Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Page, Edward (2011)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: JZ, HF
This article examines the question of whether international markets in allowances conferring the right to emit greenhouse gases are consistent with a cosmopolitan approach to global and intergenerational justice. After placing emissions trading within the context of both climate change policy and cosmopolitan political theory, three normative objections are examined to the use of emissions trading to mitigate the threat of dangerous climate change. Each objection arises from a different application of cosmopolitan thinking: (i) the potentially corrosive impact of greater use of emissions allowances markets on the environmental values of successive generations of atmospheric users; (ii) the awkward relationship between emissions markets and the norms of procedural justice endorsed by all prominent cosmopolitans; and (iii) the injustice expressed by policy instruments that commodify the atmosphere. It is argued that, while each objection should prompt some care in the construction and implementation of emissions trading schemes to guarantee their legitimacy among existing and future users of the atmosphere, they do not generate a decisive normative challenge to the use of markets, properly defined and regulated, to slow global warming.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ackerman, B.A. and R.B. Stewart (1988), 'Reforming international law: the democratic caw for market incentives', Columbia Journal of International Law 13(2): 171-199.
    • Aldy, J.E. and R.N. Stavins (eds) (2008), Architectures for Agreement: Addressing Global Climate Change in the Post-Kyoto World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Banuri, T., K. Go¨ ran-Ma¨ ler, M. Grubb, H.K. Jacobson and F. Yamin (1996), 'Equity and social considerations', in J. Bruce, H. Lee and E. Haites (eds), Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 79-124.
    • Barnes, P. (2001), Who Owns the Sky?, Washington, DC: Island Press.
    • Barry, B. (2002), Political Argument: A Reissue with a New Introduction, Berkeley: University of California Press.
    • Bazin, D., J. Ballet and D. Touhri (2004), 'Environmental responsibility versus taxation', Ecological Economics 49(2): 129-134.
    • Beitz, C. (1979), Political Theory and International Relations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    • Brock, G. (2009), Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Buchanan, A. (2010), 'The legitimacy of international law', in S. Besson and J. Tasioulas (eds), The Philosophy of International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79-96.
    • Cameron, J. and D.W. Pierce (eds) (2002), Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation: Resolving the Conflict, Westport,CT: Bergin and Garvey.
    • Caney, S. (2005), Justice Beyond Borders, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • -- (2010), 'Markets, morality and climate change: what, if anything, is wrong with emissions trading', New Political Economy 15(2): 197-224.
    • Carter, N. (2007), The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Chan, M. (2009), Subprime Carbon? Re-Thinking the World's Largest New Derivatives Market, Washington, DC: Friends of the Earth, http://www.foe.org/pdf/SubprimeCarbonReport.pdf
    • Clifton, S.J. (2009), A Dangerous Obsession: The Evidence against Carbon Trading and for Real Solutions to Avoid a Climate Crunch, London: Friends of the Earth, http:// www.foe.co.uk/resource/reports/dangerous_obsession.pdf
    • De Sadeleer, N. (2002), Environmental Principles: from Political Slogans to Legal Rules, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Dobson, A. (2003), Citizenship and the Environment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • European Commission (2003), 'Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003'. Retrieved 5 December 2010 from http://www.bmu.de/ files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/emissionshandel031030.pdf
    • European Commission (2009), 'EU energy and climate change package 2013-2020', Official Journal of the European Union 52: 1-152.
    • Frey, B.S. (1997), Not Just for the Money, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    • -- (2000), Inspiring Economics: Human Motivation in Political Economy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    • Gneezy, U. and A. Rustichini (2000a), 'A fine is a price', Journal of Legal Studies 29(1): 1-17.
    • -- (2000b), 'Pay enough or don't pay at all', Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3): 791-810.
    • Goodin, R.E. (1994), 'Selling environmental indulgences', Kyklos 47(4): 573-596.
    • Grasso, M. (2010), Justice in Funding Adaptation under the International Climate Change Regime, Dordrecht: Springer.
    • Held, D. (2010), Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and Realities, Cambridge: Polity.
    • Helm, D. (2005), 'Economic instruments and environmental policy', The Economic and Social Review 36(3): 205-228.
    • Hepburn, C. (2006), 'Regulation by prices, quantities, or both: a review of instrument choice, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22(2): 226-247.
    • -- (2007), 'Carbon trading: a review of the Kyoto mechanisms', Annual Review of Environmental Resources 32: 375-393.
    • International Energy Authority (IEA) (2010), 'Addressing climate change: policies and measures database'. Retrieved 5 December 2010 from http://www.iea.org/textbase/pm/ ?mode=cc
    • Jacobs, M. (1991), The Green Economy, London: Pluto Press.
    • Kant, I. (2002[1785]), Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (edited and translated by A.E. Wood), New Haven: Yale University Press.
    • Kelman, S. (1981), What Price Incentives? Economists and the Environment, Boston, MA: Auburn House.
    • Keohane, R.O. (2009), 'Accountability in world politics', in S. Gustavsson, C. Karlsson and T. Perssson (eds), The Illusion of Accountability in the European Union, London: Routledge, pp. 11-22.
