Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hewlett, Denise; Harding, Lisa; Munro, Tom; Terradillos, Ainara; Wilkinson, Keith (2016)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: N231, N870, K320, K400, K422, L710, N832, L800
References to the subjective notion of tranquillity have long been extensively deployed in marketing\ud literature and in planning policy in relation to both its promotion and its protection, particularly in protected\ud areas. Whilst a liberal use of the term has ensued, a plethora of research interprets tranquillity\ud primarily with noise, and where broader interpretations are progressed, traditional, directional questioning\ud techniques are evident in attempts to understand tranquillity and quantify its features. Surprisingly,\ud few enquiries have taken a broader, inductive approach to determining the range of stakeholders’ views\ud and of these even fewer have engaged specifically with local residents and particularly those classed as\ud hard-to-reach. Using these latter approaches, of the few and most recent studies conducted, the Broadly\ud Engaging with Tranquillity project provides a replicable framework for determining and mapping tranquillity.\ud An extensive community engagement process launched the study, using participatory principles\ud from which stakeholders’ views were modelled using Geographical Information Systems. Results of this\ud research are reported together with an interpretation of the models created according to four distinct\ud groups representing views of institutions and members of the public. Similar views are identified amongst\ud the groups with tranquillity commonly related to natural environments, whereas nontranquillity was\ud primarily equated to seeing and hearing people and the products of human activity. Yet distinctions are\ud identified between the four groups that have important implications for who should be involved in determining\ud local characteristics of tranquillity and for how protected area managers might include nonexpert\ud views in their understanding and conservation of tranquillity.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Beirle, T. T. C., & Konisky, D. M. (2001). What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning − the Great Lakes. Environment & Planning C: Government and Policy, 19, 515-527.
    • Bell, S. (1999). Tranquillity mapping as an aid to forest planning. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission.
    • Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Dudley, N., Jaeger, T., Lassen, B., Lassen, N., Pathak Broome, B., et al. (2013). Governance of protected areas: From understanding to action. best practice protected area guideline. series No. 20. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
    • Berto, R. (2014). The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: A literature review on restorativeness. Behavioural Sciences, 4(4), 394-409.
    • Bradbury Huang, H. (2010). What is good action research? Why the resurgent interest? Action Research, 8(93), 93-109.
    • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validity by the multi-trait: Multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
    • Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22, 953-969.
    • Conrad, E., Cassar, L. F., Christie, M., & Fazey, I. (2011). Hearing but not listening? A participatory assessment of public participation in planning. Environment & Planning C: Government and Policy, 29, 1-782.
    • Countryside Commission and Countryside Council for Wales. (1991). Areas of outstanding natural beauty, a policy statement (Vol. 356) Cheltenham: CCP.
    • Campaign Protection Rural England. (2006). Saving tranquil places. London: CPRE.
    • Campaign Protection Rural England. (2007). Tranquillity map: England. [Retrieved from:http://www.cpre.org.uk/resources/countryside/tranquil-places/item/ 1839]
    • Campaign Protection Rural England. (2015). Give peace a chance. Has planning policy contributed to rural tranquillity? London: CPRE.
    • Daniel, T. (2001). Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 267-281.
    • DCLG. (2012). National planning policy framework. London: HMSO.
    • Dennett, D. C. (1998). Postmodernism and Truth for the World Congress of Philosophy. [Retrieved from: http://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/papers/postmod.tru.htm]
    • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Mixed methods research. London: SAGE.
    • DEFRA. (2000). Our Countryside: The Future − A Fair Deal for Rural England. [Retrieved from:] http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/ruralwp/whitepaper/default. htm]
    • Dudley, N., Stolton, S., & Shadie, P. (2008). Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. Switzerland: IUCN Gland [x + 86pp. WITH stolton].
    • Dudley, N., Birksham, G., Jackson, B., Jeanrennaud, J. P., Oviedo, G., Phillips, A., et al. (1999). Challenges for protected areas in the 21st century. In S. Stolton, & N. Dudley (Eds.), Partnerships for Protection (pp. 3-12). London: Earthscan.
