Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Harma, Tanguy
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
This paper will examine how Kerouac’s instrumental use of rambling and direct styles impacts the novella Tristessa (1960). I will decipher how the juxtaposition of such styles plays out the relationships of power at stake in the narrative, especially between the male-narrator (Duluoz) and the female-object of the book (Tristessa).\ud In the 1950s, Jack Kerouac (1922-1969) determined the stylistic features of what was to be called ‘spontaneous prose’. It is defined by critic Benedict Giamo as a ‘stream of consciousness that join[s] with the torrential flow of experience, [with] its sheer energy and rushing enthusiasm, natural rhythm, musical phrasing (when spoken), richly detailed imagery, and sonic jazz improvisation’ (Kerouac: The Word and the Way, 14). It is this stylistic device that is extensively used throughout Tristessa by means of an autodiegetic narrator (Duluoz), as I will show in the first part. The voice of the I-narrator will be identified, essentially, as a rambling style, which includes a set of stylistics (ellipses, punctuation, loose syntactical structures) that are idiosyncratic of Kerouac’s writing. The character of Tristessa, however, is treated differently, as the second part will investigate. As her voice is mediated and processed through direct (or indirect) speech by the narrator, her subjectivity dissolves; the narrator may therefore manipulate and abuse her voice at will for his own purposes.\ud It is this discrepancy between the narrator’s flux of consciousness on the one hand, and Tristessa’s occurrences on the other, that grounds the sexual politics of the novella. I will decipher the ways in which Tristessa’s direct speech in particular results in a process of objectification and othering of her persona; in fact, Tristessa does not belong to herself but to the narrator’s vision. I will show in a last part how she corresponds, ultimately, to a fantasy: an exotic, sexual fantasy devised by – and for – Duluoz, the US-born, white male I-narrator of the novella.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article