LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Jones, David (2017)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
This paper proposes an alternative spatial form for a university campus, which embeds itself within the region, in which it is located. The proposed campus spacing is inspired by recent research from the environmental psychology discipline, around Attention Restorative Theory (ART), along with its central four principles. Furthermore, the paper explores how a critical interpretation of Foucault’s six heterotopic principles, following Harvey, maps onto ART principles and reflexively unmasks the dialectic tensions of what is termed ‘restorative, heterotopic spacing’. In order to focus on the potential implications to campus sustainability, a specific campus initiative called the Oberlin Project will be critically explored, in relation to the potential enactment of ART, from an academic and local community perspective. It reflects on the significance of an artistic, regional set of trans-disciplinary integrated initiatives for such restorative spacing, within the expanded urban and regional notion of Oberlin campus. However, it concludes by expressing a concern over the extent to which the generative embrace of diverse Oberlin actors, both on and off campus, is being fulfilled.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Amin A and Thrift N (2002) Cities: Reimagining the Urban. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Bateson G (1967) Consciousness versus nature. Peace News, 28 July, 1622, 10.
    • Beyes T and Michels C (2011) The production of educational space: Heterotopia and the business university. Management Learning 42(5): 521-536.
    • Beyes T and Steyaert C (2012) Spacing organization, non-representational theory and performing organizational space. Organization 19(1): 45-61.
    • Braun B (2001) Place becoming otherwise. BC Studies 131: 15-24.
    • Carlson S (2011) Oberlin, Ohio: Laboratory for a new way of life. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 6 November 2011.
    • Cortese AD (2003) ) The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Planning for Higher Education 31(3): 15-22.
    • Daneri DR, Trencher G and Petersen J (2015) Students as change agents in a town-wide sustainability transformation: The Oberlin Project at Oberlin College. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 16: 14-21.
    • Davies B (2006) Subjectification: the relevance of Butler's analysis for education. British Journal of Sociology of Education 27(4): 425-438.
    • Donohue E (2015) Sustainability scholar encourages movement inclusivity. The Miscellany News, 30 September.
    • Finley S (2008) Arts-based inquiry. Performing revolutionary pedagogy. In: Denzin N and Lincoln Y (eds) Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials. London: Sage, pp. 681-694.
    • Foucault M (1997) Ethics, subjectivity and truth. In: Rabinow P (ed) Hurley R (trans.). The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984, Vol. 1. New York: New Press.
    • Foucault M (1984) The care of the self. In: Hurley R (trans.). The History of Sexuality, Vol III. New York: Pantheon.
    • Gagliardi P (1996) Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life. In: Clegg SR, Hardy C and Nord WR (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage, pp. 565-580.
    • Gagliardi P (1999) Exploring the aesthetic side of organisational life. In: Clegg SR (ed.) Studying Organisation: Theory & Method. London: Sage.
    • Goldstein AL (2011) Community engagement in sustainable design: A case study of the Oberlin Project. Oberlin College, 25 April.
    • Hartig T, Kaiser FG and Strumse E (2007) Psychological restoration in nature as a source of motivation for ecological behaviour. Environ Conserv 34: 291-299.
    • Harvey D (2009) Cosmopolitanism and the Geographies of Freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.
    • Herzog TR, Black MA, Fountaine KA, et al. (1997) Reflection and attention recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. J Environ Psychol 17: 165-170.
    • Hopkins P (2011) Towards critical geographies of the university campus: understanding the contested experiences of Muslim students. Trans Inst Br Geogr NS 36: 157-169.
    • John E (2001) Art and knowledge. In: Gaut B and Lopes D (eds) The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics. London: Routledge, pp. 329-352.
    • Johnson JD (2015) The transition to resilience: A comparative case study of two communities. Theses and Dissertations-Sociology. Paper 24. Available at: http://uknowledge.uky.edu/sociology_etds/24 (accessed 12 November 2016).
    • Kaplan S (1995) The restorative benefits of nature, towards an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15: 169-182.
    • Kaplan R (2001) The nature of the view from home, psychological benefits. Environment and Behaviour 33: 507-542.
