Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Adams, Mike; Hardwick, Philip (1996)
Publisher: Bournemouth University School of Finance and Law
Languages: English
Types: Book
Subjects: com, bmm
Drawing a framework from stakeholder theory, this study uses 1994 data drawn\ud from 100 United Kingdom listed companies to test empirically whether the level of\ud discretionary donations made by companies to charitable, social and political causes\ud is related to four company-specific factors, namely leverage, company size,\ud profitability and ownership structure. Consistent with our hypotheses, the results\ud indicate that the decision to contribute funds to charities and other bodies is\ud positively related to company size and profitability and negatively related to\ud leverage. However, the study provides no support for the view that there is a link\ud between discretionary donations and a company’s ownership structure.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • ALEXANDER, G.J. and BUCHHOLZ, R.A. (1978). 'Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance.' Academy of Management Journal, 22, 3, 479-486.
    • ANDERSON, J.W. (1986). 'Social responsibility and the corporation.' Business Horizons, 29, 4, 22-27.
    • BALL, R. And FOSTER, G. (1982). 'Corporate financial reporting: A methodological review of empirical research.' Journal of Accounting Research, 20, Supplement, 161-234.
    • BARTON, S.L., HILL, N.C. and SUNDARAM, S. (1989). 'An empirical test of stakeholder theory predictions of capital structure.' Financial Management, 18, 1, 36-44.
    • BELKAOUI, A. and KARPIK, P.G. (1988). 'Determinants of the corporate decision to disclose social information.' Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 2, 1, 36-51.
    • BELSLEY, R.G., KUH, E. and WELSCH, R.E. (1980). Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: John Wiley.
    • BOOTH, J.R. (1992). 'Contract costs, bank loans, and the cross-monitoring hypothesis.' Journal of Financial Economics, 31, 1, 25-41.
    • CASSON, D. (1993). The Major Companies Guide: The Charitable and Community Support of the UK's 400 Leading Corporate Donors. Norwich: Directory of Social Change.
    • COCHRAN, P.L. and WOOD, R.A. (1984). 'Corporate social responsibility and financial performance.' Academy of Management Journal, 27, 1, 42-56.
    • CORNELL, B. And SHAPIRO, A. C. (1987). 'Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance.' Financial Management, 16, 1, 5-14.
    • COWEN, S.S., FERRERI, L.B. and PARKER, L.D. (1987). 'The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis.' Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12, 2, 111-122.
    • COWTON, C.J. (1986). A study of the disclosure of charitable donations by companies in the United Kingdom, London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
    • COWTON, C.J. (1987). 'Corporate philanthropy in the United Kingdom', Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 7, 553-558.
    • COWTON, C.J. (1989). 'The development of legal disclosure requirements: The case of charitable donations.' Accounting and Business Research, 20, 77, 25-30.
    • FISHER, J. (1994). 'Political donations to the Conservative Party'. Parliamentary Affairs: A Journal of Comparative Politics, 47, 1, 61-72.
    • FREEMAN, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach. Marshfield, Mass: Pittman.
    • GROSSMAN, S. and HART, O. (1980). 'Takeover bids, the free rider problem, and the theory of the corporation.' Bell Journal of Economics, 11, 1, 42-64.
    • HART, O. (1993). 'An economist's view of fiduciary duty.' LSE Financial Markets Group Discussion Paper No. 157, London School of Economics, London, UK.
    • HALEY, U.C.V. (1991). 'Corporate contributions as managerial masques: Reframing corporate contributions as strategies to influence society.' Journal of Management Studies, 28, 5, 485-509.
    • HILL, C.W.L. and JONES, T.M. (1992). 'Stakeholder-agency theory.' Journal of Management Studies, 29, 2, 131-154.
    • McGUIRE, J.B, SUNDGREN, A. and SCHNEEWEIS, T. (1988). 'Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance'. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 4, 854-872.
    • MESCON, T.S. and TILSON, D.J. (1987). 'Corporate philanthropy: A strategic approach to the bottom-line.' California Management Review, 29, 2, 49-61.
    • MOORE, G. (1995). 'Corporate community involvement in the UK - investment or atonement? Business Ethics: A European Review, 4, 3, 171-178.
    • NAVARRO, P. (1988). 'Why do corporations give to charity?' Journal of Business, 61, 1, 65-93.
    • PINTO-DUSCHINSKY, M. (1985). 'Trends in British political funding 1979-1983.' Parliamentary Affairs: A Journal of Comparative Politics, 38, 3, 328-347.
    • ROBERTS, R.W. (1992). 'Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory.' Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17, 6, 595-612.
    • ULLMANN, A. A. (1985). 'Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationship among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance.' Academy of Management Review, 10, 1-2, 540-557.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article