    • European Landscape Convention Treaty Series No. 36 (2012). Florence, 20 October 2000 London: TSO.
    • Fielding, N. G. (2012). Triangulation and Mixed Methods Designs: Data integration with new research technologies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 124-136.
    • Fuller, D. (2005). Chilterns tranquillity study: Report on the participatory appraisal consultations in the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Unpublished Report, Division of Geography. Northumbria University.
    • Gidl o¨f-Gunnarsson, A., & O¨hrstr o¨m, E. (2007). Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: The potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83, 115-126.
    • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
    • Graham, S., & Healey, P. (1999). Relational concepts of space and place. Issues for Planning Theory and Practice, 7(5), 623-646.
    • Haas, G., & Wakefield, T. (1998). National parks and the American public: A national public opinion survey on the national park system. Washington, D.C. and Fort Collins, CO: National Parks and Conservation Association and Colorado State University.
    • (2005). Place identity, participation and planning. London: Routledge.
    • Herzog, T. R., & Barnes, G. J. (1999). Tranquillity and preference revisited. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 171-181.
    • Hewlett, D. (2015). Broadly engaging with tranquillity Project Report I: GIS. [Retrieved from: http://reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/851934/203/PJR 1 Master Findings FINAL.pdf]
    • Hewlett, D., & Edwards, J. (2013). Beyond prescription: Community engagement in the planning and management of national parks as tourist destinations. Tourism Planning & Development, 10(1), 45-63.
    • Hewlett, D., & Harding, L. (2015a). Broadly engaging with tranquillity. Project Report II: Householders. [Retrieved from: http://reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/851934/ 204/PJR 2 MASTER BETP Final.pdf]
    • Hewlett, D., & Harding, L. (2015b). Broadly Engaging with Tranquillity. [Project report III: Visitors Retrieved from: http://reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/851934/ 87/PJR 3 MASTER BETP FINAL.pdf]
    • ICOMOS. (2011). Guidance on heritage impact assessments for cultural world heritage properties. Paris: ICOMOS.
    • IUCN. (2003). The Durban Action Plan World Park Congress 2003 Durban [Retrieved from: https://www.iucn.org]
    • Jackson, S., Fuller, D., Dunsford, H., Mowbray, R., Hext, S., MacFarlane, R., & Haggett, C. (2008). Tranquillity Mapping: Developing a robust methodology for planning support. Centre for Environmental & Spatial Analysis, Northumbria University, Bluespace environments and the University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.
    • James, W. (1995). Pragmatism. In R. B. Goodwin (Ed.), Pragmatism a contemporary reader (pp. 53-75). London: Routledge.
    • Kaplan, S. (2001). Meditation, restoration, and the management of mental fatigue. Environment & Behaviour, 33(4), 480-506.
    • Kil, N., Holland, S. M., & Stein, T. V. (2013). Place meanings and participatory planning intentions. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, 27, 475-491.
    • Koc, E., & Boz, H. (2014). Triangulation in tourism research. Tourism Management Perspectives, 12, 9-14.
    • Ledwith, M. (2005). Community development a critical approach. Bristol: Policy Press.
    • Legacy, C. (2010). Investigating the knowledge interface between stakeholder engagement and plan-making. Environment and Planning A, 42, 2705-2720.
    • MacFarlane, R., Haggett, C., Fuller, D., Dunsford, H., & Carlisle, B. (2004). Tranquillity mapping: Developing a robust methodology for planning support, Report to the Campaign to Protect Rural England, Countryside Agency, North East Assembly, Northumberland Strategic Partnership, Northumberland National Park Authority and Durham County Council, Centre for Environmental & Spatial Analysis. Northumbria University.
    • Miller, N. P. (2008). US National Parks and management of park soundscapes: A review. Applied Acoustics, 69, 77-92.
    • NAAONB. (2012). Areas of outstanding natural beauty. [Retrieved from: http://www. aonb.org.uk/80256CD200319C8E/PublishedContent/ E2A6B120D1308D7480256CED0061D328?OpenDocument &AutoFramed#Designation]
    • OJEC. (2002). DIRECTIVE 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council 189/12 18.7.2002.
