Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Cronin, Bruce (2012)
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
Subjects: HC, HT
Corporate power in Britain is multifaceted, multilayered and geographically structured. In contrast to the classic rise of the capitalist class, the established landed aristocracy was not overthrown in Britain but became embedded in its ascendancy, an articulation that strongly marks institutional forms of power to this day (Anderson 1964). The industrial revolution that drove the accumulation of national wealth in nineteenth-century Britain had its catalyst in the wealth of international trade and plunder, and in turn was quickly followed by international corporate expansion. British capital dominated international investment through to the Second World War and today still accounts for the world’s second largest overseas direct investment stock (Dunning and Archer 1987; United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 2011). So the British corporate elite are intimately structured by a complex of national and transnational influences.\ud \ud Periodic attempts to delve into the growing documentary archive of elite relationships in Britain have barely pierced the outer layers of the structures of corporate elite cohesion, however. The availability of data and the potentially strategic importance of a director’s role have led attention primarily towards interlocking directorships (Aaronovitch 1956; Useem 1984; Windolf 2002), while the mining of biographical databases provides an entry-point into elite schools, clubs and social circles (Sampson 1962). But these are only limited components of the taxonomy of multiple layers of inter-organizational bonds proposed by Scott and Griff (1984) as constituting elite cohesion, let alone extended to national and transnational dimensions (see Table 8.1).\ud \ud This chapter takes a modest taxonomic step through these layers, reviewing and extending John Scott’s periodic studies (1986, 1991a, 1991b, 2003; Scott and Griff 1984) of British director interlocks, temporarily and methodologically, and then considers the pattern of interlocks in the context of transnational influences on the British economy.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Aaronovitch, S. (1956), The Ruling Class: A Study of British Finance Capital London: Lawrence and Wishart.
    • Anderson, Perry (1964), 'Origins of the Present Crisis', New Left Review (23), 26-53.
    • Bain, Harry Foster (1976), Ores and Industry in South America. New York: Arno Press.
    • Barratt Brown, Michael (1974), The Economics of Imperialism. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    • Bond, Matthew (2004), 'Social Influences on Corporate Political Donations in Britain', British Journal of Sociology, 55 (1), 55-77.
    • Borgatti, S.P., M.G. Everett, and L.C. Freeman, 'Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis' (Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA, 2002).
    • Borgatti, Stephen P. and Martin G. Everett (1997), 'Network Analysis of 2-Mode Data', Social Networks, 19 (3), 243-269.
    • Brayshay, Mark, Mark Cleary, and John Selwood (2007), 'Social Networks and the Transnational Reach of the Corporate Class in the Early-Twentieth Century ', Journal of Historical Geography, 33 (1), 144-167.
    • Cain, Peter and Tony Hopkins (2001), British Imperialism 1688-2000. London: Longman.
    • Carroll, B. and M. Alexander (1999), 'Finance Capital and Capitalist Class Integration in the 1990s: Networks of Interlocking Directorships in the Canada and Australia', The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 36 (3), 331- 350.
    • Carroll, William K and Meindert Fennema (2002), 'Is There a Transnational Business Community?' International Sociology, 17 (3), 393-323.
    • Corley, T. A. B. (1994), 'Britain's Overseas Investments in 1914 Revisited', Business History, 36 (1), 71-88.
    • Cronin, Bruce and Vladimir Popov (2005), 'Director Networks and UK Corporate Performance', International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 4, 1195-1205.
    • Dekker, David, David Krackhardt, and Tom A. B. Snijders (2007), 'Sensitivity of Mrqap Tests to Collinearity and Autocorrelation Conditions ', Psychometrika, 72 (4), 563-581.
    • Dooley, P. C. (1969), 'The Interlocking Directorate', American Economic Review, 59 (3), 314-323.
    • Dunning, John H. and Howard Archer (1987), 'The Eclectic Paradigm and the Growth of UK Multinational Enterprise 1870-1983', Business and Economic History, 16 (1), 19-49.
    • Edelstein, Michael (2003), 'Foreign Investment, Accumulation and Empire', in Roderick Floud and Paul Johnson (eds), Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Vol. 2, pp. 190-226.
    • Fligstein, Neil and Peter Brantley (1992), 'Bank Control, Owner Control, or Organizational Dynamics: Who Controls the Large Modern Corporation?' American Journal of Sociology, 98 (2), 280-307.
    • Francis, Arthur (1980), 'Families, Firms and Finance Capital: The Development of Uk Industrial Firms with Particular Reference to Their Ownership and Control ', Sociology, 14 (1), 1-27.
    • Ingram, Geoffrey (1984), Capitalism Divided? The City and Industry in British Social Development. London: Macmillan.
    • Jones, Geoffrey (1988), 'Foreign Multinationals and British Industry before 1945', Economic History Review, 41 (3), 429-453.
    • Lisle-Williams, Michael (1984), 'Merchant Banking Dynasties in the English Class Structure: Ownership, Solidarity and Kinship in the City of London, 1850-1960', British Journal of Sociology, 35 (3), 333-362.
    • Mizruchi, Mark S. (1996), 'What Do Interlocks Do? Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates', Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271- 298.
    • Mizruchi, Mark S. and L. B. Stearns (1988), 'A Longitudinal Study of the Formation of Interlocking Directorates', Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (1), 194-210.
    • Nicholas, Stephen (1983), 'Agency Contracts, Institutional Modes, and the Transition to Foreign Direct Investment by British Manufacturing Multinationals before 1939', The Journal of Economic History, 43 (3), 675-686.
    • Nyman, Steve and Aubrey Silberston (1978), 'The Ownership and Control of Industry', Oxford Economic Papers, 30 (1), 74-101.
    • Ong, Chin-Huat, David Wan, and Kee-Sing Ong (2003), 'An Exploratory Study on Interlocking Directorates in Listed Firms in Singapore', Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11 (4), 322-334.
    • Ornstein, Michael (1984), 'Interlocking Directorates in Canada: Intercorporate or Class Alliance?' Administrative Science Quarterly, 29 (2), 210-231.
    • Sampson, Anthony (1962), The Anatomy of Britain. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
    • Scott, John (1991), 'Networks of Corporate Power: A Comparative Assessment.' Annual Review of Sociology, 17 (1), 181-202.
    • Scott, John (1986), Capitalist Property and Financial Power: A Comparative Study of Britain, the United States and Japan. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.
    • Scott, John (1991), Who Rules Britain? Cambridge: Polity in association with Basil Blackwell.
    • Scott, John and Catherine Griff (1984), Directors of Industry: The British Corporate Network, 1904-76. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Stokman, F.N., R. Ziegler, and J. Scott (eds) (1985), Networks of Corporate Power: A Comparative Analysis of Ten Countries, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Stopford, John M. (1974), 'The Origins of British-Based Multinational Manufacturing Enterprises', The Business History Review, 48 (3), 303-335.
    • Stopford, John M. and Louis Turner (1985), Britain and the Multinationals. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
    • United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations (1988), Transnational Corporations in World Development: Trends and Prospects. New York: United Nations.
    • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2011), World Investment Report 2011: Non-Equity Modes of International Production and Development. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
    • United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (1973), Multinational Corporations in World Development. New York: United Nations.
    • Useem, Michael (1984), The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the U.S. And U.K. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Windolf, P. (2002), Corporate Networks in Europe and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article