    • Kaplan R and Kaplan S (1989) The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Kaplan S, Bardwell LV and Slakter DA (1993) The museum as a restorative experience. Environment and Behaviour 25: 725-742.
    • Koolhaas R (1995) S, M, L, XL. New York: Monacelli Press.
    • Korpela KM, Hartig T, Kaiser FG, et al. (2001) Restorative experience and self-regulation in favorite places. Environment and Behaviour 33: 572-589.
    • Lefebvre H (1991) The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Lefebvre H (2005) The Urban Revolution. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    • Massey D (2005) For Space. London: Sage.
    • Management Assistance for Nonprofit Agencies (MANA) (2013) Community conversations report, Oberlin.
    • M'Gonigle M and Starke JC (2006) Minding place: towards a (rational) political ecology of the sustainable university. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24: 325-348.
    • Oberlin College (2015) Student life. Available at: www.collegefactual.com/colleges/oberlin-college/ student-life/diversity/ (accessed 12 November 2016).
    • Orr D (1994) Earth in Mind. Washington: Island Press.
    • Orr D (2011) The Oberlin Project: What do we stand for now? Oberlin Alumni Magazine Fall 2011.
    • Orr D (2014) ) The Oberlin Project. Solutions Journal 5(1): 7-12.
    • Orr D (2015) A collaborative venture among Oberlin college, the City of Oberlin, Oberlin City Schools and Private Sector Organizations to Build a Prosperous Post-Fossil Fuel Based Economy. The Oberlin Project: A Clinton Climate Initiative Climate Positive Project. Williamstown Cool Committee, Oberlin.
    • Ouellette P, Kaplan R and Kaplan S (2005) The monastery as a restorative environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25(2): 175-188.
    • Packer J (2014) Visitors' restorative experiences in museum and botanic garden environments. In: Filep S and Pearce P (eds) Tourist Experience and Fulfilment: Insights from Positive Psychology. Oxon: Routledge, pp.202-222.
    • Packer J and Bond N (2010) Museums as restorative environments. Curator: The Museum Journal 53(4): 421-456.
    • Philo C and Parr H (2000) Institutional geographies: introductory remarks. Geoforum 31: 513-521.
    • Purcell T, Peron E and Berto R (2001) Why do preferences differ between scene types? Environment and Behaviour 33(1): 93-106.
    • Rajchman J (1998) Constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Reddell C (2010) New era for David Orr. Sustainable Industries Magazine. March 2010.
    • Saldanha A (2008) Heterotopia and structuralism. Environment and Planning A 40(9): 2080-2096.
    • Shusterman R (2001) Pragmatism: Dewey. In: Gaut B and Lopes D (eds) The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics. London: Routledge, pp. 97-106.
    • Steyaert C (2006) Cities as heterotopias and third spaces: the example of ImagiNation, the Swiss Expo 02. In: Clegg SR and Kornberger M (eds) Space, Organizations and Management Theory. Copenhagen: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press, pp. 248-265.
    • Taylor SS and Hansen H (2005) Finding form, looking at the Eeld of organizational aesthetics. Journal of Management Studies 42(6): 1211-1232.
    • The Oberlin Project (2015) Frequently asked questions. Available at: www.oberlinproject.org/about/ faq/frequently-asked-questions-1#how-is-the-oberlin-project-funded (accessed 15 December 2015).
    • Trupin I (2015) Oberlin students and alumni demand accountability, not corporate criminal trustees. Responsible Endowments Coalition, July 16. Available at: www.endowmentethics.org (accessed 12 November 2016).
    • Tucker I (2010) Everyday spaces of mental distress: the spatial habituation of home. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28(3): 526-538.
    • Ulrich RS and Parsons R (1992) Influences of passive experiences with plants on individual well-being and health. In: Relf D (ed.) The Role of Horticulture in Human Well-Being and Social Development. Portland, OR: Timber Press, pp. 93-105.
    • Welsch W (1997) Undoing aesthetics. Inkpin A (trans.). London: Sage Publications.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article