    • Natural England. (2009). Guidelines for implementing the European Landscape Convention Part 2: integrating the intent of the ELC into plans policies and strategies. London: Natural England.
    • NPPUK. (2015). Tourism−reasons for Visiting National Parks [Retrieved from: http:// www.nationalparks.gov.uk/students/ourchallenges/tourism]
    • Pavloskaya, M. (2009). Non-quantitative GIS. In M. Cope, & S. Elwood (Eds.), Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach to integrating qualitative research and Geographic Information Systems. London: SAGE.
    • Pheasant, R. J., Horshonekov, K. V., & Watts, G. R. (2010). Tranquillity rating prediction tool (TRAPT). Acoustics Bulletin [Retrieved from:]. https://www. researchgate.net/publication/281400420
    • Pheasant, R. J., Fisher, M. N., Watts, G. R., Whitaker, D. J., & Horshonekov, K. V. (2010). The importance of auditory-visual interaction in the construction of 'tranquil space. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 501-509.
    • Phillips, A. (2001). Caring for the Assets −the effectiveness of protected area management. An International Conference on the Design and Management of Forest Protected Area [Retrieved from:]. http://www.panda.org/forests4life/ spotlights/trees/bt/philpaper.htm
    • Phillips, A. (2002). Management guidelines for IUCN category V protected areas: Protected landscapes/seascapes. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN.
    • Pieraccini, M. (2015). Democratic legitimacy and new commons: Examples from English protected areas. International Journal of the Commons, 9(2), 552-572.
    • Pimbert, M., & Pretty, J. (1997). Parks, People and Professionals: Putting participation into protected area management. In K. B. Ghimire, & M. P. Pimbert (Eds.), Social change and conservation (pp. 297-330). London: Earthscan.
    • Powell, J., Selman, P., & Wragg, A. (2002). Protected areas: Reinforcing the virtuous circle. Planning Practice & Research, 17(3), 279-295.
    • Reason, P. (2006). Choice & quality in action research practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(2), 187-203.
    • Selman, P. (2002). Multi-function landscape plans: A missing link in sustainable planning. Local Environment, 7(3), 283-294.
    • Selman, P., & Swanwick, C. A. (2010). On the meaning of natural beauty in landscape legislation. Landscape Research, 35(1), 3-26.
    • Shadie, S. P., & Dudley, N. (2013). IUCN WCPA best practice guidance on recognising protected areas and assigning management categories and governance types, best practice protected area guidelines series No. 21. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
    • Shannon, G., McKenna, M. F., Angeloni, L. M., Crooks, K. R., Fristrup, K. M., Brown, E., et al. (2015). A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife. Biological. Review, 91 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12207
    • South West Research Company Ltd. (2014). The Economic Impact of Dorset's Visitor Economy 2015. [Retrieved from: https://www.dorsetforyou.gov.uk/article/ 332737/Tourism-statistics]
    • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage handbook of mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    • Terradillos, A., & Wilkinson, K. N. (2015). Broadly engaging with tranquillity. Project Report IV:GIS. [Retrieved from: http://reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/851934/197/ PRJ4-Final-10-September-2015.pdf]
    • Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Thomas, H. (1998). Collaborative action in local plan-making: Planners' perceptions of planning through debate. Environment & Planning B: Planning and Design, 25, 127-144.
    • Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201-230.
    • University of Edinburgh. (2014). Digimap. Retrieved from: http://digimap.edina.ac. uk [Last accessed 26 February 2014]
    • Van Wyk, E., Breen, C., & Freimund, W. (2014). Meanings and Robustness: Propositions for enhancing benefit sharing in social-ecological systems. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 576-594.
    • Watts, G. R., & Pheasant, R. J. (2015). Identifying tranquil environments and quantifying impacts. Applied Acoustics, 89, 122-127.
    • Weldon, S. (2004). Social Science in Forestry: Public participation and partnership: A review of Forestry commission Practice and Governance in a changing political and economic context. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission.
    • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research. London: SAGE.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article