LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
McQuillan, Daniel (2015)
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
In this paper I argue that pervasive tracking and data-mining are leading to shifts in governmentality that can be characterised as algorithmic states of exception. I also argue that the apparatus that performs this change owes as much to everyday business models as it does to mass surveillance. I look at technical changes at the level of data structures, such as the move to NoSQL databases, and how this combines with data-mining and machine learning to accelerate the use of prediction as a form of governance. The consequent confusion between correlation and causation leads, I assert, to the creation of states of exception. I set out what I mean by states of exception using the ideas of Giorgio Agamben, focusing on the aspects most relevant to algorithmic regulation: force-of and topology. I argue that the effects of these states of exception escape legal constraints such as concepts of privacy. Having characterised this as a potentially totalising change and an erosion of civil liberties, I ask in what ways the states of exception might be opposed. I follow Agamben by drawing on Walter Benjamin's concept of pure means as a tactic that is itself outside the frame of law-producing or law-preserving activity. However, the urgent need to respond requires more than a philosophical stance, and I examine two examples of historical resistance that satisfy Benjamin's criteria. For each in turn I draw connections to contemporary cases of digital dissent that exhibit some of the same characteristics. I conclude that it is possible both theoretically and practically to resist the coming states of exception and I end by warning what is at stake if we do not.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Agamben G (2005) State of Exception. 1 edition. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
    • Benjamin W (1995) Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings. 1st Schocken edition edition. New York: Random House USA Inc.
    • Benjamin W (2009) On The Concept of History. New York: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
    • Black E (2012) IBM and the Holocaust: The Strategic Alliance Between Nazi Germany and America's Most Powerful Corporation-Expanded Edition. Expanded edition. Washington, D.C.: Dialog Press.
    • Bland E (2010) Software predicts criminal behavior. msnbc.com, Available from: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/38723688/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/software-predi cts-criminal-behavior/ (accessed 2 May 2014).
    • Blum-Dumontet E (2012) There is No Party Like a CryptoParty. The Huffington Post UK, Available from: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/eva-blumdumontet/cryptoparty-london-encryption-_b_195 3705.html (accessed 16 May 2014).
    • Boyd D and Crawford K (2011) Six Provocations for Big Data. SSRN Scholarly Paper, Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, Available from:
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article