    • Kleingeld, P. and E. Brown (2006), 'Cosmopolitanism', in E.N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford, CA: Stanford University, pp. 1-23, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cosmopolitanism/
    • Kossoy, A. and P. Ambrosi (2010), State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2010, Washington, DC: World Bank.
    • Kurtzman, J. (2009), 'The low carbon diet', Foreign Policy 88(5): 114-122.
    • Lane, R.E. (1991), The Market Experience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Lazarowicz, M. (2009), Global Carbon Trading: A Framework for Reducing Emissions, London: TSO.
    • Linklater, A. (1998), The Transformation of Political Community, Oxford: Polity.
    • Lohmann, L. (2010), 'Uncertainty markets and carbon markets: variations on polanyian themes', New Political Economy 15(2): 225-254.
    • Mack, E. (1989), 'Dominos and the fear of commodification', in J.W. Chapman and J.R. Pennock (eds), Markets and Justice, New York: New York University Press, pp. 198-225.
    • MacKenzie, D. (2009), 'Making things the same: gases, emissions rights and the politics of carbon markets', Accounting, Organizations and Society 34(3/4): 440-455.
    • Meinshausen, M., N. Meinshausen, W. Hare, S.C.B. Raper, K. Frieler, R. Knutti, D.J. Frame and M.J. Allen (2009), 'Greenhouse-gas emissions targets for limiting global warming to 28C', Nature 458: 1158-1162.
    • Metcalf, G.E. (2009), 'Market-based policy options to control U.S. greenhouse gas emissions', Journal of Economic Perspectives 23(2): 5-27.
    • Nordhaus, W.D. (2007), 'To tax or not to tax: alternative approaches to slowing global warming', Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 1(1): 26-44.
    • O'Neill, J. (2007), Markets, Deliberation and Environment, London: Routledge.
    • Paavola, J. and W.N. Adger (2006), 'Fair adaptation to climate change', Ecological Economics 56(4): 594-609.
    • Page, E.A. (2011), 'Cashing in on climate change: political theory and global emissions trading', Critical Review of International, Social and Political Philosophy 14(1): 1-15.
    • Paterson, M. (2010), 'Legitimation and accumulation in climate change governance', New Political Economy 15(3): 345-368.
    • Pogge, T. (2002), World Poverty and Human Rights, Cambridge: Polity.
    • Rose, C.M. (1999), 'Expanding the choices for the global commons: comparing newfangled tradable allowance schemes to old-fashioned common property regimes', Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum 10(1): 45-72.
    • Sagoff, M. (2002), 'Controlling global climate: the debate over pollution trading', in V.V. Gehring and W.A. Galston (eds), Philosophical Dimensions of Public Policy, London: Transaction Publishers, pp. 311-318.
    • Sandel, M. (2005), Public Philosophy: Essays on Morality in Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Satz, D. (2010), Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Singer, P. (2002), One World: The Ethics of Globalization, New Haven: Yale University Press.
    • Solomon, S., D. Qin and M. Manning (2007), 'Technical summary', in S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, K. Marquis, K. Averyt, M. Tignor, H.L. Miller Jr., and Z. Chen (eds), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19-91.
    • Spash, C. (2010), 'The brave new world of carbon trading', New Political Economy 15(2): 169-196.
    • Stavins, R.N. (2008), 'Addressing climate change with a comprehensive US cap-and-trade system', Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24(2): 298-321.
    • Stern, N. (2009), A Blueprint for a Safer Planet, London: Bodley Head.
    • Stripple, J. and E. Lo¨ vbrand (2010), 'Carbon market governance beyond the public-private divide', in F. Biermann, P. Pattberg and F. Zelli (eds), Global Climate Governance Beyond 2012: Architectures, Agency and Adaptation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 165-182.
    • Tans, P. (2010), Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide, Boulder, CO: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association, from http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/
    • Tickell, O. (2008), Kyoto2, London: Zed Books.
    • Cosmopolitanism, climate change, and greenhouse emissions trading 69
    • Tietenberg, T. (2006), Emissions Trading: Principles and Practice, 2nd edn., Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
    • Torres, G. (2002), 'Who owns the sky?', Pace Environmental Law Review 19(2): 515-574.
    • UK Government (2008), 'Climate change Act of 2008 (C.27)'. Retrieved 5 December 2010 from http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2008/ukpga_20080027_en_1
    • UK Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) (2009), 'The UK low carbon transition plan: national strategy for climate and energy'. Retrieved 5 December 2010 from http:// www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/white%20papers/uk%20low%20carbon%20transition %20plan%20wp09/1_20090724153238_e_@@_lowcarbontransitionplan.pdf
    • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2009), 'Copenhagen Accord (Draft Decision -/CP.15)'. Retrieved 5 December 2010 from http://unfccc.int/ resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/11a01.pdf#page=4
    • US Congress (2009), 'American clean air and security act of 2009 (H.R. 2454)'. Retrieved 5 December 2010 from http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname= 111_cong_bills&docid=f:h2454pcs.txt.pdf
    • Waldron, J. (2000), 'What is cosmopolitan?', Journal of Political Philosophy 8(2): 227-243.
    • Walsh, A. (2001), 'Are market norms and intrinsic valuation mutually exclusive', Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79(4): 525-543.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article