mobility: user movement in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1082e1090). ACM.
    • Chorley, M. J., Whitaker, R. M., & Allen, S. M. (2015). Personality and location-based social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 45e56.
    • Colombo, G. B., Chorley, M. J., Williams, M. J., Allen, S. M., & Whitaker, R. M. (2012, March). You are where you eat: foursquare checkins as indicators of human mobility and behaviour. In Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 2012 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 217e222). IEEE.
    • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory: Manual, form S and form R. Psychological Assessment Resources.
    • Cramer, H., Rost, M., & Holmquist, L. E. (2011). Performing a check-in: emerging practices, norms and'conflicts' in location-sharing using foursquare. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services (pp. 57e66). ACM.
    • Cranshaw, J., Schwartz, R., Hong, J. I., & Sadeh, N. M. (2012). The livehoods project: utilizing social media to understand the dynamics of a city. In Proceedings of the sixth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media (pp. 58e65). AAAI.
    • Croft, D. P., James, R., Ward, A. J. W., Botham, M. S., Mawdsley, D., & Krause, J. (2005). Assortative interactions and social networks in fish. Oecologia, 143(2), 211e219.
    • Dancey, C., & Reidy, J. (2014). Statistics without maths for psychology (6th ed.). Pearson.
    • Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: emergence of the five factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417e440.
    • Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative description of personality : the big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216e1229.
    • Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the bigfive personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504e528.
    • Graham, L. T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Can the ambiance of a place be determined by the user profiles of the people who visit it?. In Proceedings of the fifth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media (pp. 145e152). AAAI.
    • Hamburger, Y. a., & Ben-Artzi, E. (2000). Relationship between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(4), 441e449.
    • Hough, L. M., & Oswald, F. L. (2008). Personality testing and industrialeorganizational psychology: reflections, progress, and prospects. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(3), 272e290.
    • Jadin, T., Gnambs, T., & Batinic, B. (2013). Personality traits and knowledge sharing in online communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 210e216.
    • Jokela, M., Bleidorn, W., Lamb, M. E., Gosling, S. D., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2015). Geographically varying associations between personality and life satisfaction in the london metropolitan area. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (pp. 725e730).
    • Joseph, K., Tan, C. H., & Carley, K. M. (2012). Beyond local, categories and friends: clustering foursquare users with latent topics. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM conference on ubiquitous computing (pp. 919e926). ACM.
    • Kassarjian, H. H. (1971). Personality and consumer behavior: a review. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(4), 409e418.
    • Kossinets, G., & Watts, D. J. (2009). Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. American Journal of Sociology, 115(2), 405e450.
    • Landers, R. N., & Lounsbury, J. W. (2006). An investigation of big five and narrow personality traits in relation to internet usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 283e293.
    • Launay, J., & Dunbar, R. I. (2015). Does implied community size predict likeability of a similar stranger? Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(1), 32e37.
    • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the hexaco personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329e358.
    • Lee, K., Ogunfowora, B., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Personality traits beyond the big five: are they within the hexaco space? Journal of Personality, 73(5), 1437e1463.
    • Lindqvist, J., Cranshaw, J., Wiese, J., Hong, J., & Zimmerman, J. (2011). I'm the mayor of my house: examining why people use foursquare-a social-driven location sharing application. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2409e2418). ACM.
    • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81e90.
    • McCrae, R., Costa, P., Jr., & Martin, T. (2005). The neo pi 3: a more readable revised neo personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(3), 37e41.
    • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415e444.
    • Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Does quick to blame mean quick to anger? The role of agreeableness in dissociating blame and anger. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), 856e867.
    • Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today, 1(1), 61e67.
    • Newman, M. E. J. (2000). Models of the small world. Journal of Statistical Physics, 101(3), 819e841.
    • Noulas, A., Scellato, S., Mascolo, C., & Pontil, M. (2011). An empirical study of geographic user activity patterns in foursquare. ICwSM, 11, 570e573.
    • Pelechrinis, K., & Krishnamurthy, P. (2015). Socio-spatial affiliation networks. Computer Communications.
    • Quercia, D., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., & Crowcroft, J. (2011). Our twitter profiles, our selves: predicting personality with twitter. In Privacy, security, risk and trust (PASSAT) and 2011 IEEE third inernational conference on social computing (SocialCom), 2011 IEEE third international conference on. IEE (pp. 180e185). E.
    • Rawlings, D., & Ciancarelli, V. (1997). Music preference and the five-factor model of the neo personality inventory. Psychology of Music, 25(2), 120e132.
    • Rentfrow, P. J., Jokela, M., & Lamb, M. E. (2015). Regional personality differences in great britain. Plos One, 10(3), 1e20.
    • Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 578e586.
    • Schrammel, J., Ko€ffel, C., & Tscheligi, M. (2009). Personality traits, usage patterns and information disclosure in online communities. In Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI group annual conference on people and computers: Celebrating people and technology (pp. 169e174).
    • Schwartz, R., & Halegoua, G. R. (2014). The spatial self: Location-based identity performance on social media (pp. 1e18). New Media & Society.
    • Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and big five personality traits: a social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509e538.
    • Shen, J., Brdiczka, O., & Liu, J. (2015). Computers in human behavior a study of facebook behavior : what does it tell about your neuroticism and extraversion ? Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 32e38.
    • Sherman, R. A., Nave, C. S., & Funder, D. C. (2012). Properties of persons and situations related to overall and distinctive personality-behavior congruence. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(1), 87e101.
    • Srivastava, S., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: set like plaster or persistent change? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1041.
    • Swickert, R. J., Hittner, J. B., Harris, J. L., & Herring, J. A. (2002). Relationships among internet use, personality, and social support. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(4), 437e451.
    • Wang, D., Pedreschi, D., Song, C., Giannotti, F., & Barabasi, A.-L. (2011). Human mobility, social ties, and link prediction. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1100e1108). ACM.
    • Wehrli, S. (2009). Personality on social network sites: An application of the five factor model. ETH Zurich Sociology.
    • Weijters, B., Cabooter, E., & Schillewaert, N. (2010). The effect of rating scale format on response styles: the number of response categories and response category labels. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(3), 236e247.
    • Williams, M. J., Whitaker, R. M., & Allen, S. M. (2012). Decentralised detection of periodic encounter communities in opportunistic networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(8), 1544e1556.
    • Zhang, K., & Pelechrinis, K. (2014). Understanding spatial homophily: the case of peer influence and social selection. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on world wide web (pp. 271e282). ACM.
    • Ziegler, C. N., & Golbeck, J. (2007). Investigating interactions of trust and interest similarity. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 460e475.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • RCUK | DTA - Cardiff University

Related to

  • fet-fp7FET Proactive: FET proactive 5: Self-Awareness in Autonomic Systems
  • fet-fp7FET Proactive: Relevance and cognition for self-awareness in a content-centric Internet

Cite this article