LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Saif, Hassan; He, Yulan; Fernández, Miriam; Alani, Harith (2016)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Sentiment analysis on Twitter has attracted much attention recently due to its wide applications in both, commercial and public sectors. In this paper we present SentiCircles, a lexicon-based approach for sentiment analysis on Twitter. Different from typical lexicon-based approaches, which offer a fixed and static prior sentiment polarities of words regardless of their context, SentiCircles takes into account the co-occurrence patterns of words in different contexts in tweets to capture their semantics and update their pre-assigned strength and polarity in sentiment lexicons accordingly. Our approach allows for the detection of sentiment at both entity-level and tweet-level. We evaluate our proposed approach on three Twitter datasets using three different sentiment lexicons to derive word prior sentiments. Results show that our approach significantly outperforms the baselines in accuracy and F-measure for entity-level subjectivity (neutral vs. polar) and polarity (positive vs. negative) detections. For tweet-level sentiment detection, our approach performs better than the state-of-the-art SentiStrength by 4-5% in accuracy in two datasets, but falls marginally behind by 1% in F-measure in the third dataset.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Agarwal, A., Xie, B., Vovsha, I., Rambow, O., Passonneau, R., 2011. Sentiment analysis of twitter data. In: Proc. ACL 2011 Workshop on Languages in Social Media. Portland, Oregon.
    • Aue, A., Gamon, M., 2005. Customizing sentiment classifiers to new domains: A case study. In: Proceedings of recent advances in natural language processing (RANLP). Borovets, Bulgaria.
    • Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F., 2010. Sentiwordnet 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Seventh conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation, Malta. Retrieved May. Valletta, Malta.
    • Barbosa, L., Feng, J., 2010. Robust sentiment detection on twitter from biased and noisy data. In: Proceedings of COLING. Beijing, China.
    • Batra, S., Rao, D., 2010. Entity based sentiment analysis on twitter. Science, 1-12.
    • Bifet, A., Frank, E., 2010. Sentiment knowledge discovery in twitter streaming data. In: Discovery Science. Canberra, Australia.
    • Cambria, E., 2013. An introduction to concept-level sentiment analysis. In: Advances in Soft Computing and Its Applications. Springer, pp. 478-483.
    • Cambria, E., Havasi, C., Hussain, A., 2012. Senticnet 2: A semantic and affective resource for opinion mining and sentiment analysis. In: FLAIRS Conference. pp. 202-207.
    • Diakopoulos, N., Shamma, D., 2010. Characterizing debate performance via aggregated twitter sentiment. In: Proc. 28th Int. Conf. on Human factors in computing systems. ACM.
    • Ding, X., Liu, B., Yu, P. S., 2008. A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the international conference on Web search and web data mining. Palo Alto, California, USA.
    • Firth, J. R., 1930- 1955. A synopsis of linguistic theory. Studies in Linguistic Analysis, 1-32.
    • Garcia-Moya, L., Anaya-Sanchez, H., Berlanga-Llavori, R., 2013. Retrieving product features and opinions from customer reviews. IEEE Intelligent Systems 28 (3), 19-27.
    • Go, A., Bhayani, R., Huang, L., 2009. Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision. CS224N Project Report, Stanford.
    • Jiang, L., Yu, M., Zhou, M., Liu, X., Zhao, T., 2011. Target-dependent twitter sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the eighth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Portland, Oregon.
    • Kouloumpis, E., Wilson, T., Moore, J., 2011. Twitter sentiment analysis: The good the bad and the omg! In: Proceedings of the ICWSM. Barcelona, Spain.
    • Krippendorff, K., 1980. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology.
    • Liu, B., 2010. Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. Handbook of natural language processing 2, 568.
    • Meng, X., Wei, F., Liu, X., Zhou, M., Li, S., Wang, H., 2012. Entity-centric topicoriented opinion summarization in twitter. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. Beijing, China.
    • Neviarouskaya, A., Prendinger, H., Ishizuka, M., 2011. Sentiful: A lexicon for sentiment analysis. Affective Computing, IEEE Transactions on, 22-36.
    • Pak, A., Paroubek, P., 2010. Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Proceedings of LREC 2010. Valletta, Malta.
    • Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., Niederhoffer, K. G., 2003. Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual review of psychology 54 (1), 547-577.
    • Saif, H., Fernandez, M., Alani, H., 2014a. Automatic stopword generation using contextual semantics for sentiment analysis of twitter. In: The 13th Semantic Web Conference (ISWC). Trentino, Italy.
    • Saif, H., Fernandez, M., He, Y., Alani, H., 2013. Evaluation datasets for twitter sentiment analysis a survey and a new dataset, the sts-gold. In: Proceedings, 1st Workshop on Emotion and Sentiment in Social and Expressive Media (ESSEM) in conjunction with AI*IA Conference. Turin, Italy.
    • Saif, H., Fernandez, M., He, Y., Alani, H., 2014b. On Stopwords, Filtering and Data Sparsity for Sentiment Analysis of Twitter. In: Proc. 9th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC). Reykjavik, Iceland.
    • Saif, H., Fernandez, M., He, Y., Alani, H., 2014c. Senticircles for contextual and conceptual semantic sentiment analysis of twitter. In: Proc. 11th Extended Semantic Web Conf. (ESWC). Crete, Greece.
    • Saif, H., He, Y., Alani, H., 2012a. Alleviating data sparsity for twitter sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings, 2nd Workshop on Making Sense of Microposts (#MSM2012) in conjunction with WWW 2012. Layon, France.
    • Saif, H., He, Y., Alani, H., 2012b. Semantic sentiment analysis of twitter. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on The Semantic Web. Boston, MA.
    • Saif, H., He, Y., Fernandez, M., Alani, H., 2014d. Semantic patterns for sentiment analysis of twitter. In: The 13th Semantic Web Conference (ISWC). pp. 324-340.
    • Speriosu, M., Sudan, N., Upadhyay, S., Baldridge, J., 2011. Twitter polarity classification with label propagation over lexical links and the follower graph. In: Proceedings of the EMNLP First workshop on Unsupervised Learning in NLP. Edinburgh, Scotland.
    • Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., Stede, M., 2011. Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational linguistics 37 (2), 267-307.
    • Takamura, H., Inui, T., Okumura, M., 2005. Extracting semantic orientations of words using spin model. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics.
    • Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G., 2012. Sentiment strength detection for the social web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (1), 163-173.
    • Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G., Cai, D., Kappas, A., 2010. Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (12), 2544-2558.
    • Turney, P., 2002. Thumbs up or thumbs down? semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'02). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
    • Turney, P., Littman, M., 2003. Measuring praise and criticism: Inference of semantic orientation from association. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 21, 315-346.
    • Turney, P. D., Pantel, P., et al., 2010. From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. Journal of artificial intelligence research 37 (1), 141-188.
    • Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P., 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
    • Wittgenstein, L., 1953, 2001. Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell, London, UK.
    • Xu, T., Peng, Q., Cheng, Y., 2012. Identifying the semantic orientation of terms using s-hal for sentiment analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems 35, 279-289.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • EC | SENSE4US

Cite this article