LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Scott, Michael; Ghinea, Gheorghita (2014)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: cs, edu, Self-beliefs, Learning behavior and achievement
Educational research shows that self-beliefs can have profound influences on learning behavior and achievement. It follows, then, that beliefs about the nature of programming aptitude (mindset) and the way individuals perceive themselves as programmers (self-concept) could have a salient impact on their programming practice. As such, new teaching methods could be used to support student self-beliefs and thereby encourage practice. However, valid measurement is needed to test this hypothesis. This paper presents the assembly and validation of a measurement instrument to support research into self-enrichment within the introductory programming context. An evaluation shows that the reliability and construct validity of the instrument are adequate, while the concurrent validity of the evaluation framework is satisfactory in the higher education context. However, future validation is required to establish cross-context validity.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] A. Bandura. Self-e cacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2):191 { 215, 1977.
    • [2] J. E. Bartlett, J. W. Kotrlik, and C. C. Higgins. Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal. 19(1):43 { 50, 2001.
    • [3] T. Beaubouef and J. Mason. Why the High Attrition Rate for Computer Science Students: Some Thoughts and Observations. SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(2):103 { 106, 2005.
    • [4] J. Bennedsen and M. E. Caspersen. Failure rates in introductory programming. SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(2):32 { 36, 2007.
    • [5] L. Blackwell, K. Trzesniewski, and C. S. Dweck. Implicit Theories of Intelligence Predict Achievement Across an Adolescent Transition: A Longitudinal Study and an Intervention. Child Development, 78:246 { 263, 2007.
    • [6] M. Bong and E. Skaalvik. Academic Self-Concept and Self-E cacy: How Di erent Are They Really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1):1 { 40, 2003.
    • [7] Q. Cutts, E. Cutts, S. Draper, P. O'Donnell, and P. Sa rey. Manipulating mindset to positively in uence introductory programming performance. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 431 { 435, 2010.
    • [8] R. F. DeVellis. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Sage: London, 3rd edition, 2012.
    • [9] B. Dorn and A. E. Tew. Becoming experts: Measuring attitude development in introductory computer science. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '13), pages 183 { 188, 2013.
    • [10] C. S. Dweck. Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA, 1999.
    • [11] C. S. Dweck and A. Master. Self-Theories Motivate Self-Regulated Learning. pages 31 { 51. Lawrence Erlabaum, New York, NY, 2008.
    • [12] J. S. Eccles, WignA,eld, and A. In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3:215 { 225, 1995.
    • [13] K. Ericsson, R. Krampe, and C. Tesch-Romer. The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance. Psychological Review, 100(3):363 { 406, 1993.
    • [14] J. Ferla, M. Valcke, and Y. Cai. Academic Self-E cacy and Academic Self-Concept: Reconsidering Structural Relationships. Learning and Individual Di erences, 19(4):499 { 505, 2009.
    • [15] C. Fornell, Larker, and D. F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18:39 { 50, 1981.
    • [16] F. Guay, H. W. Marsh, and M. Boivin. Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Developmental perspective on their causal ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95:124 { 136, 2003.
    • [17] M. Guzdial. From Science to Engineering. Communications of the ACM, 54(2):37 { 39, 2011.
    • [18] J. Hair, B. Black, B. Babin, and R. Anderson. Multivariate Data Analysis. Psychology Press, NJ, USA, 7th edition, 2009.
    • [19] M. Huggard. Programming Trauma: Can it be Avoided? In Paper presented at the BCS Conference on Grand Challenges in Computing: Education, page 50, 2004.
    • [20] T. Jenkins. Teaching Programming: A Journey from Teacher to Motivator. In 2nd HEA Conference for the ICS-LTSN, pages 53 { 58, 2001.
    • [21] T. Jenkins. On the Di culty of Learning to Program. 3rd HEA Conference for the ICS-LTSN, pages 1 { 8, 2002.
    • [22] P. Kinnunen and S. Beth. My Program is OK { Am I? Computing Freshman's Experience of Doing Programming Assignments. Computer Science Education, 22(1):1 { 28, 2012.
    • [23] P. Kinnunen and L. Malmi. Why Students Drop Out CS1 Courses? In Proceedings of the 2006 International Computing Education Research Workshop, pages 97 { 108, 2006.
    • [24] P. Kinnunen and B. Simon. Experiencing Programming Assignments in CS1: The Emotional Toll. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Computing Education Research, pages 77 { 86, 2010.
    • [25] R. B. Kline. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press, 2nd edition, 2005.
    • [26] D. R. Krathwohl, B. S. Bloom, and B. B. Masia. New York, NY: David McKay Co, 1973.
    • [27] I. M. Lyons and S. L. Beilock. When Math Hurts: Math Anxiety Predicts Pain Network Activation in Anticipation of Doing Math. PLOS One, 7:e48076, 2012.
    • [28] E. MacLellan. How might teachers enable self-con dence? A Review Study. Educational Review, 66(1):59 { 74, 2014.
    • [29] H. Marsh and A. Martin. Academic Self-Concept and Academic Achievement: Relations and Causal Ordering. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1):59 { 77, 2011.
    • [30] A. McGettrick, R. Boyle, R. Ibbett, J. Lloyd, G. Lovegrove, and K. Mander. Grand Challenges in Computing: Education - A Summary. The Computer Journal, 48(1):42 { 48, 2005.
    • [31] D. McKinney and L. F. Denton. Houston, We have a Problem: There's a Leak in the CS1 A ective Oxygen Tank. SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(1):236 { 239, 2004.
    • [32] L. Murphy and L. Thomas. Dangers of a Fixed Mindset: Implications of Self-Theories Research for Computer Science Education. SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(3):271 { 275, 2008.
    • [33] R. Pekrun. The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4):315 { 341, 2006.
    • [34] R. Pekrun and E. J. Stephens. Achievement Emotions: A Control-Value Approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4:238 { 255, 2010.
    • [35] A.-K. Peters and A. Pears. Engagement in Computer Science and IT { What! A Matter of Identity? In Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering Conference, pages 114 { 121, 2013.
    • [36] L. Porter and B. Simon. Retaining nearly one-third more majors with a trio of instructional best practices in CS1. In Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 165 { 170, 2013.
    • [37] J. Randolph, G. Julnes, E. Sutinen, and S. Lehman. A Methodological Review of Computer Science Education Research. Information Technology Education, 7(1):135 { 162, 2008.
    • [38] C. Rogerson and E. Scott. The Fear Factor: How it A ects Students Learning to Program in a Tertiary Environment. Information Technology Education, 9(1):147 { 171, 2010.
    • [39] M. J. Scott and G. Ghinea. Integrating Fantasy Role-Play into the Programming Lab: Exploring the 'Projective Identity' Hypothesis. In Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 119 { 122.
    • [40] M. J. Scott and G. Ghinea. Educating Programmers: A Re ection on Barriers to Deliberate Practice. In Proceedings of the 2nd HEA Conference on Learning & Teaching in STEM Disciplines, pages 85 { 90, 2013.
    • [41] M. J. Scott and G. Ghinea. On the Domain-Speci city of Mindsets: The Relationship Between Aptitude Beliefs and Programming Practice. IEEE Transactions on Education, in print.
    • [42] B. Simon, B. Hanks, L. Murphy, S. Fitzgerald, R. McCauley, L. Thomas, and C. Zander. Saying Isn't Necessarily Believing: In uencing Self-Theories in Computing. In Proceedings of the 4th Int. Workshop on Computing Education Research, pages 173 { 184, 2008.
    • [43] D. Straub, M.-C. Boudreau, and D. Gefen. Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13:380 { 427, 2004.
    • [44] A. E. Tew and B. Dorn. The Case for Validated Tools in Computing Education Research. Computer, 46(9):60 { 66, 2013.
    • [45] A. E. Tew and M. Guzdial. The FCS1: A Language Independent Assessment of CS1 Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 111 { 116, 2011.
    • [46] D. W. Valentine. CS Educational Research: A Meta-Analysis of SIGCSE Technical Symposium Proceedings. In Proceedings of the 35th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 255 { 259, 2004.
    • [47] S. Wiedenbeck. Factors a ecting the success of non-majors in learning to program. In Proceedings of the 1st Int. Workshop Computing Education Research, pages 13 { 24, 2005.
    • [48] A. Wig eld, J. S. Eccles, K. S. Yoon, R. D. Harold, A. J. A. Arbreton, and C. Freedman-Doan. Change in children's competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89:451 { 469, 1997.
    • [49] A. Wig eld, Meece, and J. L. Math anxiety in elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2):210 { 216, 1988.
    • [50] B. C. Wilson and S. Shrock. Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: A study of twelve factors. SIGCSE Bulletin, 33(1):184 { 188, 2001.
    • [51] L. E. Winslow. Programming Pedagogy - A Psychological Overview. SIGCSE Bulletin, 28(1):17 { 22, 1996.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article